From The Left-Wing Rag, Politico: Pope Leo Will ‘Stand With’ Catholic Leaders In Protecting Immigrants’ Rights, Advocates Say

 As each day passes, it seems that the new pope Leo is inserting himself deeper and deeper into American affairs, especially when it comes to the 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 illegal aliens that invaded our country under the treasonous apostate, Biden, and his Marxist cronies.

We all know that Bergoglio -- and now Leo -- despise President Trump simply because he is attempting to enforce federal laws on the books and protect the sovereignty of our nation!

We also know that there are tens of millions of taxpayer dollars -- no, make that billions of taxpayer dollars -- being misused by the various "charities," especially "Catholic Charities," and the numerous NGOs syphoning those monies and funneling them to extremist, left-wing organizations as well as those entities that support the heinous crime of abortion, drug, and,  yes, even human trafficking throughout the U.S.

We also know that many of the ultra-liberal bishops in the U.S. are in lockstep with the Democrat Party -- the party of death and mayhem -- and, in many cases, are traitors to their own country -- and most importantly to Christ Our Lord!

Here is an article from the left-wing rag, Politico, written by Faith Wardwel: Pope Leo will ‘stand with’ Catholic leaders in protecting immigrants’ rights, advocates say

"Pope Leo XIV said he will stand with Catholic leaders in protecting immigrants facing mass deportations in the U.S., according to a group of American Catholic leaders and advocacy groups he met with at the Vatican on Wednesday.

A delegation including El Paso Bishop Mark Seitz and members of the Hope Border Institute, an advocacy group partnered with the El Paso archdiocese, presented the pope with hundreds of letters and a four-minute video from immigrants detailing their experiences as the Trump administration’s deportation campaign continues to expel thousands from the U.S.

“He watched the whole thing, and his eyes at the end were filled with tears as he watched it,” Dylan Corbett, the founding executive director of the group, who was present at the meeting, told POLITICO. “As the meeting came to an end he said, ‘You stand with me and I stand with you, and the church will continue to accompany and stand with migrants.’”

Corbett said the pope urged Catholic bishops in the U.S. to be “more united and more forceful” on the issue of protecting migrants’ rights in the U.S.

“I was kind of surprised, because he didn’t really need an introduction to the topic,” Corbett said of the meeting. “He seemed to be very well-briefed and informed and concerned.”

Seitz, the El Paso bishop, similarly told the AP that Leo thanked “us for our commitment to the immigrant peoples and also saying that he hopes that the bishops’ conference will speak to this issue.”

Catholic leaders in the U.S. have condemned the Trump administration’s sweeping immigration effort, which has deported more than 2 million from the country. Administration officials defend the move as an investment in public safety and security, though immigrants and advocates say the deportations have separated many from their families and ignited fear in migrant communities.

In the first months of his papacy, Pope Leo has continued to mirror Pope Francis’ strong rebukes of the mass deportations. His predecessor said Trump’s deportation program would place immigrants in “a state of particular vulnerability and defenselessness,” warning the administration it would “end badly.”

The pope’s comments in the Wednesday meeting are the most recent push from Pope Leo against the U.S.’s immigration crackdown. He questioned last week whether those who support “inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States” qualified as “pro life.” The White House rejected the statement, denying that there was “inhumane treatment of illegal immigrants in the United States under this administration.”

The White House in a statement Wednesday pointed to past remarks from press secretary Karoline Leavitt, in which she defended the administration's treatment of immigrants and pointed to "significant inhumane treatment of illegal immigrants in the previous administration."

The Vatican did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Corbett said he and other members of the delegation look forward to seeing the pope continue to “demonstrate that solidarity” but are now focusing on taking the pope’s message back to the U.S. and supporting immigrants on the ground.

“We’ve got to be much more vigorous in our opposition and thoughtful about ways that we can push for some real reform,” he said."'

End of article...

What do you think about Leo and his interference into American policy?

And shouldn't he be more concerned about the scandals and heresies infecting the novus ordo, synodal church?

Pray for discernment and for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 

New Jersey legislature Passes ‘Travel Warning’ For Pro-Life States!!!

 "New Jersey Democrats’ bill would establish a so-called ‘reproductive health travel advisory’ urging residents to ‘reconsider travel’ to states with abortion restrictions."

