Not Surprising! The Democrat, Culture Of Death, Party-Of-The-Damned, Want To Make March 10 ‘Abortion Provider Appreciation Day’!!

 This is so predictable, but still so sickening...

From lifesitenews.com, written by Calvin Freiburger Fri Mar 13, 2026 - 3:08 pm EDT: 30+ Democrats back resolution to make March 10 ‘Abortion Provider Appreciation Day’ - LifeSite

One of the reasons why these cold-hearted ghouls feel they can get away with this monstrous "resolution," is because of the wimpy, gutless Republicans, many of whom are also part and parcel of the satanic lunacy of pre-born baby killing!

Not only that, but obviously they also do not believe they will have to account for their evil attacks and actions against the most vulnerable of the precious gift of life given to us by our Good God and Creator...

What a traumatic -- eternal! -- surprise awaits the un-repentant baby killer at his or her Particular Judgment!

"WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — In their latest display of fealty to the abortion industry, more than 30 Democratic members of Congress are backing a resolution to dedicate March 10 as “Abortion Provider Appreciation Day”

The resolution would set aside March 10 to “show appreciation for the [so-called] essential, high-quality care that abortion providers and all staff provide to their communities and those traveling to their communities, and to celebrate their courage, compassion, and dedication to their work.” March 10 was selected to commemorate the date in 1993 when a lone radical murdered Florida abortionist David Gunn.

The resolution goes on to call the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade “erroneous,” assail state pro-life laws for forcing abortion facilities to close, and run down a comprehensive slate of pro-abortion talking points. It “lauds communities across the United States who are proud to be home to abortion providers and staff”; “affirms the commitment of Congress to ensuring the safety of abortion providers, the ability of abortion providers to continue providing the [so-called] essential care their patients need, and the [so-called] right of patients to access abortion … no matter where they live, free from fear of violence, criminalization, or stigma”; and “declares a vision for a future free from all abortion restrictions and bans” (emphasis added).

According to a press release from the office of U.S. Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), the effort is being led by herself in the House of Representatives and by U.S. Sens. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) and Gary Peters (D-MI) in the Senate.

“On the 30th commemoration of Abortion Providers Appreciation Day, we honor the courage and care of dedicated health providers who deliver [so-called] essential reproductive health care to patients, even amid threats to their own personal safety,” declared Pressley, who co-chairs the House Reproductive Freedom Caucus. “Health care professionals and patients alike deserve safety. While Trump and Republicans attack our bodily autonomy and leave patients and clinical staff at grave risk, we continue to fight for the promise of the [so-called] fundamental right to reproductive freedom.”

Thirteen states ban all or most abortions, with a wide range of lesser restrictions also in effect. But the abortion lobby and its allies in Congress have been working feverishly to preserve abortion “access” via deregulated interstate distribution of abortion pills, legal protection and financial support of interstate abortion travel, constructing new abortion facilities near borders shared by pro-life and pro-abortion states, making liberal states refuges for those who want to evade or violate the laws of more pro-life neighbors, and embedding abortion “rights” in state constitutions, whether via activist lawsuits or state constitutional amendments.

Over the past 20 years, the Democrat Party has steadily removed any trace of moderation on abortion, to the point that, over the past decade, congressional Democrats have consistently voted against both the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which would require medical care for infants delivered alive after botched abortions, and the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban elective abortions after five months, with exceptions for rape, incest, and “medical emergencies.”

The party, including former President Joe Biden and his vice president, failed 2024 presidential nominee Kamala Harris, almost unanimously favors abortion-on-demand throughout all nine months of pregnancy, paid for by taxpayers. They also favor codifying and expanding a “right” to abortion in federal law via legislation such as the so-called Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA), which would forbid states from passing any law that not only prohibits abortion but would be “reasonably likely to delay or deter” or “indirectly” raise the cost of abortions, effectively ruling out virtually any state pro-life measures.

The full list of senators co-sponsoring the abortionist “appreciation” resolution is Hirono, Peters, Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), John Fetterman (D-PA), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Ed Markey (D-MA), Patty Murray (D-WA), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Peter Welch (D-VT), and Ron Wyden (D-OR).

