Friday, March 27, 2026

Another Massive Scandal From Leo: Leo Honors New Female Pro-Abortion ‘Archbishop’ Of Canterbury!!

 WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!

THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE MAY BE VERY HARD TO TAKE FOR SOME...

SO, BEWARE!!

Ladies and gentlemen, we must, I say must, get past the diabolical "smiles" of this man enthroned in the Chair of St. Peter!

If what Leo says in this article doesn't make you damn mad, then something is very wrong -- with you!

The scandalous and horrendous praise that Prevost lavishes on this make-believe "archbishop" is nothing short of an attack on the Catholic Faith itself!

In addition, to invoke the Mother of God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, regarding the phony "archbishop" of Canterbury, the female, Sarah Mullally, and your blood doesn't boil, then you are part of the problem!

 We, as practicing Catholics, must take the gloves off, and face the evil that is emanating from apostate Rome!

From lifesitenews.com, and written by John-Henry Westen Thu Mar 26, 2026 - 2:43 pm EDT: Pope Leo honors new female pro-abortion ‘archbishop’ of Canterbury - LifeSite

"VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Pope Leo XIV has issued a congratulatory letter to Sarah Mullally – the first woman ever appointed “archbishop of Canterbury” and a vocal supporter of abortion and the LGBT agenda. In the letter, Leo praises Mullally’s “weighty” responsibilities, and explicitly invokes the Blessed Virgin Mary as a source of “inspiration” for her new role.

The March 20, 2026 message, published on the Vatican website, was released after Mullally’s installation yesterday. It makes no reference whatsoever to the Catholic Church’s perennial teaching that Anglican orders are “absolutely null and utterly void” (Apostolicae Curae, 1896), that the ordination of women is impossible and contrary to the will of Christ, or to Mullally’s own public record promoting grave moral evils of abortion and homosexual acts.

Instead, Leo XIV opens with the salutation:

“To The Most Reverend and Right Honourable Dame Sarah Mullally Archbishop of Canterbury”

He continues:

“I know that the office for which you have been chosen is a weighty one, with responsibilities not only in the Diocese of Canterbury, but throughout the Church of England as well as the Anglican Communion as a whole… In asking the Lord to strengthen you with the gift of wisdom, I pray that you may be guided by the Holy Spirit in serving your communities, and draw inspiration from the example of Mary, the Mother of God.”

This invocation of the Blessed Virgin Mary – the Theotokos, the model of perfect obedience to God’s Will – is particularly scandalous. To hold up the Mother of God as inspiration for a woman pretending to exercise a priestly and episcopal office that the Church has always declared Christ reserved to men – not to mention for a leader who actively promotes abortion and same-sex “marriage” – is a mind-bending scandal.

Leo XIV quotes Pope Francis saying “it would be a scandal if, due to our divisions, we did not fulfil our common vocation to make Christ known.”

He adds:

Dear sister, I willingly make these words my own, for it is through the witness of a reconciled, fraternal and united Christian community that the proclamation of the Gospel will resound most clearly.

With these fraternal sentiments, I invoke upon you the blessings of Almighty God as you take up your high responsibilities. May the Holy Spirit come down upon you and make you fruitful in the Lord’s service.

I’m sorry, my friends, that we need to keep banging this drum. But since most of the cardinals and bishops see Leo XIV as doing good for the Church, we must speak, we must point out the staggering damage he is causing to the One True Faith.

First off, Sarah Mullally, whom Leo here salutes, is explicitly pro-abortion and pro-LGBT. In a 2012 blog post, she declared herself “pro choice rather than pro life,” explaining: “I would suspect that I would describe my approach to this issue as pro choice rather than pro live [sic] although if it were a continuum I would be somewhere along it moving towards pro life when it relates to my choice and then enabling choice when it related to others.”

