It is absolutely necessary to read this article and listen to the 22-minute video by John-Henry Weston.
If these monsters are allowed to carry out their anti-life, anti-Christ agenda, then we will get what we deserve, and the chastisement will only get worse -- much worse!
The elite, globalist crazies are trying desperately to start World War IIIbefore President Trump takes office in January...
This not hyperbole...
Here is an article from lifesitenews.com and written by AntoninoCambria
"(LifeSiteNews) — Mark Rutte, the secretary general of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), told members that now is the “time to shift to a wartime mindset” and prioritize defense spending and production in an ominous message on Thursday.
Rutte said that Europe is not prepared for what’s coming over the next four to five years and must prepare for a war similar to or greater than the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The NATO chief’s message follows the recent escalation of war in Europe and the Middle East.
“It is time to shift to a wartime mindset, and turbocharge our defense production and defense spending,” said Rutte, the aggressively pro-LGBT former prime minister of the Netherlands who previously vowed to “bring Hungary to its knees” after the country banned LGBT propaganda for children.
“We are not ready for what is coming our way in the next four to five years. Danger is moving towards us at full speed. We must not look the other way; we must face it. What is happening in Ukraine can happen here, too. And regardless of the outcome of this war, we will not be safe in the future unless we are prepared to deal with danger,” he claimed.
“We can do that; we can prevent the next big war on NATO territory and preserve our way of life. This requires us all to be faster and fiercer,” he added.
Rutte’s eerie message follows weeks of escalation toward war in Europe and across the globe.
The Middle East, too, has experienced recent escalation toward war. In just the last week, the Assad government was deposed by U.S. and Israeli-backed “rebels,” who are really Islamist terrorists responsible for the mass slaughter of Christians in the region."
This in-your-face apostate proponent of the slaughter of the pre-born "...said she has appealed to Rome for a decision concerning San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone’s ban on her receiving the Holy Eucharist due to her public support for abortion."
This demonic female has been receiving Holy Communion for decades in defiance of Church teaching, committing the mortal sin of sacrilege over and over and over again!
Is she feeling some heat, if so, from whom?
Maybe her conscience, finally?
Look, she is 84 years old and not getting any younger. Is there a slim chance that she is finally realizing that she will meet her Maker within the next few years? But does she even believe that she will be held accountable for her actions on the "issue" of pre-born life?
I have my doubts, but who knows?
Here is that article: Thu Dec 12, 2024 - 11:14 am EST
"(LifeSiteNews) — Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi said she has appealed to Rome for a decision concerning San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone’s ban on her receiving the Holy Eucharist due to her public support for abortion.
“My understanding, as long as Rome has the case, it hasn’t been resolved,” Pelosi, the former speaker of the House, told National Catholic Reporter in comments published this morning. She recently told the heretical outlet that she continues to receive the Holy Eucharist despite Archbishop Cordileone’s announcement in May 2022 that she was to refrain from receiving Communion in the archdiocese.
“I received Communion anyway. That’s his problem, not mine,” she said. “My Catholic faith is, Christ is my savior. It has nothing to do with the bishops.”
“I’ve never been denied. I’ve been to Catholic churches all over the country, and I’ve never been denied,” she also said.
Late on December 10, Archbishop Cordileone issued a statement in response to Pelosi’s latest comments. The Democratic politician has defied the Church’s prohibition on receiving Communion while publicly supporting abortion, including famously receiving the Eucharist at a papal Mass soon after the archbishop’s decree.
Pelosi also strongly supports other grave evils condemned by the Church, such as contraception, in vitro fertilization (IVF), homosexuality, and transgenderism, including “gender transitions” for children, and has opposed religious exemptions for abortion and other immoral practices, as well as parental rights.
“First and foremost, I would like to renew my request for prayers for the Speaker’s conversion on the issue of human life in the womb, that it be consistent with the respect for human dignity she displays in so many other contexts,” the conservative prelate stated on December 10.
Citing the Book of Ezekiel, Archbishop Cordileone stated:
As a pastor of souls, my overriding concern and chief responsibility is the salvation of souls. And as Ezekiel reminds us, for a pastor to fulfill his calling, he has the duty not only to teach, console, heal and forgive, but also, when necessary, to correct, admonish and call to conversion. One of the most the effective ways for a pastor to accomplish these duties is by way of dialogue, honest dialogue, where each party listens openly and honestly, seeking to understand the other, and being honest with one’s own self.