The full list of House members co-sponsoring the resolution is Pressley, Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), Judy Chu (D-CA), Jasmine Crockett (D-TX), Diana DeGette (D-CO), Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Jesus Garcia (D-IL), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Hank Johnson (D-GA), Julie Johnson (D-TX), John Larson (D-CT), Gwen Moore (D-WI), Seth Moulton (D-MA), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Delia C. Ramirez (D-IL), Deborah Ross (D-NC), Andrea Salinas (D-OR), Eric Swalwell (D-CA), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Lateefah Simon (D-CA), Jill Tokuda (D-HI), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), Frederica Wilson (D-FL).

Please contact your senators or representatives and respectfully urge them to oppose this pro-abortion resolution. Contact information for reaching U.S. senators by phone, email, or letter can be found by clicking here, and information for finding your House representative and his or her contact information can be found by clicking here."

End of very revealing and disturbing article...

Pray for the defeat of these modernist monsters, and for their conversion!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun, and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph, pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla

Protestant Sen. Cruz Calls ‘Christ Is King’ An Anti-Semitic ‘Code Word’!!

 On Friday, March 13, 2026, I posted this: Is The Persecution Of Catholics Coming -- Under The Trump Administration!?

And now comes this from "conservative" Sen. Ted Cruz: Ted Cruz calls 'Christ is King' an anti-Semitic 'code word' - LifeSite, and written by LifeSiteNews staff Fri Mar 13, 2026 - 2:06 pm EDT...

"(LifeSiteNews) — U.S. Senator Ted Cruz has joined in the chorus of voices who maintain that the phrase “Christ is King” is anti-Semitic.

In a sit-down interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network this week, Cruz argued that those who use the phrase intend it to be an insult to Jewish people.

“I’m really troubled by how the phrase ‘Christ is King’ is being used,” Cruz said. “I agree with the statement ‘Christ is King,’ although it is being used online in a way that is meant to say, ‘Screw you Jews.’ It is being used in a context very directly to say, ‘I hate Jews,’ and that’s … an online code word.”

The phrase “Christ is King” grew in popularity several years ago when then-Daily Wire host Candace Owens repeatedly used it in 2024. Owens’ comments, coupled with her outspoken opposition to Israel’s war on Gaza, resulted in her being fired from the company she worked for.

Daily Wire host Andrew Klavan later admitted that Owens’ firing was the result of her repeatedly using the phrase “Christ is King,” which he said was being co-opted into an “antisemitic trope” by social media users.

Owens pushed back against those claims, telling Tucker Carlson that she rejects the claim she hates Jews and that Christ is indeed King over all men.

Owens also called out Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson for co-authoring a study released by a left-wing group linked to the radical Anti-Defamation League that claimed “Christ is King” can be anti-Semitic.

READ: White House officially removes Carrie Prejean Boller from Religious Liberty Commission

Cruz tripled down on his faulty theology in his comments to the Christian Broadcasting Network.

“Jesus was a Jew,” he said. “The twisted theology that says Jews are Christ-killers … as I read the Gospels, Jesus went to the cross willingly … it was not the Jews who killed Jesus. It was me. It was you.”

While it is true that mankind’s sins are what caused Christ to have to die on the cross, multiple verses in the New Testament confirm that it was the Jews who demanded He be crucified in the first place.

“Let His blood be upon us and upon our children,” Mathew 27:25 states, referring to the cries of the Jews who demanded Jesus be crucified. “The one who handed me over to you has the greater sin,” Christ told Pontius Pilate in John 19:11. “The God of our fathers hath raised up Jesus, whom you put to death,” St. Peter said to the Jews in Acts 5:30.

Debates over the appropriateness of the phrase “Christ is King” have grown in recent weeks thanks to Carrie Prejean Boller’s remarks during hearings of President Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission.

“I would rather die than surrender my faith in Christ, and be forced to bow to a foreign nation demanding I forsake the Truth. Christ is King,” Boller wrote on X last month, quote-tweeting a LifeSiteNews petition expressing support for her after she was fired for expressing opposition to Zionism.

As of today, LifeSiteNews’s petition calling on readers to stand with Boller has garnered over 3,800 signatures. Click here to sign it.

End of very disturbing article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  CHRIST IS KING!!

Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun, and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph, pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla

Is The Persecution Of Catholics Coming -- Under The Trump Administration!?

