I would urge all to watch this video about the truths, myths, and lies about the Vietnam War -- my war.
I served from December 16, 1967, to December 16, 1968...
I would urge all to watch this video about the truths, myths, and lies about the Vietnam War -- my war.
I served from December 16, 1967, to December 16, 1968...
Conspiracy theory?
Nope...
It's real, but I didn't need an explosive article to prove that to me!
Now, JFK, Jr. is about to expose the treasonous rats that have been experimenting on the American public for far too long, causing, no doubt, all types of sickness and disease, not to mention poisoning the soil that our great farmers grow their food for us to consume!
So, take a quick read of this article from thegatewaypundit.com and written by Vigilant Fox RFK Jr. Names the Government Agency Behind America’s Geoengineering Nightmare | The Gateway Pundit | by Vigilant Fox
One more thing... Let us hope and pray that RFK, Jr., is kept safe and sound after uncovering these monsters!!
(This story originally appeared on vigilantfox.com and was republished with permission.)
"For years, chemtrails have been sold to us as just a “conspiracy theory.”
Now, RFK Jr. isn’t just confirming that “crimes” are happening. He’s exposing exactly who’s behind them.
Before we get into Kennedy revealing who’s behind the geoengineering project, we need to start this story with some crucial context.
Back in August 2024, before he became Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. responded to an X post about a “chemtrail pilot whistleblower.”
At the time, he made a bold promise: “We are going to stop this crime.”
Fast forward to today, and Kennedy is doubling down on putting a stop to geoengineering.
Just a few days ago, after the British government announced new geoengineering efforts to “combat climate change,” he responded with an even stronger statement.
“We will soon end this crime against humanity and our planet,” Kennedy said, “and bring justice to the plutocrats who are perpetrating this mass uncontrolled experiment.”
RFK Jr. recently sat down with Dr. Phil, and he stunned the audience when a woman named Emily asked him point-blank about the toxic aerosols being sprayed over us every day.
“My biggest concern is the stratospheric aerosol injections that are continuously peppered on us every day,” Emily said.
“Bromium, aluminum, strontium—it’s sprayed in our skies. All day long.”
“And I know you’ve talked to Dane Wigington about this, he seems to be one of the experts in the field…”
“How do we stop it?” she asked.
Most politicians would’ve panicked, deflected, or dismissed the question entirely.
But not RFK Jr. He looked her in the eye, answered without hesitation, and said, “That is not in my agency.”
He didn’t deny it was happening. He didn’t hide behind bureaucratic language. He simply made it clear: this isn’t coming from HHS.
Then came the bombshell.
“You know, we [HHS] don’t do that. It’s done—we think—by DARPA.”
Let that sink in. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) might be behind what’s being sprayed in our skies.
And according to RFK Jr., “A lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel,” he said. “Those [toxic] materials are put in jet fuel.”
“I’m going to do everything in my power to stop it,” Kennedy added. “We’re bringing on somebody who’s going to think only about that.”
He ended with a vow that few in Washington would ever dare make: “Find out who’s doing it and holding them accountable.”
When it comes to chemtrails, RFK Jr. isn’t pretending this is some fringe theory. He’s saying the quiet part out loud—and taking aim at the deepest parts of the military-industrial complex."
Watch the full conversation below:
Find more stories like this at vigilantfox.com
End of article, but not the end of the story, it's only the beginning!
Pray for strength and honor!
Viva Cristo Rey! Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...
St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...
St. Joseph pray for us!!
Gene DeLalla
Let the title of this article sink in!
Satan's minions have complete possession of the intellects of these life-hating, Christ-hating Democrats!
There is no other explanation!
They have completely abandoned the Natural Law -- and the Commandment not to kill! -- in favor of appeasing those in favor of slaughtering these tiny, American, pre-born baby girls and boys.
And what about the "mothers" of their developing pre-born children? Do they know what they are actually doing to them? Do they realize the pain and agony they will inflict on their tiny babies when they enter the death chamber?
Where are the fathers of these babies?
Do they have no input about what happens to their potential offspring?
Or are they complicit and in favor of these murders?
This is another prime example of the Democratic party being the party of the damned...
It is obvious that such creatures do not believe that they will have to account for their heinous actions at their Particular Judgment when facing Our Blessed Lord.
Such unbelief makes the Evil One, one happy, damned dude!
One more thing to think about when you read what the bishops say in this article... Sure, they condemn the culture of abortion, but why don't they come right out and say they will excommunicate any "Catholic" participating in this diabolical legislation?
Perhaps they are all talk and no action? It seems so...