As “bishop” of London in 2022, she actively promoted “LGBT+ History Month” and launched a diocesan advisory group focused on “the pastoral care and inclusion of LGBT+ people in the life of our church communities.” Multiple LifeSite reports have shown her to be a “strong supporter of same-sex marriage,” a stance that has triggered massive controversy in the Church of England: conservative Global South Anglicans (representing tens of millions) have broken communion with Canterbury, and the Primate of Nigeria denounced her appointment as “devastating” and a rejection of biblical teaching.

Secondly, the Church has affirmed over and over again that women cannot be priests and that the Anglican orders are “absolutely null and utterly void.” So to pretend that this is somehow a blessed vocation and praise Mullally in it and invoke God’s blessing and the inspiration of the Blessed Virgin Mary on it is unspeakably evil. It massively confuses the faithful and goes right along with Leo’s own intervention a few months ago where he scandalously said to the Anglicans and other non-Catholic Christian leaders that “we are already one.”

The full text of the Leo’s message is available on the Vatican website.

Pray for the conversion of Leo XIV, that he may govern the Church with fidelity and stop presenting another gospel where all sects are one and which downplays the most serious violations of the moral law.

And let us pray the Rosary, the weapon given to us by Our Lady herself, for the restoration of full Catholic truth – in other words, the Triumph of Her Immaculate Heart."

Featured Image

John-Henry is the co-founder and CEO of LifeSiteNews.com. He and his wife Dianne have eight children and they live in the Ottawa Valley in Ontario, Canada.

He has spoken at conferences and retreats, and appeared on radio and television throughout the world. John-Henry founded the Rome Life Forum, an annual strategy meeting for life, faith and family leaders worldwide. He is a board member of the John Paul II Academy for Human Life and the Family. He is a consultant to Canada’s largest pro-life organization Campaign Life Coalition, and serves on the executive of the Ontario branch of the organization. He has run three times for political office in the province of Ontario representing the Family Coalition Party.

John-Henry earned an MA from the University of Toronto in School and Child Clinical Psychology and an Honours BA from York University in Psychology.

End of article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun, and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph, pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla










- No comments:

Catholic Priest Defends Carrie Prejean Boller Amid Attacks By Bishop Barron And Cardinal Dolan

 Finally, a Catholic priest with guts!

Why should he be the only Catholic priest, bishop, cardinal or pope, to come forward and defend the convert, Boller?

Why the silence in the face of an unjust expulsion from the RLC?

Remember, it was "Bishop" Barron that couldn't defend the Biblical teaching -- and the very words of Our Lord! -- that no one comes to the Father, except by Me!  No, Christ, Barron said, is "only the privileged way"!

In fact, it took a Protestant minister to tell the Jew, Shapiro, the Biblical facts of life, so to speak, while Barron failed miserably in his charism as a "bishop"!

And "cardinal" Dolan?  

Well, if you remember his response to the revelation by an interviewer about a sports figure announcing that he was/is a homosexual...

The response from the so-called cardinal: "Bravo"!

Yes, "Bravo"!  Instead of calling the sodomite back to earth and the Natural Law, let that potential teaching minute go to waste, further condemning the player to eternal perdition if he didn't repent!

Truly the most un-Catholic, and uncharitable stance! 

Let's face it, Dolan's response did nothing but encourage and support that heinous life-choice -- the sin of Sodom -- to go uncorrected!

What a price to pay at his Particular Judgment if he doesn't repent!  

And these are the two characters that verbally attacked Mrs. Boller?

That says it all...

One more thing... I wonder what will happen to this courageous priest -- being from New Jersey and under the "authority" of the heretic (and radical sodomite supporter,) "cardinal" Tobin! 

From lifesitenews.com, and written by Myles Allman Wed Mar 25, 2026 - 9:06 am EDT: Priest defends Carrie Prejean Boller amid clash with Bishop Barron and Cardinal Dolan - LifeSite

"(LifeSiteNews) — A young priest from New Jersey has come to the defense of Carrie Prejean Boller amid her removal from President Donald Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission, stating that, despite descriptions to the contrary by two prominent prelates, her deportment on the commission was “fitting” and “important” for ensuring religious freedom for Catholics and others.