From lifesitenews.com and written by Calvin Freiburger Tue Oct 7, 2025 - 5:20 pm EDT: New Jersey legislature passes ‘travel warning’ for pro-life states - LifeSite

Note: Gov. Murphy is a professed Catholic! 

Let me re-state that: Gov. Murphy is a "professed Catholic"...

If you read his justification for abandoning his Catholic faith, you just might get sick to your stomach!

What this amounts to, is that he has sold out the Catholic faith, Biblical and Church teachings in order to appease the radical left baby killers in his state.

For what, exactly?

Why, for votes of course...

I always wonder why the bishops of these characters haven't ex-communicated them?

There are several -- obvious -- answers; can you guess what at least one of them is? 

I wonder what he will say to Our Lord when he is face to Face at his Particular Judgment?  That is, if he doesn't repent of one of the most heinous sins that cry to Heaven for vengeance -- the killing of innocent pre-born babies.

This modernist monster must be prayed for!

(As an aside, how many of you still shop at Walmart?

As I previously revealed, we haven't shopped at Walmart for nearly three years now.

Why?

Because it is corporate policy that pays for their female employees to travel out of state to kill their tiny, pre-born babies!

Don't take my word for it, do a simple search and find out for yourself.)

From the article...

"TRENTON, New Jersey (LifeSiteNews) — The New Jersey Legislature has passed a travel warning to alert residents about the difficulty they may have getting abortions when traveling to other states.

Assembly Bill 4915 would establish a so-called “reproductive health travel advisory” notifying residents about the “extent to which states within the United States restrict access to reproductive healthcare services,” i.e., the murder of the unborn, through information about the abortion restrictions, funding options, or lack thereof in every other U.S. state. 

States would be categorized as blue for no restrictions, yellow for “increased caution” due to “restricted access to [so-called] reproductive medical care that could result in civil or criminal prosecution,” and red with a warning to “reconsider travel” due to “extremely restricted access” resulting in not only prosecution but also the supposed danger of “adverse medical outcome” (a common false charge against pro-life states).

Pregnancy Help News notes that the bill has been making its way through the legislature since last year and gained final approval this summer, although it still awaits a signature from Democrat Gov. Phil Murphy.

New Jersey’s current leadership is not only exceptionally protective of abortion but exceptionally hostile to those who disagree. Other bills before the legislature this year include measures to open pregnancy centers to punishment for so-called “deceptive or misleading advertising”; and prevent the state from cooperating with investigations or extradition requests relating to violations of other states’ pro-life laws. New Jersey is also one of four states to petition the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to remove all remaining REMS safety requirements monitoring adverse events of the abortion pill mifepristone.

Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court is slated to review the state’s efforts to legally harass pro-life pregnancy centers.

As previously covered by LifeSiteNews, New Jersey Democrat Attorney General Matt Platkin issued a consumer alert in 2022 branding pro-life crisis pregnancy centers as “seek(ing) to prevent people from accessing comprehensive reproductive health care,”  i.e., abortion and other anti-life practices. It was later revealed that his office collaborated with America’s largest abortion chain, Planned Parenthood, on the final draft of the alert.

First Choice Women’s Resource Centers sued Platkin over its efforts to force the nonprofit to “produce extensive documentation” without reasonable cause and under threat of punishment for “possible violations of ‘the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act’” in its promotion of Abortion Pill Reversal, a safe method of counteracting abortion pills by administering extra progesterone, the natural hormone that mifepristone blocks, which has a success rate over 60 percent.

Since Roe v. Wade’s fall, 12 states have banned all or most abortions. But the abortion lobby continues to work feverishly to cancel out those deterrents via deregulated interstate distribution of abortion pills, legal protection and financial support of interstate abortion travel, constructing new abortion facilities near borders shared by pro-life and pro-abortion states, making liberal states sanctuaries for those who want to evade or violate the laws of more pro-life neighbors, and embedding abortion “rights” in state constitutions.

Such amendments had great success in the first two years following Dobbs, further convincing many that America was solidifying in a more pro-abortion direction. But that too began to change in 2024, when pro-lifers defeated pro-abortion ballot initiatives in three of the 10 states who had them on the ballot."

