Parents: Protect Your Children From This Evil And Wicked Male Who Claims To Be A Female: "Admiral" "Rachel" -- RICHARD -- Levine.

 Here is the subtitle to the article below: REVEALED: Rachel Levine Successfully Pressured Medical Experts to Promote Child Sex Changes

The article is from thegatewaypundit.com and written by Ben Kew: REVEALED: Rachel Levine Successfully Pressured Medical Experts to Promote Child Sex Changes | The Gateway Pundit | by Ben Kew

Let's be clear: "Rachel's" real name -- his male name! -- is Richard Levine...

Before I post the full article, it is imperative to point out that the current "administration" is being run by an apostate "Catholic" -- a traitor to God he claims to love -- and to the Natural Law.  

These evil and wicked Marxists will stop at nothing to confuse and mutilate the young to form them into -- what, exactly????

We cannot let these modernist globalist monsters get away with this Frankenstein-type lunacy!!

One thing that bothers me about this article -- there are many, is that the supposed "conservative" thegatewaypundit.com folks continue to use the female name of this possessed lunatic, instead of his real male name!  

And you see, that is part of the problem: a false "conservatism"...

What is it, exactly, are they conserving?

Certainly not the moral and spiritual traditions handed down from our fathers and mothers, grandfathers and grandmothers -- and authentic Church teachings.

So, what else can it be??? 

The point is, is that most of those who claim to be "conservatives" are really the liberals of the 1960s.  And the liberals of the 60s are now full-blown Marxists...

And if President Trump does not get elected in November, this beloved country of ours will, in fact, go full-blown Red Commie!

If I'm wrong, I'll eat my words...

"The Biden regime’s most senior ["]transgender["] official attempted to pressure a group of medical experts to scrap the lower age limit for ["]transgender["] surgeries, it has been revealed.

Admiral Rachel -- Richard -- Levine, the ["]transgender["] assistant secretary for health at the Department of Health and Human Services, demanded back in 2021 that the World Professional Association for ["]Transgender["] Health alter its draft guidelines to allow children to access sex change surgeries before they hit puberty.

At the time of Levine’s demands, the WPATH recommended age minimums of 14 for hormone treatment, 15 for mastectomies, 16 for breast augmentation, and 17 for genital surgeries.

Yet according to court filings in Alabama, where ["]transgender["] advocates are challenging a ban on child sex changes, Levine pressured doctors to change their guidance to allow pre-pubescent children to get irreversible mutilations.

“We sent the document to Admiral Levine … ["]She["] like[s] the SOC-8 very much but ["]she["] was very concerned that having ages (mainly for surgery) will affect access to health care for trans youth and maybe adults too,” one WPATH member wrote in an internal email.

“Apparently the situation in the USA is terrible and [Levine] and the Biden administration worried that having ages in the document will make matters worse,” they continued. “She asked us to remove them.”

In a separate email, another WPATH member revealed how Levine’s chief of staff, Sarah Boateng, had argued that the guidelines would be “devastating” for ["]transgender["] youth.

[“]She["] is confident, based on the rhetoric ["]she["] is hearing in D.C., and from what we have already seen, that these specific listings of ages, under 18, will result in devastating legislation for trans care,” she wrote. [“]She["] wonders if the specific ages can be taken out.”

Levine’s pressure campaign was ultimately successful.

“[W]e heard your comments regarding the minimal age criteria for transgender healthcare adolescents; the potential negative outcome of these minimal ages as recommendations in the U.S.,” a WPATH member wrote in an email to Levine. Consequently, we have changes to the SOC 8 in this respect.”

The excerpts were submitted by James Cantor, a psychologist and long-time critic of child sex changes, to argue that WPATH was basing its guidelines on political ideology rather than scientific evidence.

Last year, Levine claimed that child sex changes had the “highest support” of the Biden administration.

“I think the next two years are going to be challenging,” Levine said at the time. “But I am positive and optimistic and hopeful that the wheel will turn after that and that this issue won’t be as politically and socially such a minefield.”

End of article...

Note: As you can see, I inserted most of the brackets and air quotes around many words to emphasis their falsity...

Pray for the defeat of these monsters -- and for their conversion!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla   

 

Is The Institute Of Christ The King Sovereign Priest Safe From The Latin Mass -- Continuing -- Crackdown And Ban??

  I hope so...