Father Joseph S. DeMarzo III issued his Monday analysis on social media platform X, disagreeing with Bishop Robert Barron’s assessment that Boller was removed from the commission for “browbeating witnesses, aggressively asserting her point of view, hijacking the meeting for her own political purposes.”

“I must disagree with this statement,” explained the young priest who was ordained for the Diocese of Patterson, New Jersey, last June.

Given the purpose of the hearing was “to speak out against discrimination and injustice,” Boller’s exchanges were “fitting” since she was defending the religious liberty rights of all, he explained.

“She asked whether one could reject antisemitism and at the same time condemn the mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza, reject political Zionism, or not support the political state of Israel,” addressing Jewish Zionist witnesses on the panel.

In doing so, “Carrie was fulfilling her duty as a member of the board in speaking not only for the protection of Jews, but also for Palestinians,” DeMarzo wrote. “It is also a fair question to ask in light of the thousands of Palestinians who have been killed since October 7. As Catholics, we decry the killing of all innocent human life.”

READ: ‘Faith in a Time of Genocide’: Holy Land Christians call for solidarity, repudiation of Zionism

Furthermore, the young priest argued that Boller’s questioning was also in service to peace and a “caution” against the crime of disproportionate violence in response to offense.

“Her comment and question were also fitting in helping the committee address the evil of antisemitism,” DeMarzo explained. Her line of questioning “can be interpreted as a caution that, in light of evil antisemitic actions, one must not resort to uncontrolled violence against Palestinians in Gaza.”

“There is a fire that was lit, and she was simply pointing out that another fire has been lit, and one cannot put out fire with fire. She wished to hold all persons accountable for violence against innocent human life,” he emphasized.

READ: Gaza releases names of 15,000+ children killed by Israel since October 2023

Additionally, the priest confirmed the importance of defining the term “antisemitism” in a way conforming with reason and the objective moral law. And thus, “as a defender of all faiths,” Boller naturally also defended her own, and did so “courageously in noting that Catholics are in fact not Zionists, and that this should not be remotely part of the definition of antisemitism.”

“The reason this is important is that if rejection of Zionism is equated with antisemitism, it opens the door to the persecution of Catholics, or of people in general,” DeMarzo said. “Since this language is part of the current political context when speaking about Israel’s actions, it is just that Catholics, having their own religious liberty under the First Amendment, be able to disagree with religiously or politically motivated actions which do not reflect what it means to be Catholic.”

The real danger with a false definition of the term, which goes beyond the parameters of the moral law, is that Catholics can be deemed “antisemitic” simply due to their upholding the integrity of their apostolic faith, “which would itself be a form of religious persecution,” DeMarzo said. “The committee cannot serve the purpose of defending religious liberty by denying it to another group, namely Catholics.”

READ: How Israel used atrocity propaganda to justify the destruction of Gaza

Reposting DeMarzo’s comments on Monday, Boller expressed her gratitude to the young priest, stating, “At a moment when it would be easier for so many to stay silent, you chose to speak the truth publicly. That alone is a gift, and I am so deeply grateful.”

She went on to classify his statements as “a witness to the Gospel and to the dignity of every human life.”

DeMarzo’s analysis comes in the wake of a sharp public exchange between Boller and fellow Religious Liberty Commission member, Bp. Barron, over the reasons behind her removal from the commission following its February meeting. At that time, she challenged the notion that “anti-Zionism is antisemitism” while defending the right of Americans to protest what many judge to be Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people without being branded “antisemitic.”

She also accurately articulated Catholic doctrine regarding the present modern state of Israel as having no theological, biblical, or prophetical relevance.

