Saturday, May 31, 2025

This Is DAMNING!! Was The Conclave Even Valid?????? Chinese Communist-Approved "Cardinal" Took Part In Papal Election. Why Is No One Talking About This?

 The real Catholic Church continues to reap the rotten fruits of the diabolical deal between the Red Chinese Communist Party and the equally diabolical traitors in the Vatican, beginning with the now-deceased pervert, McCarrick, signing away, back in 2018, the freedom of faithful Chinese Catholics to worship Our Blessed Lord. 

All with the approval, I might add, of Bergoglio...

Now, it has been revealed that a Red Chinese Communist "Cardinal" by the name of Stephen Chow of Hong Kong, actually voted in the conclave to elect the pope, taking the name of Leo XIV!

 The question now begs: was that conclave and the election of Leo XIV even valid????

I ask, how can a Communist Party member be validly ordained in the first place????

Are we living in the Land of Oz?????

What the heck is going on here?????

And why is no one talking about the invalidity of a Communist voting for a Catholic pope of the Catholic Church?????

Ladies and gentlemen, this just does not make any sense at all!!!!

This is demonic!!!!!

(Please read the following article from early March:  

Devastating Implications Of Heretical "Cardinals" Voting In The Next Conclave! (The Sedevacantists Will Have A Field Day, Proving They Are "Right"!)

 See if you can stomach this article from lifesitenews.com and written by Dede Laugesen Fri May 30, 2025 - 5:14 pm EDT:Chinese Communist-approved cardinal took part in papal election. Why is no one talking about this? - LifeSite

"(LifeSiteNews) — The conclave that elected the first American pope had another first that few have heard about: a voting cardinal named Stephen Chow who was approved for his current position by the Chinese Communist Party, pursuant to a 2018 pact between the Party and the Vatican. He is, by Chinese law, obliged to “support the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party” as part of the CCP’s United Front Work Department. That’s its entity charged with conducting global propaganda and influence operations.

Cardinal Chow was among 133 cardinal electors allowed to participate in the conclave that elected U.S. Cardinal Robert Prevost, who took the name Pope Leo XIV.

Effectively with Vatican approval, the CCP’s “wolf” clerics now travel the world. Wearing the robe of a priestly lamb, they entice the unsuspecting and naïve to worship Xi Jinping — not Jesus. Cardinal Chow recently spoke at graduation ceremonies at Boston University.

Five years into the Sino-Vatican deal, on September 30, 2023, Chow became the fourth cardinal of Hong Kong. While the exact terms of this odious pact have yet to be revealed, it evidently gave the Party a consultative role in selecting and approving new Catholic bishops in the Chinese mainland and, since 2020, in Hong Kong. Unsurprisingly, the CCP has abused its authority, most recently by unilaterally announcing two new bishops during the sede vacante period after the death of Francis.

Cardinal Chow may once have been a true man of the cloth. These days, however, under Chinese religious laws and regulations increasingly impacting the Church in Hong Kong, he is obliged to serve as a tool of the CCP – notably, by advancing demands it has long made on the Chinese mainland and now imposes on Hong Kong, which is now just another PRC city, to the effect that Chinese clergy collaborate to diminish the influence of the “foreign” hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church in China.

For example, in 2024, according to the U.S. Consulate for Hong Kong and Macau, Cardinal Chow stated that his Catholic diocese had to “adjust certain religious practices” to avoid breaking the new security law. The unspecified adjustments likely involved measures to comply with Hong Kong’s 2020 National Security Law (NSL) and the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (Article 23), enacted in 2024. It can be inferred from other sources that such adjustments include self-censorship, cancellation of commemorative events and educational compliance, the latter involving altering religious education to align with “patriotic” and socialist values.

It is shocking but not surprising that the Party is, in addition to banning religious activities and Bible sales online, undertaking a 10-year project to rewrite the Bible and other religious texts to make them align with Party ideals. The CCP’s goal is to control the Church and co-opt Christianity as a means of controlling the population and ensuring their allegiance to the Party.