My own personal experience has taught me that this kind of dialogue can dispel misperceptions and melt away hostilities, and build new bonds of friendship. I therefore earnestly repeat once again my plea to Speaker Pelosi to allow this kind of dialogue to happen.
I ask this not only to dialogue in areas of disagreement, such as if and when it can ever be morally permissible to kill innocent human life, but also in other critical areas where our views on behalf of human life and dignity are aligned, especially threats to religious liberty internationally and the plight of immigrants domestically. This should not be a problem, as Catholics are not afraid of the truth.
“(Y)ou are not to present yourself for Holy Communion and, should you do so, you are not to be admitted to Holy Communion, until such time as you (publicly) repudiate your advocacy for the legitimacy of abortion and confess and receive absolution of this grave sin in the sacrament of Penance,” Archbishop Cordileone wrote to Pelosi in May 2022.
“A Catholic legislator who supports procured abortion, after knowing the teaching of the Church, commits a manifestly grave sin which is a cause of most serious scandal to others. Therefore, universal Church law provides that such persons ‘are not to be admitted to Holy Communion’ (Code of Canon Law, can. 915),” he said.
While National Catholic Reporter called Canon 915 an “obscure provision,” it is a well-established truth of the Catholic faith that public advocacy for abortion should prohibit someone from receiving the Holy Eucharist, whether or not someone is a canonist.
The Catholic Church teaches that the Eucharist is the literal Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ and that no Catholic who has committed a mortal sin is to present himself or herself for Holy Communion until he or she has confessed that sin in the Sacrament of Confession.
“Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable,” the Catechism of the Catholic Church states. “Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law.”
“In the case of an intrinsically unjust law, such as a law permitting abortion or euthanasia, it is therefore never licit to obey it, or to ‘take part in a propaganda campaign in favor of such a law, or vote for it,’” Pope St. John Paul II taught in Evangelium Vitae.
A 2004 memo to the U.S. bishops from then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI, states that “consistently campaigning and voting for permissive abortion and euthanasia laws” requires denial of Communion.
Public support for abortion is also considered a mortal sin due to the scandal it promotes and because it could lead others into the grave and excommunicable sin of abortion.
By presenting herself as a Catholic, while obstinately supporting the intentional destruction of innocent human life, Pelosi is creating scandal.
Pelosi has regularly displayed a lack of basic understanding about the concept of sin. For example, she called pro-life protections for innocent babies “sinful” and claimed that protecting unborn babies is “an assault” on women.
“The fact that this is such an assault on women of color and … lower income families is just sinful. It’s sinful,” Pelosi said at an event in August 2022.
“It’s wrong that they would be able to say to women what they think women should be doing with their lives and their bodies. But it’s sinful, the injustice of it all.”'
End of article...
What twisted arrogance and pride!
Pray for her conversion!
Viva Cristo Rey! Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...
Question: why doesn't the good Archbishop publicly ex-communicate this radical supporter of the slaughter of the pre-born?
What is he afraid of?
Public backlash??
Bad publicity???
His life????
What is his reason?????
A public ex-communication could work wonders and send a much-needed message to the rest of the cabal of apostate Catholics, not only in the remaining days of the cabinet of the apostate-in-charge, Biden, but also to all abortion-supporting "Catholics" across the fruited plain, and dare I say, around the world?
Here is a very telling article of pride and arrogance publicly displayed by Pelosi, from lifesitenews.com and written by MichaelHaynes,Snr.VaticanCorrespondent
"SAN FRANCISCO (LifeSiteNews) — San Francisco’s Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone has responded to Nancy Pelosi’s rejection of his ban on her receiving Holy Communion, urging Catholics to pray for her “conversion on the issue of human life in the womb.”
Late on December 10, Archbishop Cordileone issued a statement in response to a recent interview former Speaker of the House gave to the dissident National Catholic Reporter (NCR).
The prolifically pro-abortion Democratic politician told NCR that despite her bishop having explicitly banned her from presenting herself for Communion in his archdiocese, “I received Communion anyway.”
“That’s his problem, not mine,” she added. “My Catholic faith is, Christ is my savior. It has nothing to do with the bishops.”