READ: Carrie Prejean Boller stands firm as Bishop Barron accuses her of ‘hijacking’ hearing

Following her public challenge to the very well-known Barron to defend the rights of Catholics to maintain authentic doctrine, the latter responded charging that Boller falsely portrayed herself as a victim of anti-Catholic prejudice and that her assertion of her religious liberty being denied was “simply preposterous.”

In response to Barron’s statement, Boller alleged she had originally been asked to resign from the commission last August, casting doubt on Barron’s notion that she was only forced out over her “behavior” at February’s hearing.

“I was asked to resign in August for the same reasons I was removed in February. You knew about this because you called me immediately after I sent you this email, and you were in shock. Do you really want to stick with this story, Your Excellency?” she asked Barron at the time.

In a Tuesday morning post on X, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, who also serves on the commission – though, like Barron, did not attend the February meeting – stated he agreed “wholeheartedly” with Barron’s assessment of Boller’s removal.

In response, Catholic author and podcaster Taylor Marshall pointed out how “Cardinal Dolan AND Bishop Barron have endorsed and written book blurbs for Fr James Martin, S.J.,” who is known for his notorious pro-LGBT advocacy.

“Yet both bishops openly rebuke and dogpile onto a Catholic laywoman through a public forum like Twitter [X],” he wrote. “This is effeminate behavior in both cases. Shame on them.”

 RELATED

Carrie Prejean Boller thanks Pope Leo for condemning Middle East war amid ‘moral silence’

Israeli extremist rabbis instruct soldiers heading to Gaza: ‘Kill all their children’

‘Pro-life’ GOP starving 1 million children to death in Gaza, USCCB remains silent

Catholic woman ousted from Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission after denouncing Zionism

Catholic ousted from Religious Liberty Commission speaks out on death threats

Catholic hero REMOVED from Trump’s commission for denouncing Zionism

End of article...

(Here is another revelation of what these heresiarchs really believe: 🚨 Both Cardinal Dolan AND Bishop Barron have endorsed and written book blurbs for Fr James Martin, S.J. 🏳️‍🌈)

That's right "Fr." James Martin, the heretic and radical supporter of the sodomites, and Barron and Dolan show support for his apostasy?   

Pray for the defeat of these modernist monsters -- and for their conversion back to the Catholic Faith!

Pray too for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun, and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph, pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla


 

- No comments:

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Homeschool In Connecticut? Watch Out! Democrat Bill Could Dismantle Homeschooling Freedom In Connecticut!!

 The anti-Natural Law, Demonrat Party of death, is at it again in Connecticut!

From lifesitenews.com, and written by Matt Lamb Tue Mar 24, 2026 - 10:26 am EDT: comes this disturbing news...Democrat bill could dismantle homeschooling freedom in Connecticut - LifeSite

Comment: You folks that homeschool in Connecticut, watch out!  Those wicked and evil house and senate Dems want to send the Department of Children and Families directly into your homes before you can homeschool!!  

(Remember, your two federal senators are Richard "Da Nang Dick" (stolen valor) Blumenthal and Christoper Murphy.  Both are radical pre-born baby killers and disgusting supporters of the mutilation of bodies -- and souls! -- in their quest to make sure that the LGBTQ lunatics have the same "rights" as normal, God-fearing humans! 

Their sick support of the bizarre and deadly "rights" are part and parcel of the culture of death in the communist state of Connecticut!)

Now the article...

"(LifeSiteNews) — Pending legislation in Connecticut would allow state officials to heavily scrutinize homeschooling parents, according to a legal expert.

Last week, the Connecticut Education Committee voted 26-20 to advance controversial legislation that would impose greater burdens on homeschooling moms and dads. Though titled innocently as a bill about “equivalent instruction,” advocates warn the consequences would be far more dire.

The proposed legislation would also mandate a curriculum review, which undermines one of the benefits of homeschooling, which is flexibility in what parents teach their kids.