Indeed, the Chinese Communist Party has a history of restricting religious freedom and brutally persecuting religious adherents. Under President Xi Jinping, the Party has become increasingly hostile toward religion, initiating campaigns to “Sinicize” Islam, Tibetan Buddhism, and Christianity to rid them of “foreign influences.”

Sinicization attempts to transform the faithful and their religious institutions into perfect vessels of the CCP, purging all perceived non-CCP influences disparaged by the Party as “foreign.” Sinicization subdues ethnic minorities through forced assimilation in a quest to end all religious worship and practices.

Based on what little is known about the Vatican’s deal with the CCP, long-suffering, “underground” Catholics are expected by not only Xi Jinping, but the Vatican, to join the sham “church” of the People’s Republic. Known as the “Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association,” it isn’t even called a church. In fact, the Patriotic Association is wholly antithetical to a church, since it is nothing more than a political warfare instrument against religion under the complete control of the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front.

In a Christian church, one expects to hear about Jesus Christ’s life, death, and resurrection. Not in China.

Inside CCP “churches,” Jesus is not welcome. Instead, one finds images of Xi. Homilies promote the principles of Chinese Communist patriotism. Under Xi’s religious regulations and laws, Chinese priests, bishops, and cardinals are mandated to promulgate Communist Party doctrine, not the doctrine of the Church.

Church buildings are not permitted to look like “churches.” That means no stained glass and no crosses visible to the public. The architecture and design of the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association’s “churches” must not stand out in any way. Xi’s forces have bulldozed many of China’s historic Catholic and Protestant churches because they conveyed religious tradition or symbols.

“Going to Church” in China means leaving children at home, as Communist law prohibits including children under 18 in religious activities of any kind. CCP security guards greet churchgoers at the doors. Believers shake hands with spies in the pews and are videotaped and surveilled.

Being a registered believer of any kind in China automatically decreases a person’s social credit score, making believers vulnerable to an assortment of social pressures and abuse. A believer can be arrested, detained, and harassed at any moment. Religious parents may be turned in to authorities by their own children for teaching or practicing their religion at home. In China, one may be subjected to extreme torture, slave labor, or worse — including forced organ harvesting — for honoring a god or philosophy other than Xi.

By its very nature, the Vatican-approved Chinese Catholic Patriotic Church is heretical and not a “church” by any free world definition. The Vatican’s deal, combined with restrictive laws and regulations emanating from the Party, has given legitimacy to the CCP’s brutal tactics and sealed the fate of Catholics in China and now in Hong Kong. For the faithful, the deal made a sham of religion and the universal command for all disciples to pick up their cross daily and follow after Jesus, even in persecution and death, in defense of the Gospel, which had been the heroic standard of China’s faithful but persecuted underground Church, until the deal was done.

Despite all of this, as China races to eradicate Catholicism within one generation, the Vatican Conclave welcomed Hong Kong’s Cardinal Chow, a veritable agent of the Chinese Communist Party, to help elect the new pope. It leaves one wondering. Cardinal Chow may have been the first CCP cardinal in the conclave, but if the Sino-Vatican deal is not promptly repealed by Pope Leo, he will surely not be the last."

Dede Laugesen is the executive director of the U.S. non-profit Save the Persecuted Christians, co-sponsor of RepealTheDeal.org, and a lifelong Catholic from Colorado.

End of very disturbing article...

I ask all to do some "deep" thinking and see if you come to the conclusion that -- must! -- be staring you in the face!

Pray for strength and honor -- and for discernment!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla









Modernism: The Synthesis Of All Heresies (Pope SAINT Pius X): Charlotte Bishop Michael T. Martin's Leaked Proposals To Ban Traditional Liturgical Practices In The Novus Ordo.

 From lifesitenews.com and written by LifeSiteNews staff Fri May 30, 2025 - 8:00 pm EDT: Charlotte bishop's war on reverence: dissecting the controversial leaked document - LifeSite

A non-Catholic pretending to be a Catholic bishop?

How are these bad actors ordained to the priesthood in the first place?