Here are the particulars from an article in lifesitenews.com and written by Matt Lamb Tue Apr 29, 2025 - 11:35 am EDT:Democrats approve taxpayer-funded abortion in Colorado after claiming birth is 'more expensive' - LifeSite
"DENVER (LifeSiteNews) — Colorado taxpayers will now be forced to subsidize abortions in the state, following a new law signed by Democratic Governor Jared Polis.
Governor Jared Polis signed the legislation on Thursday, April 24. It will reportedly allocate a minimum of $1.5 million in taxpayer funds per year toward abortions, require state employee health insurance to cover abortion costs, and codify abortion up until birth.
Backers of the bill championed a legislative finding that the law will allegedly save money because killing babies with state dollars is cheaper than paying for births. The Democrats also championed the idea that the state will allegedly save money because instead of providing health coverage for poor residents, the state will just kill them off before they are born.
“Colorado is making sure that we are completely protecting the right to choose,” Gov. Polis said at the signing, criticizing what he called “government overreach” regarding pro-life policies at the federal level, as reported by The Denver Post.
Protecting the rights of preborn babies and making it harder for women to kill their babies is “not the Colorado way,” Polis explained.
The lieutenant governor also brought her granddaughter to the ceremony to celebrate that she will find it easier to kill the politician’s great-grandchild. “I want her to have the same rights that I did growing up,” Lt. Gov. Dianne Primavera said.
Senate Bill 183 codifies a voter-passed referendum in November 2024 that removed restrictions on taxpayer funding for abortions. Prior to the vote, Colorado only subsidized the killing of its citizens if they were conceived in rape, incest, or alleged “life endangerment.”
Pro-lifers, however, affirm that the circumstances of conception do not determine someone’s value. Furthermore, direct abortion is never actually necessary, as medical experts have attested.
Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains also cheered on the bill’s passage and codification.
The Democrats pushing the bill suddenly turned into fiscal conservatives when it came to the bill.
As reported by LifeSiteNews:
During a March 25 House Health & Human Services Committee meeting, Democrat Colorado House Speaker Julie McCluskie argued for state-funded abortion services on the basis that abortion is less expensive than births.
“A birth is more expensive than an abortion,” she told the committee. “Ultimately, we do achieve a cost savings because of the averted births that will not take place.
“This bill will actually decrease costs (…) as the savings from averted births outweigh the costs of covering reproductive health care [i.e., the murder of the unborn] for all Coloradans,” McCluskie continued.
“Those savings come from the averted births that will not occur because abortions happened instead,” she argued.
The line of reasoning drew criticism from pro-life leaders.
“Seriously, the bill’s sponsors are saying that if more babies die by abortion, it will be cheaper for the state,” Dr. Catherine Wheeler, a pro-life OB-GYN and former abortionist, told the committee.
Colorado’s bishops also had criticized the legislation.
“As the Catholic Bishops of Colorado, we write to express our deep disappointment and grave concern regarding SB 183, which violates the dignity of human life and disregards the safety of women and the conscience rights of millions of Coloradans who do not want to pay for abortion,” the bishops wrote.
Commenting on the cost savings argument, the prelates wrote it was “an egregious reflection of the inhumane mentality behind the bill.”
“Every human life, from conception to natural death, is a sacred gift from God. No act of law can change this truth, nor can it erase our moral obligation to defend the most vulnerable among us,” they wrote.
The president of Students for Life of America also criticized the bill upon its signing.
“Colorado: where ‘fiscal responsibility” now means spending millions to end lives instead of saving them,” Kristan Hawkins wrote on X.
“Gov. Polis just signed a bill forcing taxpayers to fund abortions through Medicaid and state employee plans,” she wrote. “Congrats, Colorado—your budget now includes preborn casualties.”'
End of very revealing and disturbing article..
Pray for the defeat and conversion of these very sick and demented individuals!
Viva Cristo Rey! Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...
St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...
St. Jospeh pray for us!!
Gene DeLalla
I repeat the title of my article: Heterodox, Heretical "Archbishop" Scolds ‘Disobedient,’ ‘Prideful’ Parishioners For Receiving Communion On The Tongue!
Let that sink in!
What conclusion would a practicing Catholic come to if a "bishop" tells you that receiving Holy Communion on the tongue is "disobedient" and "prideful" and is disruptive to "church unity"?
My conclusion is that this "archbishop" is a servant of Luther (and hence, Satan), rather than his real Master, Christ Our Lord.
How much longer will we see and hear the horror stories of the misuse, blasphemies and sacrileges by those receiving the Blessed Sacrament in their filthy, unconsecrated hands at the new, novus ordo, synodal "church"?