Local school district officials, who presumably would want more kids in the schools to increase funding, would be granted enormous powers as well.

The law would order parents to visit the local school district every year and fill out forms in order to homeschool their kids.

However, the school district would not simply process paperwork but would be empowered to withhold permission until the Department of Children and Families confirmed there were no active child abuse investigations.

Advocates for the increased regulation cite several horrific examples of children who were removed from public schools under the guise of homeschooling when indeed the purpose was to hide abuse.

A Democratic legislative leader did not respond to a request for comment on the legislation.

LifeSiteNews contacted Democratic Representative Jennifer Leeper, who chairs the Education Committee, and asked for more details on the required “equivalent instruction.” LifeSiteNews also emailed Leeper questions about any steps she had taken to address concerns by opponents of the bill. Neither she, nor listed media representative Jackson Delaney, responded to questions on Monday morning.

Bill would take Connecticut from being one of the best to the worst

Currently Connecticut “is the one of the least regulated states in the nation” and has no “curriculum mandates” or “portfolio reviews,” according to attorney Ralph Rodriguez.

This freedom to teach kids at home would turn “that model on its head,” Rodriguez told LifeSiteNews on a phone interview. The bill would still not explicitly contain curriculum mandates, he said.

The Homeschool Legal Defense Association attorney said the proposed notification requirement to child services is the “most problematic” part of the law.

Though he shares concerns about detecting abuse, Rodriguez said the creation of lists of homeschooling parents without clear mechanisms to protect data is the wrong solution.

Under the law, the Department of Children and Families would receive a “notification” whenever parents asked to homeschool. They would then have to sign off on the request by checking there are no open abuse cases.

“So, in our estimation it’s basically asking permission from the government to exercise a fundamental right, and you’re involving an agency that historically has nothing to do with education,” Rodriguez said.

LifeSiteNews asked him to elaborate further on the argument that this law is needed to catch abuse.

“There’s no nothing written in the bill as to what happens with any list that are made for these seemingly thousands of families that will be put on notice to the [Department of Children and Families],” Rodriguez told LifeSiteNews.

In fact, advocates for increased government oversight into homeschooling killed an amendment on a related bill that would have “eradicated” the lists from a government database.

He said it is not clear how large the homeschooling community is in Connecticut, but said estimates have put it around 28,000 to 35,000 kids.

The homeschooling legal group “is very serious about making sure child abuse is rooted out, but we believe there are more effective ways, namely the state being able to reform and better situate its child welfare system,” Rodriguez said.

Connecticut law latest attack on educational rights

This proposed law is not the only one pushed by blue-state legislators that would crack down on the rights of parents to educate their children.

Last year, leftists in Illinois tried to crack down on homeschooling in the state. The law followed a model created by the “Coalition for Responsible Home Education.” That group receives money from the left-wing Ben and Jerry’s Foundation and is explicitly anti-Christian.

“Christian fundamentalists in the United States have worked to enact their regressive ideas about gender and race by using homeschooling to isolate and abuse their own children,” the group claimed.

However, the bill failed after opposition from black Chicago Democrats who warned about government intrusion.

House Bill 2827 would massively expand the power of public school officials to oversee homeschoolers within their district. Critics warn the legislation could lead to mandated vaccinations as well as other heavy-handed state involvement. Public backlash against the bill has dwarfed supporters of it – about 42,000 people have filed witness slips opposing the bill, while only 1,000 have filed public support for it.

Democratic state Representative La Shawn Ford argued against the bill during a rally, using liberal language about policing and criminal justice to criticize the legislation.

“Right now, I don’t believe the bill is what’s needed in Illinois,” Ford said. “I believe in restorative justice and I believe in making sure that people don’t have a pathway to the criminal justice system.”

He said the law created a “pipeline to the criminal justice system for parents.”

“How can we criminalize parents for wanting to love their children?”'

End of article...

Pray for the defeat of these modernist monsters -- and for their conversion!!