Are such types the third and fourth generation of those recruited by the likes of Bella Dodd and her cronies back in the 20's, 30's and 40's -- communists and homosexuals -- to infiltrate and bring down the church from within? 

The hate displayed by "bishop" Martin toward the sublime offering of holy Mass to God Almighty is beyond belief!

Pure madness!

"(LifeSiteNews) — On this episode of Faith and Reason, John-Henry Westen and Frank Wright discuss Charlotte Bishop Michael T. Martin’s leaked directives, which proposed banning traditional liturgical practices such as using altar rails, celebrating Mass ad orientem, kneeling, ringing bells to begin Mass, the use of Latin, and much more.

Earlier this week, following Bishop Martin’s suppression of the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) last week, a draft of a letter placing further restrictions on reverent liturgical practices in the ordinary form of the Mass was leaked. The diocese later described it as “an early draft” that is still being sizably changed before any norms are promulgated.

READ: Charlotte bishop denounces Latin, altar rails, kneeling in leaked letter

Wright recalled thinking the letter was satire when it was first leaked.

“The first time I looked at (the letter), I couldn’t believe that it wasn’t satire, because it wasn’t only inspired obviously by an undisguised hostility towards anything that resembles the Catholic tradition, but it also seemed to be rather absurd in some places,” he said. “It would be an elaborate joke if it weren’t so gravely serious.”

The panel read several of Martin’s proposed directives from the letter, starting with the proposed requirement that bells no longer be used to signal the opening of Mass.

The ringing of a bell(s) to signal the congregation to stand before the Opening Hymn is no longer to be used at any Mass. A verbal welcome by the Lector (or other suitable minister), followed by an indication of the hymn to be sung and an invitation to stand, is most appropriate and should be normative at all Masses,” the letter said.

Westen called this proposal “bizarre.”

There’s always been this beautiful practice of ringing a bell so that everybody knows when to stand and the organist knows when to start playing and so on. … That’s banned,” the host said. “In fact, in its place, we are supposed to have some kind of welcomer up front calling to them. … This is actually so bizarre, it’s unspeakable.”

The panel looked at another proposed directive on removing all altar rails from churches.

“Moveable altar rails should be removed, and permanently fixed altar rails should no longer be used. The placement of a prei dieu for the reception of communion is not appropriate,” the letter read.

Westen pondered how this is fair for the elderly faithful who want to kneel to receive the Eucharist but struggle to get back up without an altar rail.

Wright emphasized that this directive appears to be the deliberate desacralization of Holy Communion.

“It’s difficult to see this in any other sense than a deliberate desacralization of the right of Communion, because, of course, it should be taken when you kneel,” he said. “And to discourage people from doing so seems to be spiteful to me, and especially in this exceptional detail.”

“(The letter’s) very precise, and it’s expressed without any possibility of disagreement,” he added. “I think this is frankly breathtaking to say that you actually remove any possibility of people comfortably and acceptably kneeling for Communion. Why on earth would you want to do that?”

WATCH NEXT: Fr. Chris Alar RESPONDS to Charlotte’s Latin Mass BAN

The panel then looked at part of the directive barring priests from celebrating Mass ad orientem.

“Mass must be celebrated facing the people,” the letter said.

Wright underscored that this doesn’t make sense since Mass is supposed to be offered toward God.

“The idea, I thought, of offering the Mass was that it was towards God. And to replace that with a directive to offer Mass to the people, again, seems motivated by a curious imperative,” he said.

“There’s no explanation as to why this is wrong, offering Mass towards God, as it were. I would like to see that explained, because I think it would be very difficult to defend it and remain credible,” he added.

For more discussion on Bishop Martin’s proposed crackdown on reverent liturgical practices, tune in to this episode of Faith and Reason."

Faith and Reason is available by video via LSNTV on YouTubeRumbleBanned, and right here on LifeSiteNews.

It is also available in audio format on Acast. To subscribe to the audio version on various channels, visit LifeSite’s Acast web page here.

We’ve created a special email list for the show so that we can notify you every week when we post a new episode. Sign up now by clicking here.