 

Preacher invited to Pentagon by Hegseth says US should ban ‘idolatrous’ Marian, Eucharistic processions!!

Get ready for this...From lifesitenews.com, and written by Antonino Cambria Fri Mar 13, 2026 - 3:49 pm EDT: Preacher invited to Pentagon by Hegseth says US should ban ‘idolatrous’ Marian, Eucharistic processions - LifeSite

(On February 23rd, I posted this: "The Zionist Gangs Will Try And Smear You And Cancel You, But They Can’t Cancel The Truth.

Also, on February 20th, I posted this: Brave Catholic Convert Lady Speaks Out After Being Removed From "Religious Liberty Commission"!)

Now the article from lifesitenews.com

"(LifeSiteNews) — In a viral clip, Doug Wilson, an Idaho preacher and “Christian nationalist,” who was previously invited to the Pentagon by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to lead a worship service, said that, ideally, Catholics should be banned from having Marian and Eucharistic processions, calling them acts of “idolatry.”

[My emphasis.]

Wilson, the co-founder of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC), who frequently preaches on “Christian nationalism,” emphasized during an interview that in an ideal America, Catholics would be allowed to keep their churches and ring their church bells. However, they would not be permitted to hold public Marian processions, and they would likely not be allowed to hold public Eucharistic processions, because, according to Wilson, these would constitute public acts of “idolatry,” even comparing them to Hindu processions.

Hegseth has notably invited Wilson to lead a February worship service at the Pentagon, and he attends a CREC church.

“We are a Christian nation, so church bells are okay, but a Muslim call to prayer in the public space would not be okay,” Wilson said in the clip. “Catholic church bells would be okay, but a parade in honor of the Virgin Mary, carrying an image of the Virgin Mary down Main Street, no!”

When the host interjected to ask Wilson if Eucharistic processions would be allowed, Wilson said it would depend on how they are conducted, but probably not, adding that all “public displays of idolatry” as defined by the Protestant foundation of the law would be banned from the public square, erroneously comparing them to pagan Hindu processions.

“Basically, public displays of idolatry, what the Protestant foundation of the law would consider to be idolatry, would not be allowed,” he said. “So you wouldn’t have a Hindu procession with a Hindu god, you wouldn’t have a procession of the Virgin Mary.”

Several prominent Catholic thinkers responded to the clip on X. Joshua Charles, a Catholic writer and podcast host, citing St. Robert Bellarmine, underscored that the idea that a Eucharistic procession is idolatry is a “fundamentally antichristic stance.”

Catholicism – the fullness of Christianity – is notably the largest religion in the United States, with more than one quarter of the country affiliated with the Catholic Church.

Hegseth had invited Wilson to the Pentagon to lead a February 17 prayer service, with the Department of War sharing a photo of the secretary at the service via X.

Hegseth also attends Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship, a CREC church in the Nashville, Tennessee, area. Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell also told the Associated Press that the secretary “very much appreciates” many of Wilson’s teachings and writings.

End of very troubling and revealing article...

I ask; will the heretic "cardinals" Cupich, McElroy, and Tobin condemn these protestants for the bigotry and hate they spew concerning Our Lord and His most Blessed Mother?

Don't hold your breath!

Is our ongoing "white martyrdom" quickly turning into a red martyrdom?

Pray for strength and honor -- we Catholics will need now more than ever!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun, and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph, pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla

Priest: ‘Too Many In The Church’ Would Rather Condemn The SSPX Instead Of Abortion, Sodomy...

 "The Vatican/SSPX dispute is an unfortunate situation for sure. But is it an intrinsically evil act to ordain bishops without the Pope's approval?"

From lifesitenews.com, and written by Fr. Kevin Drew Thu Mar 12, 2026 - 1:46 pm EDT: Priest: 'Too many in the Church' would rather condemn the SSPX instead of abortion, sodomy - LifeSite

"(LifeSiteNews) — I get most all of my news regarding the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals from an old married couple at the nursing home. When I pop in they are almost always glued to the TV, watching sports.

On a recent visit I was somewhat surprised when the topic of religion came up before athletics. Before we started in about the Chiefs’ backfield or the Royals’ bullpen, the husband opened with a theological statement. He said, “Some lady told us you ran everyone off from your parish since you say Mass in Latin.” And I said, “Now wait a minute. That’s not totally true. I only say parts of the Mass in Latin. And I didn’t run everyone off, just most everyone.”