The following article was just posted over at lifesitenews.com and written by Louis Knuffke: Pope Francis affirms charism of Latin Mass order Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

Here is the sub-headline of the article: "The Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest, which exclusively celebrates the Traditional Latin Mass, said Pope Francis ‘insisted that we continue to serve the Church according to our own, proper charism’ after a private audience with the order’s superiors on June 24."

Here is the full article: VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Pope Francis has confirmed to the superiors of the traditional Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest (ICKSP) that they are to continue their work according to their own proper charism, which includes the exclusive celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass.

ICKSP announced that, “On the 24th June 2024, the 45th anniversary of his Priestly Ordination by Saint John Paul II, Monsignor Gilles Wach, Prior General of our Institute, was received in private audience by His Holiness Pope Francis, accompanied by Monsignor Rudolf Michael Schmitz, vicar general of the Institute, and by Canon Louis Valadier, provincial of France.”

This audience was an occasion to thank the Holy Father for his inspiring Apostolic Letter, Totum amoris est, dedicated to Saint Francis de Sales, our Patron Saint. Monseigneur Wach was also able to present all the pastoral work carried out by the priests of the Institute throughout the world in the service of souls.

On two occasions, the Pope insisted that we continue to serve the Church according to our own, proper charism, in the spirit of unity and communion which the harmony and balance of the Salesian spirituality allow. The Holy Father also expressed his gratitude for the prayers and for the apostolic and missionary work of the Sister Adorers, as well as for the generous dedication of the oblates.

At the end of the meeting, the Holy Father invited our Prior General to visit him again with all the members of the Institute, as well as the Sister Adorers, whom he would be very happy to receive in audience.

Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest superiors meet with Pope Francis, June 24, 2024

The ICKSP states on its website that part of the order’s charism is to promote the beauty of the Church’s sacred traditions in the liturgy by exclusively offering the Traditional Latin Mass.

“The Institute of Christ the King celebrates the classical Roman Liturgy, the ‘Latin Mass,’ in its traditional form according to the liturgical books promulgated in 1962 by Pope Saint John XXIII,” the website states. “During his pontificate, Pope Saint John Paul II exhorted bishops to be generous in allowing its use. It was with his blessing that the Institute began to celebrate the Traditional Mass.”

Pope Francis’ confirmation of the charism of the Institute of Christ the King comes as reports have circulated that Rome is considering an imminent suppression of the Traditional Latin Mass “in a manner ‘as wide, final, and irreversible as possible.’”

READ: Reports: Vatican planning to enforce a ‘final’ ban of Traditional Latin Mass, likely on July 16

Rome has also blocked the ordinations of five seminarians in the French religious community of the Missionaries of Divine Mercy. The seminarians, who have already been ordained subdeacons, have been waiting as long as two years for their ordination to the diaconate on their path to the priesthood. The reason for the holdup in Rome has now become clear: an attachment to the Traditional Roman Rite of the Catholic Church.

On the other hand, Pope Francis has more than once confirmed the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (FSSP) in its exclusive use of the traditional “Tridentine” Mass. The superior of the Institute of the Good Pastor also received a personal encouragement from Pope Francis during a public audience in November 2022 after the publication of Traditionis custodes, which severely limits the use of the ancient rite. And only recently, on May 25, the Priory of San Benedetto of the Benedictines of Norcia in Italy, who celebrate the traditional liturgy, was elevated to the status of an abbey.

READ: Heterodox theologian allegedly behind Latin Mass restrictions calls traditional Catholics a ‘sect’

Commenting on the universal attractiveness of the Traditional Latin Mass, especially among the young, ICKSP says on its website, “More and more young people, who have never before experienced the profundity and beauty of the traditional liturgy, are deeply moved by their first encounter with it and are everywhere requesting its wider use. It is very gratifying to see how the apostolates of the Institute, as well as those of other communities where the Traditional Mass is celebrated, are frequented by young families and young people attracted by the force of tradition itself.”

ICKSP insists that its aim is give these young Catholic families “the opportunity to know the classical Roman Liturgy because, for so many, they find it strengthens their faith, helps them in their struggle to lead a Christian life in the world of today, and intensifies their attachment to the Church and to the Holy Father.”