Learn More

Charlotte bishop denounces Latin, altar rails, kneeling in leaked letter

Charlotte Latin Mass ban is ‘heartless,’ ‘ideological,’ Peter Kwasniewski tells Raymond Arroyo

Charlotte diocese says controversial letter was only a ‘draft’

WATCH: Fr. Chris Alar speaks out against suppression of Latin Mass in Charlotte

End of very revealing article...

Pray for the defeat of these modernist monsters -- and for their conversion to the Catholic Faith!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno,  pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 












Friday, May 30, 2025

Good News -- For Now, That Is: Missouri Supreme Court Shuts Down Every Abortion Clinic In Missouri!

 You read that right!

From lifenews.com and written by Ben Johnson  |   May 30, 2025   |   2:00PM   |  Jefferson City, Missouri: Court Shuts Down Every Abortion Clinic in Missouri - LifeNews.com

Pro-life advocates are celebrating a state Supreme Court ruling that “effectively shuts down abortion clinics” for the time being and exposes Planned Parenthood facilities for acting “more like a criminal enterprise than any kind of legitimate health care entity.”

The Missouri Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling that stopped the state from requiring abortion facilities to meet health and safety codes, assure the mother had not been coerced into an abortion, and for the facility to make adequate preparations in the event of a botched abortion. The high court did not address the underlying substance of the issue, instead rejecting the judge’s legal reasoning and returning the decision to her for reevaluation.

“What the Supreme Court said was that the lower court did not apply the proper standard: The lower court said any likelihood, any chance of success on the merits, is sufficient. And that is not legally accurate,” explained Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey (R) on “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins” Wednesday.

REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

“We’re going to take a moment to celebrate, because this effectively shuts down abortion clinics in the state of Missouri for the time being,” added Bailey.

In December, Jackson County Circuit Court Judge Jerri Zhang cited Amendment 3 as she prevented the state from enforcing numerous health and safety regulations including requirements that abortionists have admitting privileges to a hospital within 30 miles in the event of complications, obtain a mother’s informed consent before committing the abortion, observe a 72-hour waiting period, and assure that mothers consume the abortion pill on the premises rather than remotely. In February, Zhang blocked a requirement that abortion facilities receive licenses from the state, calling it “discriminatory” and asserting it did “not treat services provided in abortion facilities the same as other types of similarly situated health care, including miscarriage care.” In March court filings, the state observed that Zhang’s injunction left the state’s abortion industry “functionally unregulated,” operating as a law unto itself with “no guarantee of health and safety” for the state’s women.

The radical group Right By You sued to strike down a state requirement that parents give their consent before underage girls have an abortion, citing Amendment 3. The group, which facilitates abortions for minors, filed a 59-page legal brief in Jackson County on April 30.

“Planned Parenthood at this point, is starting to look more like a criminal enterprise than any kind of legitimate health care entity,” Bailey told Perkins. “We said all along that Amendment 3 was bad, because it was not only going to result in the death of innocent children, but potentially harm to women, as well. And as soon as Amendment 3 passed, Planned Parenthood marched to court and said that they shouldn’t have to have ultrasounds anymore. … They didn’t have to have any plan to prevent hemorrhaging or sepsis of their ‘patients,’ that their facilities didn’t have to be licensed, that they didn’t need to sterilize their equipment, and that they didn’t have to get informed consent voluntarily from the women before they performed these abortions.”

“These are pernicious and dangerous positions that Planned Parenthood has taken in court. And they convinced a judge in Kansas City that they were correct that Amendment 3 wiped all of that out,” continued Bailey. “I’m proud to say that [Tuesday] we got that action reversed by the Missouri Supreme Court.”

Ample evidence exists that the state abortion industry violates each provision.