Now, for using Latin at Mass, does that make me “anti-Vatican II?” The Second Vatican Council, held from 1962-1965, had over 2,000 bishops go to Rome in the autumn months for 8-12 weeks to hold meetings. What was so important? Was there some great theological dispute to solve or heresy to crush? No. Wikipedia states:

Vatican II was called by Pope John XXIII to modernize the Catholic Church and address its relationship with the contemporary world, aiming to make its teachings more relevant and accessible.

Encyclopedia Britannica states:

The Second Vatican Council … produced 16 documents that enacted many modernizing changes in the church according to the theme of aggiornamento (Italian: “bringing up to date”).

The Vatican II bishops enjoyed nice lodgings, took in the sights in Rome, and ate and drank at fine restaurants. And then, when they attended meetings to discuss how to bring the Church up to date, “specialists” or “experts” were brought in to guide the process. Those experts arguably swayed bishops on how to vote on the proposed documents.

The first Vatican II document was on the Sacred Liturgy. The very first paragraph gave reasons to make changes to Holy Mass, including so that the Church could “adapt more suitably to the needs of our own times.”

The 36th paragraph of the liturgy document states that “the Latin language is to be preserved in the Latin rites.” Then it goes on to say the vernacular “may” be used, giving for examples, the readings, and some of the prayers and chants. Paragraph 54 states once again that the vernacular “may” be used. And if so, “steps should be taken so that the faithful may also be able to say or to sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass which pertain to them.” (The Gloria, Sanctus, Agnus Dei, etc.) So there it is in black and white. When my parish sings in Latin at Mass, we are not disobeying Vatican II but actually doing what the Council said to do.

In 2009 I spent the summer serving Mass every day for a traditional priest from France who was ordained for the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), a religious order founded in 1970. In 1988 he became a founding member of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP). That summer I spied a book in his office he let me borrow titled The Reform of the Liturgy 1948-1975 by Annibale Bugnini. He was the priest and bishop who in his own words led the drafting of the liturgy document (1960-62), then served as an “expert” during the sessions of Vatican II (1962-1965), and afterwards (1964-1969) he led the implementation of the proposed reforms in the liturgy, most especially the New Order of Mass, Novus Ordo in Latin.

At the front of the Novus Ordo Missal on our altar is Annibale Bugnini’s signature. Arguably the New Mass is in many ways Bugnini’s Mass. After all, he led the way on it before, during, and after the Council. But for over half a century people have argued that the New Mass is not what the Vatican bishops voted on in 1962.

READ: Bishop Mutsaerts sides with Cdls. Burke, Sarah against Schneider on SSPX consecrations

For example, the bishops did not vote to remove high altars and replace them with tables for priests to stand behind as if they were Lutheran or Methodist ministers. The greater majority of them would have laughed at such a thing. The same goes for Communion in the hand, or women and girls serving at the altar. Those novelties were not put up for votes, yet somehow they were foisted upon the Church in the guise of bringing her “up to date.”

I know this because I read it in Bugnini’s book. In the late 1960s, after liturgical chaos engulfed Europe, with priests making up their own Eucharistic Prayers and giving out Communion in the hand, Bugnini proposed letting the abuse go unchecked. The world’s bishops, in March of 1969, overwhelmingly voted to stop it. The chart showing the vote numbers is on page 647 of his book.

Bugnini’s book contains many other such examples of the actual letter of Vatican II giving way to its “spirit.” That “spirit” can perhaps be found in paragraph 40 of the 1963 liturgy document on which “radical adaptations” were needed in the liturgy. Very few bishops at the time asked what those adaptations might actually entail.

As mentioned, the liturgy document states Latin is to be retained for Mass. Bugnini wrote or approved of that statement. Yet in 1969 Bugnini pressed for the removal of Latin, railing against its “meaningless sounds.” That’s on page 283.

On the same page he claimed that the unity of language found in Latin was “superficial and fictitious.” So from 1963 to 1969 Bugnini either changed his mind on Latin, or he was out to dupe bishops into voting for a document that could later be manipulated.

In 1975 Annabile Bugnini was exiled to Iran, where with seemingly little to do, the liturgy specialist wrote a 974-page book chronicling his decades-long quest to bring our time-tested and sacred liturgy “up to date.”