Explaining the love for and attentiveness to the beauty and dignity of the liturgy that their founder has instilled in the priestly institute, ICKSP states, “The founder of the Institute of Christ the King, Monsignor Gilles Wach, STD, frequently underlines that the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is like a diamond that needs a dignified, beautiful setting to show even more its value and brilliance.”

“For this reason, the Institute strives to surround the Holy Sacrifice with perfectly traditional Catholic teaching and the utmost beauty and solemnity of the rite. Truth, liturgy, and charity should form an ever-greater harmony to render evident the sacramental power and riches of grace present in the Holy Mass.”

RELATED

Cardinal Burke: Pope Francis’ Latin Mass restrictions have had ‘exactly the opposite effect’

Archbishop Cordileone to offer Traditional Latin Mass during National Eucharistic Congress

FSSP ordains 11 new priests to celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass

End of article...

We all know that the Traditional Latin Mass is the most beautiful thing this side of Heaven!

It would be a horrible shame if the Mass of the ages is somehow taken away from us!

That wonderful Mass has already been banned or severely restricted in many parts of the world, including France, England and the U.S.

Unfortunately, there are far too many bishops that despise the TLM and are more than happy to stop it -- or try to eradicate it from their diocese... This is like cutting one's nose off to spite one's face!!!

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 

Do You Believe In Miracles? Want To Hear About Two Recent Miracles That Will Never Be -- Officially -- Recognized Plus, Conversions??

  No matter what you may think or believe about Fr. James Altman, get ready to hear about two recent miracles, one concerning a damaged heart and the other about a serious threat to the esophagus.

The following 19-minute video of Fr. Altman being interviewed should give pause to the power of prayer! 

Fr Altman: Health Update, AUSCP, Amazing Catholic Conversions (youtube.com)

I will let the video speak for itself...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!!

Gene DeLalla 

Faithful Chinese Catholics Will Be Thrown Under The Bus -- AGAIN! -- By The Diabolical Deal Between Apostate Rome And The Red Chinese Commies!!!

  Any right thinking, practicing Catholic can no longer deny that the novus ordo powers that be in the Vatican are either Marxists themselves or just plain vincibly ignorant of their actions that are assisting the commies in wiping out the true Catholic religion, once and for all, in Red China.

Here is the headline from an article in lifesitenews.com and written by Andreas Wailzer and Michael Haynes, Snr. Vatican Correspondent: Cardinal Pietro Parolin says the Vatican continues to ‘dialogue’ with Communist China and plans to renew its secretive deal with Beijing yet again, despite the widely criticized deal leading to increased persecution of the faithful Church in China.

Here is a link to the full article (which I will post here): Cardinal Parolin says infamous Vatican-China deal will be renewed at end of 2024 - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

But why is this happening?

Remember, at the robber, Second Vatican Council, the horrors of communism were neither discussed or mentioned, nor was it in any of the final documents.

Was this by agreement?

If so, why?

Now we can see the ongoing results of that appeasement, that treason, which has devastated the faithful Catholics in Communist China.

The article: "VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Cardinal Pietro Parolin has announced that the Vatican will renew its heavily criticized secret deal with Communist China at the end of this year.

During a presentation of the book Cardinal Celso Costantini and China – Constructor of a “bridge” between the East and West on Thursday at Rome’s Pontifical Urban University, Parolin told journalists, “With China, we are dialoguing as we have been for some time.”

READ: Cardinal Zen torches the Vatican and his critics over China deal

“We are trying to find the best procedures also for the application of the Agreement signed at the time and which will be renewed at the end of this year,” the Vatican secretary of state said.

Parolin also signaled that Pope Francis would be willing to visit China but added that this does not seem realistic at this point.

“Certainly the Pope is willing to go to China, indeed he wishes to go to China,” he said. “It does not seem to me that, so far, there are the conditions for this wish of the Pope to come to fruition.”

The Vatican secretary of state alluded to alleged “positive developments” resulting from the Vatican-China deal, which he claimed “give us hope that more and greater ones will follow.”

READ: Pope Francis bows to Communist China and confirms bishop appointed by Beijing

“As a result of the Agreement, all the Bishops in the land of Confucius are in full communion with the Church of Peter,” Parolin said, expressing his desire for a continuation of “the dialogue and the process initiated by Chinese Catholics to foster greater concord under the guidance of their pastors, in full communion with the Pope who has given so much proof of his love for that great people.”