“Nancy Pelosi’s recent interview with the National Catholic Reporter has elicited a number of requests of me to offer a comment on it,” Cordileone began. “First and foremost, I would like to renew my request for prayers for the Speaker’s conversion on the issue of human life in the womb, that it be consistent with the respect for human dignity she displays in so many other contexts.”
The San Francisco prelate drew from Scripture, making an apparent warning for Pelosi’s spiritual welfare if she continued to present herself for Holy Communion:
As for myself, what immediately comes to my mind are the words of the prophet Ezekiel: ‘If the just turn away from their right conduct and do evil when I place a stumbling block before them, then they shall die. Since you did not warn them about their sin, they shall still die, and the just deeds that they performed will not be remembered on their behalf. I will, however, hold you responsible for their blood. If, on the other hand, you warn the just to avoid sin, and they do not sin, they will surely live because of the warning, and you in turn shall save your own life.’ (Ez 3:20-21)
Cordileone continued:
As a pastor of souls, my overriding concern and chief responsibility is the salvation of souls. And as Ezekiel reminds us, for a pastor to fulfill his calling, he has the duty not only to teach, console, heal and forgive, but also, when necessary, to correct, admonish and call to conversion. One of the most the effective ways for a pastor to accomplish these duties is by way of dialogue, honest dialogue, where each party listens openly and honestly, seeking to understand the other, and being honest with one’s own self.
My own personal experience has taught me that this kind of dialogue can dispel misperceptions and melt away hostilities, and build new bonds of friendship. I therefore earnestly repeat once again my plea to Speaker Pelosi to allow this kind of dialogue to happen.
I ask this not only to dialogue in areas of disagreement, such as if and when it can ever be morally permissible to kill innocent human life, but also in other critical areas where our views on behalf of human life and dignity are aligned, especially threats to religious liberty internationally and the plight of immigrants domestically. This should not be a problem, as Catholics are not afraid of the truth.”
In May 2022, Cordileone banned Pelosi from presenting herself for Holy Communion due to her public, continued support for abortion. Despite this, Pelosi continued to receive Holy Communion at public Masses since Cordileone’s declaration, notably at the Vatican on June 29 of that same year.
Pope Francis defended his decision to allow Pelosi to receive Communion by appealing to a need to be “pastoral.”
Cordileone’s 2022 statement caused waves in the US ecclesiastical and political spheres, serving to also highlight the divide amongst the U.S. Catholic bishops as some issued letters of support and many more remained silent.
The Catholic Church teaches that abortion is always wrong because it kills an innocent human being, thus violating the Church’s prohibition on murder, a teaching which “remains unchangeable.”
“Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense,” reads the Catechism of the Catholic Church. “The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life.”
Furthermore, the Church’s Canon Law 915 stipulates that under no circumstances are those who persist in manifest grave sin to receive the Holy Eucharist. “Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.”
It was based on this very directive of Canon Law that Fr. Robert E. Morey of St. Anthony Catholic Church in Florence, South Carolina, famously refused to give Biden Holy Communion in 2019. In comments to media in the aftermath, Morey explained his reasons: “Holy Communion signifies we are one with God, each other and the Church. Our actions should reflect that.”
“Any public figure who advocates for abortion places himself or herself outside of Church teaching,” he added.
Biden, despite his own prolific support for abortion, has also received support from Pope Francis as regards being admitted to Holy Communion."
This story is developing…
End of article...
And, as Archbishop Cordileone requests, we should pray for the conversion of Pelosi and all fallen-away Catholics, that they return to orthodoxy and the Catholic faith!
Pray too for strength and honor!
Viva Cristo Rey! Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...
Keep in mind that Bergoglio just made this character a "cardinal," that is, if you believe in fairy tales...
As the evidence piles up that those numerous males in the hierarchy of the new, novus ordo, synodal "church" are homosexuals and Freemasons, it becomes more difficult for the pope-spainers to justify with their verbal gymnastics, to attempt to align Bergoglio with church teachings! Of course, this is total lunacy!
Here is the subheading of the article: Speaking to LifeSite's Vatican correspondent on the sidelines of the consistory, the English cardinal defended his controversial 2013 text in which he likened same-sex activity to Christ's gift of self in the Holy Eucharist.
"VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Cardinal Timothy Radcliffe, O.P., sought to clarify and defend one of his most controversial writings on homosexuality in which he likened same-sex activity to Christ’s self-gift and added that the Church needs to have a more general principle of “welcome” for LGBT people.
Speaking in an interview with LifeSiteNews on the day before he was created a cardinal on December 7, Radcliffe responded to a question about one of his most controversial passages. (Full transcript of the interview is found at the end of this report.)
In Radcliffe’s contribution to the 2013 Anglican Pilling Report, he weighed in on the topical issue of same-sex “marriage,” appearing to liken homosexual activity to “Christ’s self-gift.”
He wrote that not every marriage is fertile and that we must avoid a “mechanical or simplistic” understanding of fertility. Jesus “is God’s fertile word. And surely it is in the kind and healing words that we offer each other that we all share in fertility of that most intimate moment.”
Continuing, Radcliffe appeared to positively compare same-sex activity with Christ’s gift of Himself in the Eucharist:
How does all of this bear on the question of gay sexuality? We cannot begin with the question of whether it is permitted or forbidden! We must ask what it means, and how far it is Eucharistic. Certainly, it can be generous, vulnerable, tender, mutual and non-violent. So, in many ways, I would think that it can be expressive of Christ’s self-gift. We can also see how it can be expressive of mutual fidelity, a covenantal relationship in which two people bind themselves to each other forever.
And what about fertility? … Biological fertility is inseparable from the fertility of our mutual tenderness and compassion. And so that might seem to remove one objection to gay marriage. I am not entirely convinced, since it seems to me that our tradition is incarnational, the word becoming bodily flesh. And some heterosexual relationships may be accidentally infertile in this sense, but homosexual ones are intrinsically so.
We can also see how homosexuality can be expressive of mutual fidelity, a covenantal relationship in which two people bind themselves to each other forever. But the proposed legislation for “gay marriage” implies that it is not understood to be inherently unitive, a becoming one flesh. This is why no equivalence is proposed either for nonconsummation, the becoming one flesh, nor for adultery, which is the denial of that bond.
These words from the former master of the Dominican Order were again highlighted by numerous Catholic news outlets in recent weeks when Pope Francis announced the priest would be elevated to the College of Cardinals. Attention was given to Radcliffe’s apparent likening of same-sex activity – which the Church teaches is disordered in itself – to Christ’s pure and complete gift of self in the Eucharist.
Questioned by LifeSiteNews in Rome, Radcliffe stated that the passage had been misunderstood.
The issue at hand, he said, was about “gay marriage. And what I had to look at was if the model of sexual ethics is Christ’s self-gift in the Eucharist, which is forever and opens up a whole new world. In the end, I decided that was the point of it.”
Radcliffe lamented that “very few people saw the point of what I was making is why I don’t think you can have gay marriages, because they are not open to fertility in that way.” Because same-sex activity is not “generative,” this meant “gay marriage” was impossible, Radcliffe added.
“But what happens often is people alight on a phrase, take it out of its context, and then try and weaponize it. Alas, that happens all the time.”
Radcliffe was one of the regular celebrants for the “LGBT Masses” held in London, the notorious “Soho Masses.” His record is notable for being widely permissive to the LGBT cause and for opposing previous Vatican documents on the matter.
Shortly before the Vatican issued its 2005 document reaffirming the ban on admitting men with “homosexual tendencies” into seminaries, Radcliffe publicly objected to the predicted ban. Writing in the London Times, Radcliffe argued that “(a]ny deep-rooted prejudice against others, such as homophobia or misogyny, would be grounds for rejecting a candidate for the priesthood, but not their sexual orientation.”
Then, in an article for The Tablet, he said, “I have no doubt that God does call homosexuals to the priesthood, and they are among the most dedicated and impressive priests I have met.”
He also wrote in 2012 defending the Church teaching that same-sex “marriage” is impossible, but adding:
This is not to denigrate committed love of people of the same sex. This too should be cherished and supported, which is why church leaders are slowly coming to support same-sex civil unions. The God of love can be present in every true love.
Questioned by LifeSiteNews as to what Catholic outreach to LGBT individuals might look like, Radcliffe replied that “generally speaking, the main thing that we have to do is to say, ‘you’re welcome.’”