GK Chesterton had this to say about “specialists” in 1909:

When [our civilization] wants a library catalogued, or the solar system discovered, or any trifle of that kind, it uses up specialists. But when it wishes anything done which is really serious, it collects twelve of the ordinary men standing round. The same thing was done, if I remember right, by the Founder of Christianity.

I mentioned the French priest I had served Mass for who was ordained by the SSPX. That order has been in the news lately. Unlike most religious orders, the SSPX is growing and is in need of priests. The Vatican, however, is refusing the SSPX’s request to consecrate bishops. The SSPX said it is going to consecrate bishops anyway.

It is quite the unfortunate situation for sure. But is it an intrinsically evil act to ordain bishops without the Pope’s approval? They will be valid bishops, just ordained illicitly. Is it a sin on par, say, with abortion or sodomy? Those things can never be valid. Yet too many in the Church, including those in the highest levels in Rome, appear to not only approve these grave sins but want to bless them (Fiducia Supplicans, 2023).

My friends, we are in a bad spot. While Rome is suppressing the Traditional Roman Rite of Mass and anything that resembles it, it is installing prayer rooms for Muslims at the Vatican. It seems as if the Church is entering a crucifixion mode. If you are aware of the Church’s past and her great traditions, the present state of affairs might make you want to cry. Those in power want you to forget the past. They want the past suppressed. They want a new order of things, a great liturgical reset. They then want you to merely live in the present, so you can be up to date with a world headed for hell.

[All my emphasis.]

Allow me quote Chesterton once again. At least he can make our present catastrophe sound a bit funny. If we are all on our way to crucifixion, I’d rather laugh than cry, wouldn’t you? Listen to Chesterton in 1935 call out the heresy of “up-to-date-ness” known as modernism:

We talk of people living in the past; and it is commonly applied to old people or old-fashioned people. But, in fact, we all live in the past, because there is nothing else to live in. To live in the present is like proposing to sit on a pin. It is too minute, it is too slight a support, it is too uncomfortable a posture, and it is of necessity followed immediately by totally different experiences, analogous to those of jumping up with a yell.

To live in the future is a contradiction in terms. The future is dead; in the perfectly definite sense that it is not alive. It has no nature, no form, no feature. … The past can move and excite us, the past can be loved and hated, the past consists largely of lives that can be considered in their completion, that is, literally in the fulness of life.

My friends, Christ suffered and died so we might have fullness of life. Let us then, as St. Paul urged Timothy, bear our share of hardship for the gospel with the strength that comes from God.

Let us pray for the grace bestowed on us in Christ Jesus before time began (that would be the past). And be so ever grateful that we have a Savior who is always up to date because He is the past, present, and future; a priest yesterday, today, and forever.

(Ordained in 2012, Fr. Kevin Drew is a priest and pastor of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph. He is well regarded for his preaching and evangelization. His daily Mass and homily can be found at Catholic Radio Network.)

End of article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun, and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph, pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla

Thousands Of Clergy Call For Prayer, Justice After Israeli Strike Kills Catholic Priest In Lebanon

 The tragedy of war continues...

From lifesitenews.com, and written by Patrick Delaney Thu Mar 12, 2026 - 5:24 pm EDT: Thousands of clergy call for prayer, justice after Israeli strike kills Catholic priest in Lebanon - LifeSite

"(LifeSiteNews) — A group consisting of thousands of Catholic priests issued a statement mourning the Israeli army’s killing of a brother priest in Lebanon earlier this week, demanding accountability “before international justice” and calling for a day of prayer and fasting on Friday.

“Priests Against Genocide” is an organization that came into being last year denouncing Israel’s ongoing genocide against the civilian population of Gaza, including “the war crimes, ethnic cleansing,” and “the use of starvation as a weapon of extermination.”

A spokesperson for the network of clergy told LifeSiteNews that members currently include “2,200 priests in 59 countries, including two cardinals and 25 bishops/archbishops.”

“We express our deepest and most heartfelt condolences for the killing of Father Pierre Al-Rahi, parish priest of St. George in Qlayaa, southern Lebanon, torn from his land and his people on March 9 by an attack by the Israeli army,” the statement opened.