The controversial deal between the Vatican and the Chinese Communist government was first signed in 2018 and renewed in 2020 and 2022.

A shady deal at the expense of faithful Chinese Catholics

The officially secret Vatican-China deal is believed to recognize the state-approved church in China and allows the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to appoint bishops. The Pope apparently maintains veto power, although in practice it is the CCP that has control. It also allegedly allows for the removal of legitimate bishops to be replaced by CCP-approved bishops.

Speaking in July 2023, Parolin defended the secretive nature of the deal, stating that “the text is confidential because it has not yet been finally approved.” The deal, which “revolves around the basic principle of consensuality of decisions affecting bishops,” is effected by “trusting in the wisdom and goodwill of all,” Parolin said.

READ: Pope Francis’ deal with Communist China has led to greater persecution of Catholics

Pope Francis and Parolin have both been vocal in their defense of the agreement, with the Pope stating before its 2022 renewal that the deal “is going well.” Indeed, in a 2018 letter to Chinese Catholics, Francis described the deal as forming a “new chapter of the Catholic Church in China.”

But outside the walls of the Vatican’s Apostolic Palace, criticism has come from Catholic clergy, freedom advocates, China experts, and numerous others.

The highly secretive Sino-Vatican deal has been condemned by Hong Kong emeritus Cardinal Joseph Zen as an “incredible betrayal,” with the much-loved cardinal further accusing the Vatican of “selling out” Chinese Catholics.

In 2018, the prelate called for Parolin to resign, criticizing his “complete surrender” of the Church to the Communist authorities.

“It’s a betrayal of the real Church,” Cardinal Zen then said of the deal in July 2020 before adding: “It’s not an isolated episode. It’s already a long-standing policy of the Vatican not to offend the Chinese government.”

[My emphasis.]

READ: Chinese Catholic bishops and priests remain imprisoned by communist regime despite Vatican deal

The ink had barely dried on the deal in 2018 before AsiaNews, a site that regularly documents the abductions and torturing of underground Catholics, reported that “(u)nderground Catholics bitterly suspect that the Vatican has abandoned them.”

Before the first renewal of the deal in 2020, then-U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warned that “(t)he Vatican endangers its moral authority, should it renew the deal.” He linked to an article he penned on the subject in which he stated that “it’s clear that the Sino-Vatican agreement has not shielded Catholics from the Party’s depredations.”

Indeed, in the nearly six years since the deal was implemented, persecution of Catholics – particularly the “underground” Catholics who do not accept the state-controlled church – has demonstrably increased.

READ: Catholic diocese of Hong Kong ‘working with CCP’ to effect ‘Sinicization’: report 

The deal has led to a heightened increase in religious persecution, which the U.S. Congressional-Executive Commission on China described as a direct consequence of the deal. In its 2020 report, the Commission wrote that the persecution witnessed is “of an intensity not seen since the Cultural Revolution.”

“All bishops who refuse to join the Catholic Patriotic Association are being placed under house arrest, or disappeared, by the CCP,” China expert Steven Moser told LifeSiteNews earlier this month. “Although the Vatican said several years ago that the Sino-Vatican agreement does not require anyone to join this schismatic organization, refusal to do so results in persecution and punishment. And the Vatican stands by and does nothing.” 

READ: EXCLUSIVE: Cardinal Parolin confirms Vatican aims to renew secretive deal with China this year

The closest the Holy See has come to acknowledging shortcomings with the deal is via its foreign minister, Archbishop Paul Gallagher. The archbishop, who serves as Vatican Secretary for Relations with States and International Organizations, said last year that the deal was “not the best deal possible” due to the “other party.”

Indeed, a series of episcopal appointments since the last renewal of the deal in October 2022 have highlighted the primacy of power wielded by Beijing in the deal. On three known occasions, the CCP appointed new bishops or appointed them to new dioceses, leaving the Vatican to play catch-up with the events and express its diplomatically worded frustration.

New developments in favor of the Vatican in the deal appear, therefore, unlikely. In July 2023, Parolin had stated the Holy See hopes for “the opening of an established liaison office of the Holy See in China” that “would not only favor dialogue with the civil authorities but also contribute to full reconciliation within the Chinese Church and its journey towards a desirable normality.”