I contend that anyone, whether that be laity, religious, priests, bishops, cardinals or popes, really believe in the Real Presence, then the practice of Communion in the hand would die on the vine post haste!
But alas, that is a major part of the problem: not believing in the Real Presence!
I digress...
Here is an article from lifesitenews.com and written by Antonino Cambria Italian archbishop scolds 'disobedient,' 'prideful' parishioners for receiving Communion on tongue - LifeSite
"(LifeSiteNews) — A video shows Archbishop Bruno Forte of the Archdiocese of Chieti-Vasto, Italy, calling out three parishioners for receiving the Holy Eucharist on the tongue.
During his homily, Forte called out three congregants for receiving Holy Communion on the tongue and claimed that any Catholic who chooses to receive communion on the tongue is not only being “disobedient” to the Church hierarchy but also committing the sin of pride. Forte has previously barred the faithful in his archdiocese from receiving the Eucharist on the tongue and has a history of making heretical statements.
“And let me clarify one point, there were three people who did not want Communion in their hands. So, first of all, in the New Testament, Jesus says, ‘Lambante.’ The verb ‘lambano’ in Greek means to take in (the) hand. For centuries, the Church has taken Communion in (the) hand. Only in some dark centuries, (the Church) fearing lack of hygiene, replaced this gesture with that of taking (Communion) in (the) mouth,” the archbishop said.
Contrary to Forte’s claims, the reception of Holy Communion on the tongue was the norm in the Church for over 1,300 years, while Communion in the hand only became widespread globally in the 1970s.
As Pope Paul VI affirmed in Memoriale Domini, which granted bishops permission to allow the distribution of the Eucharist in the hand with approval from the Holy See, the practice of receiving Holy Communion on the tongue “must be retained … especially because it expresses the faithful’s reverence for the Eucharist.”
READ: Largest survey of US Catholics shows faithful want an end to Communion in the hand
Forte then accused his three parishioners and all Catholics who receive the Eucharist on the tongue of committing sins of “pride” and “disobedience.”
“But thank God today we are all grown up, the hands give (the Eucharist) to us slowly. So Communion is taken in the hand, with the humble gesture of extending the hand and receiving (the host). Those who do not (receive communion on the hand commit) an act of pride. He thinks he is wiser than the pope and the bishops who have decided that communion is taken in the hand. Please be humble and obedient to the Church. At least when you take communion and receive Jesus, doing His will, which is the will expressed in the Church by the pope and the bishops,” he said.
Likewise, the Code of Canon Law, which binds all bishops and priests in the Roman Rite, legislates the following:
Sacred ministers cannot deny the sacraments to those who seek them at appropriate times, are properly disposed, and are not prohibited by law from receiving them. (Can. 843 §1.)
Any baptized person not prohibited by law can and must be admitted to holy communion. (Can. 912)
Additionally, Cardinal Francis Arinze, the prefect of the Vatican’s Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (CDWDS) under Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI, confirmed that receiving Holy Communion on the tongue while kneeling remains the “preferred form.”
EXCLUSIVE: Abp. Viganò uses AI to show how Communion in the hand destroys belief in the Real Presence
Receiving the Eucharist in the hand also significantly increases the risk of profanation against the Blessed Sacrament and inevitably leads to losing particles of the Eucharist, which may fall on the floor or elsewhere.
Forte previously forbade priests in the archdiocese from distributing Communion on the tongue and barred the clergy from filling holy water fonts.
READ: Italian archbishop forbids Communion on tongue, holy water fonts despite end of COVID pandemic
The archbishop has also been an ardent proponent of allowing the divorced and “remarried” to receive Holy Communion. Forte argued that it is loving “as God does” for priests to give the Eucharist to these couples who are living in adultery. Additionally, Forte has blasted prelates who criticized Pope Francis, saying they are a threat to the Church’s “unity.”'
End of very revealing article...
Pray for strength and honor!
Viva Cristo Rey! Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...
St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...
St. Joseph pray for us!!
Gene DeLalla
WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
(This article may be very hard to take, but the truth shall set you free!)
I remember a few short years ago, I was listening to legislators debating a pro-life bill in the Texas state house, of course there were the baby killers as well as the pro-lifers giving their respective reasons why the bill should or should not be passed.
I began to hear a fairly low chant from those sitting in the balcony above... I couldn't make out exactly what they were chanting, but then when the video was replayed, and background chatter was eliminated, I could distinctively hear -- are you ready? -- "Hail Satan, Hail Satan"!
There was no mistake, it was just that: "Hail Satan"!
I wonder, did those poor, lost souls think that by supporting or appeasing the Evil One, that they will somehow be "rewarded" for their loyalty to the Beast when they leave this earth??