Pray too for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun, and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph, pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla





















- No comments:

Sunday, March 22, 2026

Treasonous Rat, Apostate, Biden's Corrupt CIA: In A Leaked Memo, Traditional Family Values Were Seen As Sign Of White ‘Extremism’!!

 Remember, Biden, the "Catholic in good standing," (according to the now-dead Bergoglio) hated traditional Catholics, especially those who attended the Latin Mass as well as Tradition itself, had the corrupt FBI and the even more corrupt, CIA, spy on -- you and me!

That is not hyperbole! 

The revealed evidence is overwhelming! 

Now, from lifesitenews.com, and written by Doug Mainwaring Sat Mar 21, 2026 - 2:29 pm EDT: Biden CIA saw traditional family values as sign of white 'extremism': leaked memo - LifeSite, comes even more proof of the traitors at the rogue, anti-American, CIA!

"(LifeSiteNews) — The CIA under the direction of the Biden administration shocked the world when a leaked document showed the intelligence agency had branded Latin Mass Catholics as likely “violent extremists.” 

Now another equally shocking CIA internal memo has been unearthed by the Trump administration which shows that under Biden, the CIA had warned that “traditional motherhood” and “homemaking” are signs of white extremism.

 America First Legal (AFL), which published on X a lengthy thread concerning the disturbing CIA memo, said, “The intelligence assessment reveals the top-to-bottom bias at Biden’s CIA.”

“An agency with critical intelligence responsibilities was spending its resources targeting women promoting motherhood,” noted AFL.

The assessment focuses on those that “believe that their perception of an idealized white European ethnic identity is under attack from people who embody and support multiculturalism and globalization.”

Titled, “Women Advancing White Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist Radicalization and Recruitment,” the 11-page 2021 document starts, “We assess that female members have been emerging as key players of the transnational white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremist (REMVE) movement, taking on diverse roles to advance white REMVE goals—including the white REMVE view of traditional motherhood—and successfully participating in newer roles in propaganda and recruitment.”

“White RMVEs and their sympathizers have claimed in online posts that it is essential for white families to have as many biological children as possible to counter the rising birthrates among non-white populations; white REMVEs allege that this rise is a conspiracy, which they have termed the ‘great replacement,’ according to an Open Source Enterprise assessment,” the memo asserts. 

By page 2 of the document, the CIA frets that REMVEs have “lauded motherhood and homemaking as women’s most important responsibility.”

The Trump administration has retracted the Biden-era CIA document.

“U.S. intelligence agencies exist to protect Americans — not target them,” noted AFL on X.

“This is what happens when woke ideology replaces actual threat-based intelligence collection and analysis,” Gene Hamilton, president of America First Legal, told The Daily Signal.

“The Biden administration was obsessed with deconstructing our country,” said Hamilton. “Motherhood was suspect. Homemaking was suspect. Everyday Americans were suspect. Under the Biden administration, mainstream American life was turned into a threat profile. We should never forget how deep the rot went.”

“I’m … not a target, right? RIGHT?” wrote Legal Insurrection’s Mary Chastain in a tongue-in-cheek commentary.

“I’m a traditionalist. I honestly believe that a woman should stay home once she has children. And yes, you should have children. Children are wonderful and a blessing,” she explained.

“Yeah, I’d believe that if Biden’s administration didn’t demonize parents who tried to hold school boards accountable or spy on Catholics who hold traditions and prefer the Latin Mass,” said Chastain."'

End of very revealing article...

Pray for the defeat of these modernist monsters, and for their conversion!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun, and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph, pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla










- No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Another Massive Scandal From Leo: Leo Honors New Female Pro-Abortion ‘Archbishop’ Of Canterbury!!

 WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING! THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE MAY BE VERY HARD TO TAKE FOR SOME... SO, BEWARE!! Ladies and gentlemen, we must, I say m...