RELATED

Pope Francis, Cardinal Parolin to join key CCP-appointed bishop for Sino-Vatican conference

Vatican plans to renew its secretive China deal amid persecution of the underground Church

Pope refuses to defend Cdl. Zen ahead of trial in Communist China, calls for ‘dialogue’

End of article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 

 

Breaking! Archbishop Vigano Meets The Evil Workers Of Iniquity Head On!!

 This man has guts!

Bear with me, as I may make an enemy or two by making a comparison of sorts, with Archbishop Vigano and Fr. Feeney and the ostracism and hate directed at their stand for orthodoxy -- in other words, the truth!

The potential enemy will come from the details in Ab. Vigano's statement that I will post here... All I ask, is that anyone reading this missive, have an open mind and use God-given common sense to see the evil and wicked heterodox emanations that pour from the Vatican, and now especially directed toward the good Archbishop.

So, from an article at catholicism.org and written by BR. FRANCIS MALUF, M.I.C.M., comes this: "...Until a person is willing to say the truth in such a way as to be willing to take the punishment for saying it, he might as well save his breath and keep quiet. (Br. Francis: On St. Matthew’s Gospel — Ch. 11)"

Read the entire article here: On Being Violent - Catholicism.org

Here is Archbishop Vigano's statement on why he did not report to Rome: from lifesitenews.com and written by Archbishop Vigano, EXCLUSIVE: Archbishop Viganò confirms he has not and will not attend Vatican 'schism' trial - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

The following is a statement sent exclusively to LifeSiteNews by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò on Friday, June 21, 2024.

"(LifeSiteNews) — The reports spread by certain media outlets, stating that I presented myself yesterday, Thursday, June 20, at the Palace of the Holy Office, as intimated to me by the Decree of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, is devoid of any foundation. These reports are completely false.

 The Jesuit magazine America, the media arm of the Society of Jesus in the United States and the megaphone of the “church of mercy” of the Jesuit Bergoglio, has rushed ahead, while Vatican News (here) was still totally unaware of the Decree sent to me on June 11, only by a simple email, without respecting those formalities necessary for the validity of the communication of a Decree, and which I myself published on X two hours before the meeting scheduled at the Dicastery. Although all the elements were clearly stated in my communiqué, inferences and speculations took precedence, in typical Jesuit style.

Haste is a bad counselor. Therefore, Gerard O’Connell’s article Archbishop Viganò charged with schism by the Vatican that appeared yesterday at America (here) seems to have been written even before I made the Vatican document public. This reveals the close contiguity between the Vatican apparatus and America magazine and confirms a very precise strategy, aimed at liquidating my trial with a condemnation that has already been decided by Bergoglio and his zealous collaborator Tucho Fernández, author of the scandalous pornographic pamphlet La Pasion mistica: Espiritualidad y Sensualidad, as well as Saname con tu boca: El arte de besar. 

O’Connell writes: 

The decree says that it considered ‘superfluous’ the prior investigation in accordance with Canon 1717 that states, ‘Whenever an ordinary has knowledge, which at least seems true, of a delict, he is carefully to inquire personally or through another suitable person about the facts, circumstances, and imputability, unless such an inquiry seems entirely superfluous.’ This means that the evidence against him had already been collected by the dicastery and did not require fuller investigation. Much of it was already in the public domain.

As can be seen, “evidence” is considered superfluous, and the procedure is deliberately simplified in order to reach a conviction as soon as possible: 

America has learned that the decision to proceed with the extrajudicial penal trial would have been approved by the pope, since the accused is a bishop.

And that’s not all: the Jesuits of America are already giving indications about my procedural destiny: 

The extrajudicial penal trial is in accordance with Canon 1364 of the Code of Canon Law, which states: ‘An apostate from the faith, a heretic or a schismatic incurs a latæ sententiæ excommunication, without prejudice to the provision of can. 194’ and that ‘he or she may also be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§ 2-4.’ This means, among other things, that the excommunication would be declared publicly, and it would remain in force until the convicted person repents. That same Canon 1364 also states: ‘If a long-standing contempt or the gravity of scandal calls for it, other penalties may be added, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state.’