I think we all know the answer to that, right?
By the way, that pro-life bill initially failed to pass, but it did pass the next time it was brought up for debate, thank goodness!!
Well, not to be outdone, the party of the damned, the Democrats in the state of Washington, have passed a bill that would, for all practical purposes, sanction infanticide -- without any penalty, of course!
Now, the governor of Washington state is a character by the name of Bob Ferguson, a very pro-death maniac, so there is no doubt that when that bill comes to his desk, he is sure to put his blood-stained signature to it!
From lifesitenews.com and written by Doug Mainwaring Fri Apr 25, 2025 - 2:56 pm EDT: Washington state Democrats pass bill effectively legalizing infanticide - LifeSite.
"OLYMPIA, Washington (LifeSiteNews) — Washington state Democratic legislators have sent to Governor Bob Ferguson a bill that, if enacted, will make it more difficult for law enforcement to investigate infanticide and sex trafficking.
Deceptively titled “an act relating to dignity in pregnancy loss,” substitute Senate Bill 5093 (SSB 5093) “repeals the crime of concealing a birth and guts the authority of coroners to investigate suspicious infant deaths unless there’s an obvious, provable crime attached,” according to conservative talk show host Jason Rantz.
“Democrats are disguising it as a measure about ‘dignity in pregnancy loss,’” noted Rantz. “It’s not. It amounts to a state-sanctioned shield for traffickers, abusers, and anyone else looking to cover up a dead infant.”
“Unless a baby is clearly murdered with intent and there’s a smoking gun, no one’s allowed to ask questions. That’s not compassion. That’s enabling murder,” said Rantz.
Republican State Representative Brian Burnett, a former sheriff, had urged his colleagues during a floor discussion to amend the bill to hold traffickers accountable, according to a report by The Center Square.
Burnett shared the harrowing story of his own adopted daughter’s experience with human trafficking.
“She was impregnated many times at a very young age,” recounted Burnett, “from miscarriage to forced abortion to delivering some of those premature babies not knowing what happened to them and even later bringing back a different baby and telling her, ‘You will care for it now until we say different.’”
Unmoved, speaker pro tempore, Rep. Chris Stearns, a Democrat, shut Burnett down, accusing him of impugning the arguments of others.
“These are often very young girls who end up pregnant because they are being used as sex objects and the pimps and traffickers abuse them and often beat them up because they got pregnant and cause a miscarriage,” Rep. Jim Walsh, a Republican, told The Center Square.
“Sometimes a baby is born and neglected and dies; I mean it’s horrible stuff,” said Walsh. “The reason the law should stay on the books is it gives prosecutors and cops a tool for investigating these situations where a baby is born and dies and make sure there is no criminality involved.”
“By decriminalizing the concealment of the remains of a child who was born alive and then died, it legalizes infanticide,” declared the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) in a letter to the governor imploring him not to sign the legislation into law.
“This bill removes a major pillar in the protection of pre-born and infant life by repealing Wash. Rev. Code § 9.02.050 (‘Concealing Birth’). That statute makes it a misdemeanor for anyone to conceal the birth of a child by ‘any disposition of its dead body, whether the child died before or after its birth.’ This law accords with other laws that require the proper disposition of a human body after death,” the letter states.
The ACLJ further explained:
At the heart of our concern is the bill’s repeal of Washington statute § 9.02.050, which criminalizes the concealment of a child’s birth. This law plays a vital role in protecting both mothers and infants from abuse, violence, and exploitation. Its removal opens the door for infanticide to be carried out without fear of legal consequence, very relevant in cases involving trafficking, coercion, or domestic abuse.
Further, instead of bolstering investigations into suspicious infant deaths, SB5093 removes the coroner’s jurisdiction to investigate the death of an infant after a botched abortion. Specifically, the bill strikes a key phrase from current law, removing the ability of the coroner to investigate “where death results from a known or suspected abortion.” This dangerous bill effectively legalizes infanticide.
“SB 5093 doesn’t bring dignity to pregnancy loss,” Jason Rantz said. “It brings darkness, secrecy, and the disturbing reality that in Washington state, babies can be born, die, and be swept under the rug without anyone daring to ask why. But they call this progress.”'
End of very disturbing article...
We must continue to pray for the defeat of these culture of death monsters fully in the grip of their master, Satan, but also for their conversion!
Pray for strength and honor!
Viva Cristo Rey! Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...
St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...
St. Joseph pray for us!!
Gene DeLalla
I'm really beginning to wonder... Just the other day, apostate "Catholic" Democrat governor of Washington State, Ferguson, si...