End of very revealing and disturbing article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla

Slow To Anger: An Article From Crisis Magazine Regarding Pope Leo...

 Here is an article from crisismagazine.com and written by Eric Sammons: Slow to Anger - Crisis Magazine

(Let me know if you agree with Mr. Sammons' opinion.)

"A few years ago I wrote a column titled “Be Angry,” in which I defended anger as a legitimate response to the many scandalous actions of Pope Francis. The proximate cause of the article was the appointment of then-Archbishop Víctor Manuel Fernández as head of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith as well as some problematic papal selections for the Synod on Synodality, but those acts were just the latest in a string of scandals during the Francis pontificate. While I knew I was in danger of falling into the “angry trad” stereotype, I simply couldn’t pretend the last pontificate didn’t justify righteous anger.

I still think my anger was justified. Frankly, I’m still angry at the Francis pontificate: it was a disastrous reign that led many souls astray. Francis was akin to an abusive father, who attacked those most faithful to the Catholic religion. It’s understandable and reasonable for a child to be angry at a father who abuses him. As I wrote a few months after my “Be Angry” article, Francis had lost the benefit of the doubt. I also wrote that of course “we cannot let anger rule and control our hearts. Yes, be angry, but make sure it is a righteous anger.” Anger is a dangerous emotion, but it’s not always inappropriate.

Now we have a new Supreme Pontiff in Pope Leo XIV, and a lot of Catholics are starting to get angry with him, particularly after last week. And as weeks go, Leo did have a bad one. First, he seemed to suggest that Catholics who accept the perennial teaching of the Church regarding the permissibility of the death penalty were not “pro-life.” Then, he essentially endorsed Cardinal Cupich’s evil plan to give a lifetime achievement award to a pro-abortion Catholic politician. Finally, the pope presided over a weird environmental gathering in which he blessed a large block of ice. These actions produced many denunciations and much anger in Catholicland. Beyond last week’s actions, some Catholics are already assuming the worst regarding the pope’s first apostolic exhortation, due to be released on October 9, on the subject of the poor and social justice. 

Although Leo clearly had some missteps last week (and will continue to have them in the future), I’m not angry and I don’t think other Catholics should be, either. Does this mean I’ve changed my attitude about anger since my previous column? Perhaps a bit, but moreso I believe the situations are not the same. 

My columns on being angry and on Francis’ loss of the benefit of the doubt were published in 2023, a full ten years after Jorge Bergoglio’s election. He had a long history of undermining the faith and attacking the faithful. The catalog of problematic papal acts was large and growing. The potential for justified anger, in other words, had been perculating over a long period of time.

St. James in his epistle writes, “Know this, my beloved brethren. Let every man be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger, for the anger of man does not work the righteousness of God” (James 1:19-20, emphasis added). While justified and righteous at times, anger—particularly toward a pope—should not be the default reaction for a Catholic; it should be something that occurs only in extreme situations, and after serious contemplation and consideration. In the case of Pope Francis in 2023, even one who was very slow to anger realized that anger was justified. Pope Leo, on the other hand, has been Supreme Pontiff for only five months; being angry at him already is the definition of “quick to anger.”

Don’t get me wrong: I’m not saying one cannot be critical of certain words and acts of our Holy Father. But there’s a difference between careful, calm criticism and anger.I’m not saying one cannot be critical of certain words and acts of our Holy Father. But there’s a difference between careful, calm criticism and anger.

Why are people so quick to be angry at our new pope? Surely the society in which we live in party to blame. It promotes and platforms anger like never before. Social media in particular is fueled by anger: the algorithm rewards anger, so that’s what fills our timelines and influences our emotions. 

Yet I don’t think that’s the main driver behind today’s anger at the new pope. I think it’s a hangover effect from Pope Francis. For twelve years the Catholic faithful endured a pope who was, as I’ve said, an abusive father; a man who palpably despised us and what we believe. Now we suddenly have a new father, and so all the emotional baggage from the last father, which is difficult to jettison, is transferred onto him. Any mistake Leo makes brings us back to our feelings toward Francis and projects those feelings onto Leo. This, however, is unfair and uncharitable toward our new Holy Father, and it violates the biblical command to be “slow to anger.”