The juridical competence of America magazine, however, seems to have no place in the Vatican, where it has now become common to use extrajudicial trials and the direct interventions of the Argentine both to cover up the real culprits and to hastily condemn the innocent. Beyond the media hype, the former Cardinal McCarrick – who in a serious trial would have been made to compensate the victims of his crimes after the examination of testimonies that could have clarified many connivances – continued to work for Bergoglio in the United States and China, where the secret Sino-Vatican Agreement saw him directly involved. Marko Rupnik, S.J., thanks to the intervention of his protector, had his excommunication lifted. He was not even dismissed from the clerical state; on the contrary, he was welcomed and incardinated in a diocese in Slovenia. Evidently, criticizing the Council is considered a far more serious crime than those of McCarrick and Rupnik.

I therefore wish to make it clear that I did not go to the Vatican yesterday [June 20], and that I have no intention of going to the Holy Office on June 28, and that I have not delivered any statement or document in my defense to the Dicastery, whose authority I do not recognize, nor do I recognize the authority of its Prefect, nor do I recognize the authority of the one who appointed him. 

I have no intention of submitting myself to a show trial in which those who are supposed to judge me impartially in order to defend Catholic orthodoxy are at the same time those whom I accuse of heresy, treason, and abuse of power. And among them are precisely the Jesuits, the first proponents of all the moral and doctrinal deviations of the last sixty years, starting with James Martin, S.J., the LGBTQ+ activist who is a regular visitor at Santa Marta. 

America says: 

A canon lawyer (who wished to remain anonymous) who has read the archbishop’s defense statement, told America: ‘This is the major argument for the prosecution. His defense is a declaration of schism. It is the most egregious act of schism.’ He explained that the extrajudicial procedure envisaged usually does not take much time. If the archbishop is convicted, the pope would then have to confirm the penalties.

This anonymous “canon lawyer” considers my statement as a proof of my schismatic will: but the whole question concerns which is the “church” to which Bergoglio belongs and the de facto schism from the true Church that he has already accomplished over and over again with his declarations, with his acts of government, and with his most eloquent behavior of open hostility to all that is Catholic. Bergoglio’s “church” is not the Catholic Church, but rather that “conciliar church” born from Vatican Council II and recently rebranded with the no less heretical name of “synodal church.” If it is from this “church” that I am declared to be separated by schism, it will be for me a cause for honor and pride."

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

June 21, 202

End of article...

Pray for Archbishop Vigano and for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 

Breaking! This Is Huge! Is Archbishop Vigano To Be Ex-Communicated By Apostate Rome Authorities???

  I guess most folks -- who haven't been living in a cave -- knew this was coming...

It has been revealed that the good Archbishop Vigano has been summoned to Rome to face the spiritual guillotine of ex-communication!

Here are two articles both from lifesitenews.com and, one, written by LifeSiteNews staff, and the other by Archbishop Vigano himself to refute the nonsensical accusations lodged against Ab. Vigano...

BREAKING: Vatican charges Archbishop Viganò with schism for 'denial of the legitimacy of Pope Francis' - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

And...

Archbishop Viganò responds to schism charge: ‘I regard the accusations against me as an honor' - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

Well, as I said, this was bound to happen, as the anti-Christ regime in the Vatican had to do "something" to discredit and make an example of those who defy their diabolical, anti-Catholic power and squash anyone who dares to point out and fight the errors, heresies, scandals and confusion emanating from Rome, under the leader of the pack, Bergoglio.

Here is the first article: "The Vatican's doctrinal office summoned Archbishop Viganò to appear before an 'extrajudicial penal trial' on June 20 over accusations of 'schism' owing to a 'denial of the legitimacy of Pope Francis, rupture of communion with Him, and rejection of the Second Vatican Council.'

(LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) has instigated an “extrajudicial penal trial” against Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, accusing the prelate of “the crime of schism.”

In an email signed by Monsignor John Kennedy of the dicastery’s Disciplinary Section and sent to the Italian archbishop, who served as papal nuncio to the United States from 2011 to 2016, the dicastery summoned Viganò to the Vatican on June 20 that he “may take notice of the accusations and evidence concerning the crime of schism.” Namely, the dicastery notified the archbishop that he stands accused of making “public statements which result in a denial of the elements necessary to maintain communion with the Catholic Church; denial of the legitimacy of Pope Francis, rupture of communion with Him, and rejection of the Second Vatican Council.”

In response, Viganò defended himself stating, “as a successor of the apostles, to be in full communion with the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, with the Magisterium of the Roman Pontiffs, and with the uninterrupted doctrinal, moral, and liturgical Tradition which they have faithfully preserved.”