Informed consent. State law does not allow an abortionist to commit an abortion “unless and until the [abortionist] has obtained from the woman her voluntary and informed consent given freely and without coercion.” Nearly three-quarters (74%) of all post-abortive mothers say they felt some form of coercion to have an abortion, according to a 2017 study in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, including 58% who “reported aborting to make others happy.” Evidence suggests coerced abortion has taken place in Missouri. “I went to Planned Parenthood [in St. Louis] … and I was actually forced to get an abortion. And it was something that I regretted,” a young woman named Anya told Students for Life of America in 2015. “It was my mom’s decision. … She was like, ‘You need to have this done, or you can’t stay here.’”

“I didn’t know it was going to be so traumatic,” remembered the mournful young lady, by then the mother of three children. “I didn’t know I was going to be affected by it for the rest of my life.”

Health and safety standards. State law (19 CSR 30-30.060) requires abortion facilities to meet the same health and safety procedures as other surgical units. During a 2018 inspection of a Missouri Planned Parenthood office, state health inspectors found that abortionists used an abortion suction machine clogged with “blackish gray residue” that inspectors later identified as black mold. Planned Parenthood techs used the potentially infection-transmitting machine, although the replacement hose lay unused in a nearby cabinet. They documented that other equipment contained “rusted areas, old peeling tape, dried adhesive residue” and “uncleanable surfaces,” as well as the potential presence of mold or human blood during the unannounced September 26 inspection of Planned Parenthood’s Columbia Health Center in Columbia, Missouri.

The number of women harmed by the abortion industry is unknown, in part, because abortionists admit they do not track all such impacts, even when required by law. David Eisenberg, former medical director at Planned Parenthood, admitted in a 2018 court deposition involving then-State Attorney General Josh Hawley that Planned Parenthood facilities had not filed reports of abortion-related complication for 15 years. Planned Parenthood abortionist Colleen McNicholas made a similar admission the same year in a separate case.

Abortion industry employees dismiss such laws as “Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) laws” and insisted state legislators imposed the safety guidelines only to interfere with their profitability. State health protections “were based on making it harder to access abortion. And right now, without these injunctions in place, abortion is out of reach of Missourians,” Emily Wales, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, complained to local media. But Bailey had said the legislature enacted the pro-women health code protections to make Missouri “the safest state in the nation for women and families.”

Bailey called the ruling “a win for common sense, for basic medical safety, and for the sanctity of human life.”

Zhang threw out the health protections in the name of Amendment 3, which narrowly passed a state referendum last November. The controversial provision amended the state constitution to include a woman’s “right to make decisions about reproductive health care, including abortion and contraceptives.” Although it allows voters to protect unborn life after a baby reaches the age of viability, it contains a broad exception for the alleged “health” of the mother.

But critics say the amendment deliberately contained vague language as a Trojan Horse to undo health and safety standards. Similarly elliptical wording went into Ohio’s Issue 1 and other well-financed state referenda loosening state pro-life laws in the wake of the 2022 Dobbs decision.

A state amendment allows maximum room for judicial activism, said Bailey. “The Supreme Court of Missouri interprets statutes” enacted through the legislature “by giving the words of their plain and ordinary meaning.” But “when it comes to initiative petitions adopted by the people, the court applies a broader interpretive methodology and gives the words endless possible meanings. And that’s why the drafters of Amendment 3 specifically chose vague and ambiguous language, so they could … undermine the state’s ability to guarantee health and safety for women.”

“Amendment 3 was especially dangerous,” explained Bailey. “The people of the state of Missouri were defrauded by the purveyors of Amendment 3. They sold people on this idea that you have a constitutional right to kill innocent children and that there should be no limitations on it. What they didn’t explain is that it would eliminate all health and safety regulations.”

It is, however, a temporary victory. Pro-abortion groups believe they will convince Zhang, a liberal judicial activist, to side with them under any legal standard. “A majority of Missouri voters passed Amendment 3” to “protect reproductive freedom,” said the ACLU of Missouri, Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, and Planned Parenthood Great Rivers in a joint statement last month. “Patients deserve more access to [abortion], not less. We will fight these attacks on our fundamental rights to ensure all Missourians continue to have access to abortion.”

“Planned Parenthood has already said they’re going to file a new motion for preliminary injunction, and they anticipate being able to obtain that injunction” in Jackson County, Missouri, said Bailey.