Referencing his celebration of the Soho Masses, Radcliffe stated that “just as when people come to Mass: if they come up to Communion, married people, I don’t ask them whether they’re being faithful. I don’t ask them what they do in bed.”
Instead, he commented that “I say, ‘You’re welcome.’ It’s up to them and their confessors as they face God, that’s where those questions are raised. Our question is simply to be there with them, welcoming as best we can.”
Under the leadership of Cardinal Ratzinger in 1986, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) issued a document instructing bishops on the pastoral care of homosexual persons. The CDF admonished bishops to ensure they and any “pastoral programme” in the diocese are “clearly stating that homosexual activity is immoral.”
Such an authentic pastoral approach would “assist homosexual persons at all levels of the spiritual life: through the sacraments, and in particular through the frequent and sincere use of the sacrament of Reconciliation, through prayer, witness, counsel and individual care,” the CDF stated.
The instruction adds:
But we wish to make it clear that departure from the Church’s teaching, or silence about it, in an effort to provide pastoral care is neither caring nor pastoral. Only what is true can ultimately be pastoral. The neglect of the Church’s position prevents homosexual men and women from receiving the care they need and deserve.
Therefore, special concern and pastoral attention should be directed toward those who have this condition, lest they be led to believe that the living out of this orientation in homosexual activity is a morally acceptable option. It is not.
Meanwhile the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered” and “contrary to the natural law.” The catechism is very clear that homosexual activity can never be approved and repeats that “(h)omosexual persons are called to chastity.”
LifeSite’s full interview with Cardinal Radcliffe is below:
MichaelHaynes: We now have four cardinals from England, which is quite a lot for a small country.
Cardinal Timothy Radcliffe, O.P.: I think it’s the first time ever.
MH: Is there something you think the Holy Father sees in the English characteristic that he wants?
TR: I don’t think so. Of course, (there is) the wonderful Vincent (Nichols) naturally as Archbishop of Westminster. Arthur (Roche – head of Dicastery for Divine Worship), because of his great gifts.
I think Cardinal Michael (Fitzgerald) – because of his international experience working in dialogue with Islam all over the world. And I’ve been very happy and blessed to have that international experience as the Master of the Order. So we all have international experience, I think, rather than being English.
MH: Something which has been raised in a few reports since you were named cardinal is your contribution to the Pilling Report, about human sexual ethics. You mentioned how I think same sex activity could be expressive of Christ’s self giving. It’s caused a lot of consternation recently. Could you expand on this?
TR: I think I could. The question – it was not a general view of sexual ethics – the question was about gay marriage. And what I had to look at was if the model of sexual ethics is Christ’s self gift in the Eucharist, which is forever and opens up a whole new world.
In the end, I decided that was the point of it. Very few people saw the point of what I was making is why I don’t think you can have gay marriages, because they are not open to fertility in that way.
Every sacrament blesses some aspect of being alive. So whether it’s baptism, (which) blesses that we are born, we eat and drink, the whole of our human physical life is blessed.
The point of that interview was to show that part of life in this planet is the fact that it is generative through sexual differences of new forms, and that was not possible, which is why you can never have gay marriages.
But what happens often is people alight on a phrase, take it out of its context, and then try and weaponize it. Alas, that happens all the time.
MH: What do you think then, in light of that and in current society – where we see a lot of lot of changes in cultural norms – how do you think the Church can have a good outreach to LGBT individuals?
TR: I think that, generally speaking, the main thing that we have to do is to say “you’re welcome.”
I was asked by Cardinal Murphy O’Connor to preside at a Mass which is especially open to gay people (London’s LGBT ‘Soho Masses’). I did so as long as he wished, and the question of sexual ethics almost never came up.
People come all they want is you to say “hello, you’re welcome.” That’s what people want. Just as when people come to Mass: if they come up to Communion, married people, I don’t ask them whether they’re being faithful. I don’t ask them what they do in bed. I say, “You’re welcome.” It’s up to them and their confessors as they face God, that’s where those questions are raised. Our question is simply to be there with them, welcoming as best we can."
End of very disturbing article...
Our Lord tells us in the Bible, that by their fruits you will know them...
Pray for strength and honor!
Viva Cristo Rey! Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...
This brief, less than 19-minute video, seems to set the record straight about his P.O.W. status after his jet fighter was shot down by a SAM missile...
Please take the time to watch and judge for yourself...