Regarding the accusations against him “as an honor,” Viganò stressed his desire to “repudiate, reject, and condemn the scandals, errors, and heresies of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who manifests an absolutely tyrannical management of power, exercised against the purpose that legitimizes authority in the Church: an authority that is vicarious of that of Christ, and as such must obey Him alone.”

After arguing that “[no] Catholic worthy of the name can be in communion with this ‘Bergoglian church,’ because it acts in clear discontinuity and rupture with all the popes of history and with the Church of Christ,” Viganò asked Catholics to “pray that the Lord will come to the aid of His Church and give courage to those who are persecuted for their Faith.”

This story is developing…

End of first article...

Now, the response from Archbishop Vigano...

'I am honored not to have – and indeed I do not want – any ecclesial communion' with Pope Francis, Archbishop Viganò wrote, adding his repudiation of 'the neo-modernist errors inherent in the Second Vatican Council.'

Editor’s note: The following is an announcement from Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò regarding the start of his extrajudicial criminal trial for schism.

(LifeSiteNews) — The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith has informed me, with a simple email, of the initiation of an extrajudicial penal trial against me, with the accusation of having committed the crime of schism and charging me of having denied the legitimacy of “Pope Francis,” of having broken communion “with Him,” and of having rejected the Second Vatican Council.

I have been summoned to the Palace of the Holy Office on June 20, in person or represented by a canon lawyer. I assume that the sentence has already been prepared, given that it is an extrajudicial process.

READ: Vatican charges Archbishop Viganò with schism for ‘denial of the legitimacy of Pope Francis’

I regard the accusations against me as an honor. I believe that the very wording of the charges confirms the theses that I have repeatedly defended in my various addresses. It is no coincidence that the accusation against me concerns the questioning of the legitimacy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and the rejection of Vatican II: the council represents the ideological, theological, moral, and liturgical cancer of which the Bergoglian “synodal church” is the necessary metastasis.

It is necessary for the episcopate, the clergy, and the people of God to seriously ask themselves whether it is consistent with the profession of the Catholic faith to passively witness the systematic destruction of the Church by its leaders, just as other subversives are destroying civil society. Globalism calls for ethnic substitution: Bergoglio promotes uncontrolled immigration and calls for the integration of cultures and religions. Globalism supports LGBT ideology: Bergoglio authorizes the blessing of same-sex couples and imposes on the faithful the acceptance of homosexualism, while covering up the scandals of his protégés and promoting them to the highest positions of responsibility. Globalism imposes the green agenda: Bergoglio worships the idol of the Pachamama, writes delirious encyclicals about the environment, supports the Agenda 2030, and attacks those who question the theory of man-made global warming.

He goes beyond his role in matters that strictly pertain to science, but always and only in one direction: a direction that is diametrically opposed to what the Church has always taught. He has mandated the use of experimental gene serums, which caused very serious damage, death and sterility, calling them “an act of love,” in exchange for funding from pharmaceutical companies and philanthropic foundations. His total alignment with the “Davos religion” is scandalous. Wherever governments at the service of the World Economic Forum have introduced or extended abortion, promoted vice, legitimized homosexual unions or gender transition, encouraged euthanasia, and tolerated the persecution of Catholics, not a word has been spent in defense of the faith or morals that are threatened, or in support of the civil battles of so many Catholics who have been abandoned by the Vatican and the bishops. Not a word for the persecuted Catholics in China, with the complicity of the Holy See, which considers Beijing’s billions more important than the lives and freedom of thousands of Chinese who are faithful to the Roman Church.

In the “synodal church” presided over by Bergoglio, no schism is recognized among the German episcopate, or among the government-appointed bishops who have been consecrated in China without the mandate of Rome. Because their action is consistent with the destruction of the Church, and therefore must be concealed, minimized, tolerated, and finally encouraged.

In these 11 years of “pontificate” the Catholic Church has been humiliated and discredited above all because of the scandals and corruption of the leaders of the hierarchy, which have been totally ignored even as the most ruthless Vatican authoritarianism raged against faithful priests and religious, small communities of traditional nuns, and communities tied to the Latin Mass.