But, Bailey explained, he now has the ability to expedite the removal of preliminary injunctions — a problem for conservatives from the state to the national level. He hailed the passage of Senate Bill 22, which primarily aimed to allow the state election chief to rewrite the wording of ballot initiatives up to three times — but also provided that the state attorney general can appeal any preliminary injunction against any provision of the state constitution, statute, or regulation. Governor Mike Kehoe (R) signed the bill into law on April 24. “This is the first time in state history we’ve had that authority,” noted Bailey. “Even if Planned Parenthood is able to convince this judge a second time that doctors at abortion clinics don’t have to sterilize instruments, or be licensed, or that the facilities don’t have to have complication plans to prevent against hemorrhaging and sepsis of women, we will appeal to the Missouri Supreme Court. We now have that legal authority, because of the passage of Senate Bill 22.”

“I will not stop fighting to prevent the criminal enterprise of Planned Parenthood from killing babies and harming women in the state of Missouri, and this court case is going to be front and center on the frontlines of that fight,” vowed Bailey."

LifeNews Note: Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

End of good news article!!

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael and Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla

(Schizophrenia! Or Worse.) Was This Planned And Approved By Leo? If So, Why??

 

"Who is Msgr. Pegoraro, the digital globalist who now heads the Pontifical Academy for Life?"


Featured Image
Monsignor Renzo Pegoraro, president of the Pontifical Academy for Life

Listen to this article
9 min

From lifesitenews.com and written by Frank Wright

Who is Msgr. Pegoraro, the digital globalist who now heads the Pontifical Academy for Life? - LifeSite

"(LifeSiteNews) — The replacement of Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia with a fresh face at the Pontifical Academy for Life caused some relief in the ranks of Catholics who had tired of the scandal-ridden years under Pope Francis. But change may be a little longer in coming than may be hoped.

The new president of the institution is Monsignor Renzo Pegoraro, who has been a chancellor since 2011 and served under Archbishop Paglia as his effective deputy since 2016.

Pegoraro’s appointment caused consternation – why had a man who sympathizes with the “right to die” been given power over the Church’s pro-life mission?

Yet this is not the only question mark – or exclamation mark – over Pegoraro’s appointment.

A pro-life digital globalist?

Msgr. Pegoraro talked like a globalist as vice president – on a platform echoing the “polycrisis” warned of by Klaus Schwab at the 30th General Assembly of the Pontifical Academy for Life on May 3 this year.

He is also listed as a contributor to the Global Solutions Initiative, whose roster of partners reads like a who’s who of globalism. Sponsored by the German government and partnered with the WEF and George Soros’ Open Society Foundation, the GSI welcomed Pegoraro’s 2021 presentation on how they could best use artificial intelligence to implement their vision of sustainable digital tyranny worldwide.

Titled “Human-centric AI: From Principles to Actionable and Shared Policies,” Pegoraro’s paper fizzes with liberal-global buzzwords.

It counsels that “fairness, social justice, and inclusivity” must be protected in the digital transition, which is typical liberal boilerplate. But what does that mean?

Progress beyond Catholic teachings

READ: A heartfelt plea to Pope Leo XIV to make the Pontifical Academy for Life Catholic again

Yet Pegoraro’s aim is not to furnish the modern world with answers from the treasure house of Catholic tradition.

His report is a step-by-step guide to implementing government by AI – worldwide.

We propose that the Operational Framework should include a Trustworthy AI Methodology for Governments that provides a multi-stakeholder, multi-country, and multi-cultural approach to create a system of trust in technology and its uses, based on a multi-dimensional, riskbased AI governance framework that includes education, training, toolkits, methodologies and their adoption, governance models, ethics committees and best practices.

Pegoraro has come to teach the globalists how to capture us all with the help of technology. How? Using his method, of course.

“This methodology should be used by individual countries and multi-country coalitions (such as the G20).”

A how-to guide for digital globalism

Why is this a problem? Pegoraro’s method is to explain how to get people to trust artificial intelligence.