READ: Catholic priest killed by Israeli bombing in Lebanon

Expressing solidarity with the Christian communities in southern Lebanon, with candor the priests described that “Father Pierre did not die as a result of a tragic mistake but while carrying out the highest evangelical mandate: helping his neighbor,” the group decried. “After a tank fired a first shot at a house, the priest rushed to the scene with some young people to help the wounded. It was then that a second shot struck him fatally.”

“This double-tap, which deliberately targets rescuers, is a brutal violation of humanitarian law,” the priest association emphasized. “Father Pierre, 50, had chosen not to abandon his flock despite evacuation orders, bearing witness that faith does not flee in the face of threat.”

Israeli crimes a ‘scandal that cries out for vengeance before God’

Emphasizing that the priests “cannot remain silent,” they observed that Israel’s commission of atrocities in Lebanon “are a continuation of the carnage that is ravaging Palestine.”

“The current Israeli government, which orders and carries out these attacks against civilians, children, and ministers of God, must be held accountable for its actions before international justice,” the organization demanded.

In November 2024, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense chief Yoav Gallant “for crimes against humanity and war crimes,” including “starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts.”

Continuing, the priests deplored that the “impunity enjoyed by those who use the ‘logic of the strongest’ is a scandal that cries out for vengeance before God.”

They also denounced the ethnic cleansing being inflicted upon the southern population of Lebanon by the U.S.-backed Israeli army along with the ongoing annexation and disappearance of villages.

Official reports indicate registered displaced persons in Lebanon is currently 780,000 of a total population totaling 5.8 million (13.4%).

READ: Mike Huckabee ignites diplomatic firestorm stating extensive Israeli expansion would be ‘fine’

Echoing the words of Pope Leo XIV, the network of clergy asked that “the roar of bombs cease,” pleading that “space be opened for true dialogue,” and emphasizing that war “is never the solution, but a defeat for all humanity.”

The priests went on to invite all communities to participate in a Day of Prayer and Fasting on Friday, March 13.

“Our only weapons remain faith, the desire for peace, and hope in the resurrection, as Father Pierre himself said shortly before his death,” the statement recalls.

Israeli-US aggression against Iran condemned ‘in the strongest possible terms’

As U.S.-backed Israeli airstrikes continue throughout Lebanon, the nation’s health ministry updated its death figures on Wednesday, reporting 570 Lebanese killed in the last 1 1/2 weeks.

Included are 439 men, 45 women, and 86 children, with 14 of the slain being health workers in the line of duty.

Additionally, the “Priests Against Genocide” spokesperson emphasized to LifeSiteNews that the organization condemns the aggressions of the United States and Israel against Iran “in the strongest possible terms.”

“We state clearly that such military strikes are not justifiable as ‘preventive defense.’ Using the pretext of prevention to launch attacks on sovereign nations only serves to escalate the cycle of hatred and destabilization,” the priests said. “True defense is found in the pursuit of peace and the protection of the innocent, not in the proactive spread of war.”

“This aggression against Iran, much like the violence in Lebanon and Palestine, is a defeat for all humanity,” the group implored before once again, inviting all to join in the day of prayer and fasting for peace on Friday.

End of article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun, and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph, pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla

RELATED:

1,100+ priests, 11 bishops denounce Israel’s ‘genocide’ of Gaza, call for disarmament

US missile strike killing over 150 children at Iran school caused by outdated intel: report

Trump says decision to strike Iran influenced by Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, Pete Hegseth

Veteran shouting ‘No one wants to fight for Israel’ injured during Capitol protest

Marco Rubio, Mike Johnson, Tucker Carlson indicate Israel steered US into war against Iran

Iran War spinning out of control: Is the Middle East on the brink?

EXCLUSIVE: Col. Macgregor says ‘Iran presents no threat to the USA’

IRAN WAR much closer to WWIII than you might think

Christians across the Middle East suffer as Iran war spreads ‘fear,’ instability

‘No medical explanation’: Two miracles attributed to St. Charbel this year so far

‘Faith in a Time of Genocide’: Holy Land Christians call for solidarity, repudiation of Zionism

How do Christians in the Holy Land understand the Israeli occupation of Palestine?

Tucker Carlson: Americans ‘marinate in lies’ from Israel’s ‘incredibly sophisticated propaganda’