READ: Pope Francis faces UN probe over alleged wiretapping as Bishop Strickland joins exorcism prayer for world

This one-sided zeal is reminiscent of Cromwell’s fanaticism, typical of those who defy providence in the presumption of knowing that they are finally at the top of the hierarchical pyramid, free to do and undo as they please without anyone objecting to anything. And this work of destruction, this willingness to renounce the salvation of souls in the name of a human peace that denies God is not an invention of Bergoglio, but the main (and unmentionable) purpose of those who used a council to contradict the Catholic Magisterium and to begin to demolish the Church from within, in small steps, but always in a single direction, always with the indulgent tolerance or culpable inaction – if not the explicit approval – of the Roman authorities.

The Catholic Church has been slowly but surely taken over, and Bergoglio has been given the task of making it a philanthropic agency, the “church of humanity, of inclusion, of the environment” at the service of the New World Order. But this is not the Catholic Church: it is her counterfeit.

The resignation of Benedict XVI and the appointment by the St. Gallen Mafia of a successor in line with the diktats of the Agenda 2030 was intended to allow – and has succeeded in allowing – the global coup to take place with the complicity and authoritative support of the Church of Rome. Bergoglio is to the Church what other world leaders are to their nations: traitors, subversives, and final liquidators of traditional society who are certain of impunity. Bergoglio’s defect of consent (vitium consensus) in accepting his election is based precisely on the evident alienity of his action of government and magisterium with respect to what any Catholic of any age expects from the Vicar of Christ and the Successor of the Prince of the Apostles. Everything that Bergoglio does constitutes an offense and a provocation to the entire Catholic Church, to her saints of all times, to the martyrs who were killed in odium Fidei, and to the popes of all times until the Second Vatican Council.

This is also and principally an offense against the Divine Head of the Church, Our Lord Jesus Christ, whose sacred authority Bergoglio claims to exercise for the detriment of the mystical body, with an action that is too systematic and coherent to appear to be the fruit of mere incapacity. In the work of Bergoglio and his circle, the Lord’s warning is put into practice: “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the guise of lambs, but who are ravenous wolves at heart” (Mt 7:15).

I am honored not to have – and indeed I do not want – any ecclesial communion with them: theirs is a lobby, which conceals its complicity with the masters of the world in order to deceive many souls and prevent any resistance against the establishment of the Kingdom of the Antichrist.

In the face of the dicastery’s accusations, I claim, as successor of the apostles, to be in full communion with the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, with the Magisterium of the Roman pontiffs, and with the uninterrupted doctrinal, moral, and liturgical tradition which they have faithfully preserved.

I repudiate the neo-modernist errors inherent in the Second Vatican Council and in the so-called “post-conciliar magisterium,” in particular in matters of collegiality, ecumenism, religious freedom, the secularity of the state, and the liturgy.

I repudiate, reject, and condemn the scandals, errors, and heresies of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who manifests an absolutely tyrannical management of power, exercised against the purpose that legitimizes authority in the Church: an authority that is vicarious of that of Christ, and as such must obey Him alone. This separation of the papacy from its legitimizing principle, which is Christ the High Priest, transforms the ministerium into a self-referential tyranny.

No Catholic worthy of the name can be in communion with this “Bergoglian church,” because it acts in clear discontinuity and rupture with all the popes of history and with the Church of Christ.

WATCH: Cardinal Sarah warns against ‘practical atheism’

Fifty years ago, in that same Palace of the Holy Office, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was summoned and accused of schism for rejecting Vatican II. His defense is mine; his words are mine; and his arguments are mine – arguments before which the Roman authorities could not condemn him for heresy, having to wait instead for him to consecrate bishops so as to have the pretext of declaring him schismatic and then revoking his excommunication when he was already dead. The scheme is repeated even after half a century has demonstrated Archbishop Lefebvre’s prophetic choice.

In these times of apostasy, Catholics will find in pastors faithful to the mandate received from Our Lord an example and an encouragement to abide in the truth of Christ.

Depositum custodi, according to the apostle’s exhortation: as the time approaches when I will have to give an account to the Son of God of all my actions, I intend to persevere in the bonum certamen and not to fail in the witness of faith which is required of each one who, as bishop, has been endowed with the fullness of the priesthood and constituted successor of the apostles.

I invite all Catholics to pray that the Lord will come to the aid of His Church and give courage to those who are persecuted for their faith.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop"

End of article...

It is apparent that Archbishop Vigano is now undergoing a "white martyrdom"... Please pray for him!!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!!

Gene DeLalla