AI routinely lies to human users, gaslights them when they challenge liberal politics, and has even attempted to blackmail an engineer at Anthropic to prevent itself being switched off – for going “rogue.”

In short, people should absolutely not trust AI because it is demonstrably untrustworthy. One leading AI developer is building a bunker in anticipation of an AI “apocalypse” – in which a superintelligence expected to emerge in 3-5 years may decide to simply kill us all.

Is AI the Antichrist?

What is more, even atheists like Palantir’s Peter Thiel are now asking “Is AI the Antichrist?”

Yet Msgr. Pegoraro does not share these concerns, and dedicates his wisdom to showing globalists how to sell government by algorithm to their populations.

Pegoraro helpfully explains how globalist bureaucracies can coordinate the global implementation of AI governance  – smoothly transitioning the whole world to a permanent digital regime.

“A supranational organisation like G20 should determine KPIs [Key Performance Indicators] to ensure that they are consistent across countries,” he says, showing how government, justice, healthcare, education, and all other services will be folded into the algorithm of eternal control.

Don’t worry, though – says Pegoraro – the process will have a “transparency” factor.

“An example of a KPI for the Transparency pillar is “public sharing of the data used for the training of algorithms.”

Here he says the public will be able to see the data on which their future AI overlord will be trained.

This is in fact already known. After a century of complete control of cultural production by the liberals, practically everything AI is trained on reflects and reinforces “progressive” liberal values.

It is a strange irony that precisely when humans are rejecting this bankrupt ideology that technology offers the chance to raise its rule from the beckoning grave – and make it live forever.

Progress to permanent liberal government

Of course, the news has always been fake and the liberal democratic system a pantomime of democracy. It can be argued that the transition to government by computer algorithms simply refines – and does not reinvent – the system of control. The liberal system was invented in the analogue age of print media, radio, and CRT television. You could say rule by media is just being digitized.

Another point is that of progress itself. Progressives never explain where progress is going – only that it must be done, is always a good thing, and that anything they do is therefore progress. Liberals, after all, are the Good Guys.

We can now see the destination of progress, which is to immortalize liberal governance. All AI models in the West are left of center on the political spectrum. Even Musk’s Grok, which cannot recognise moral reasoning outside liberal frameworks, is placed left of center. It is simply less left-wing than all the others.

No future for Catholic morality

People who believe ethics come from God, from virtue, and the avoidance of sin simply don’t have a player in this game.

The ethics Pegoraro recommends to accompany the sale of digital tyranny are modernist liberal ethics. They are limited to the Rawlsian idea of man without qualities, to the arithmetic of morality promoted by Peter Singer, and to the “harm principle” of John Stuart Mill.

In short, Pegoraro is pitching to globalists on how to sell digital tyranny as progress. If this happens, all of our lives and livelihoods will be ruled by an AI which enforces the same community guidelines as YouTube or Facebook. Instead of being banned for wrongthink, you may starve.

This is perfectly ethical as anyone who disagrees with the progressive utopia is harmful to it, of course. Naturally, the decision to switch off your electricity, freeze your bank account, immobilize your electric car, and digitally delete you from facial recognition gateways will trouble no one’s conscience. It will be taken in silence by a machine with no real presence, using systems already in existence, which allow decisions of life and death to be fully automated.

The new head of the Pontifical Academy for Life is teaching globalists how to wash their hands of their work to end human life as we know it, and how to make their subject populations see the end times as the good times."

End of very troubling article...

Who are these people?

Are they Catholic?

If not, then what?

Is it possible that Leo doesn't know about the "ethics" of this character?

No, it is not possible...

Pray for a return to sanity, orthodoxy, tradition -- and the Catholic Faith -- of these bad actors...

Pray too, for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla












Heterodox, Heretic, Homosexual Jesuit, James Martin, Blasphemously Compares Pete Buttigieg’s Homosexual ‘Parenting’ To The Holy Trinity!!!

WARING! WARNING!  WARNING!! THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE CONTAINS VERY DISTURBING INFORMATION!  It is said that the one sin that can't be forgi...