I have no idea how the Leo pontificate will unfold, and it’s possible we’ll reach the point where it’s clearly justified to be angry at him. Yet Leo is not Francis. There’s no indication that he hates us or hates the traditions of the Church. To look for reasons to be angry with him is, first of all, counterproductive in addressing the crisis in the Church today, for it hides our legitimate criticisms behind a flurry of emotional outbursts. It’s also spiritually destructive to the soul who engages in unnecessary anger. What does it profit a man to fight for the Church and forfeit his soul?

We can lament papal mistakes, and we can urge the pope and other Church officials to more fully embrace the traditional faith as handed on to us, but let’s take a step back, remain calm in our criticisms, and carry on in the faith. Let’s follow the advice of St. James, to be “slow to anger, for the anger of man does not work the righteousness of God.”

Author

• 
  Eric Sammons

  Eric Sammons is the editor-in-chief of Crisis Magazine and the author of Moral Money. 

End of article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla

The Evidence Keeps Piling Up Condemning The Filthy, Deadly Covid Shot!

 The brave doctors who warned the American people about the long-term dangers of taking the abortion-tainted covid shot, have since been vindicated as evidence keeps piling up that the jab is responsible for increased cancer rates and other debilitating health issues!

Now, an enormous study from South Korea -- involving 8.4 million of the population! -- shows the horrendous and chilling effect of the deadly shot!

Yet, the various governments at the local, state and even at the federal levels, in many cases, mandated the shot -- even for pregnant women!

Here is the result of this devastating study: from thegatewaypundit.com and written by the Vigilant Fox Oct. 6, 2025 4:30 pm: Devastating COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effect Confirmed by New Data: Study | The Gateway Pundit | by Vigilant Fox

"In one of the greatest violations of medical ethics in modern history, a new study from South Korea has uncovered devastating consequences from promoting and mandating the COVID-19 injections on the population.

These shots were pushed on babies and pregnant women, directly contradicting the ethical rule against introducing new medical interventions to such vulnerable groups before long-term effects are fully understood.

But they weren’t just aggressively promoted; they were enforced. Refusing the COVID-19 injection could cost you your job, bar you from concerts, businesses, and museums, and, in some cases, even deny you a life-saving surgery unless you complied with the mandate.

Now, as many doctors long warned, the consequences of such reckless health policy are surfacing, and one of the most alarming outcomes is a dramatic rise in cancer risk.

A large-scale population study out of South Korea has now found a 27% overall increase in cancer linked to the COVID-19 injections that were marketed as “safe and effective.”

Dr. John Campbell noted: “There’s a one in a thousand chance that this result arose by chance.” He illustrated the overall cancer rise with a stark graph, as seen in the short video below:

short video below:

on Reveals the Real Reason He Walks Away From Trump

The Real Story Behind His Exit No One Saw Coming

Video Player

00:00

01:19

With regard to the details of the study, Children’s Health Defense reports:

The study used data from 2021–2023 for over 8.4 million people in South Korea’s National Health Insurance Service database. The sample was split into two groups based on vaccination status. The vaccinated sample was further split into booster and non-booster groups.

Researchers tracked the patients for one year. The vaccinated group was tracked following vaccination. The results showed a statistically significant higher risk of cancer in the vaccinated group, including:

 • Overall cancer: 27% higher risk

• Breast cancer: 20% higher risk

• Colorectal cancer: 28% higher risk

• Gastric cancer: 34% higher risk

• Lung cancer: 53% higher risk

• Prostate cancer: 69% higher risk

• Thyroid cancer: 35% higher risk

 

These results are nothing short of devastating. Our worst fears have become reality.

And the worst part is that it didn’t have to be this way. Health officials ignored caution, silenced dissent, and turned public health into a reckless experiment.

Now the consequences of such reckless policies have turned the COVID wave into a health tsunami. The longer this issue is ignored, the greater the damage will become. It’s time for health officials to take responsibility for what they’ve done."

Link to full CHD article.

Dr. John Campbell’s full video breakdown and comments:

Find more stories like this at VigilantFox.com

Submit additional information.

End of revealing and disturbing article...

By the way, how many have seen the brainwashed folks still walking around with face diapers?  

Stunning!

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for  us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla