Thursday, September 18, 2025

Kash Patel Says FBI Officials Have Been Fired For Role In Targeting Latin Mass Catholics!

 It's about time...

But I bet there are still far too many moles embedded deep in the inner sanctum of the FBI and other agencies of the "deep state" along with their God-hating cronies...

We all knew that the former director of the FBI, C. Wray, was lying through his teeth, read: perjury!   

I ask, why hasn't he been brought up on the charge of perjury, convicted and thrown in jail??

From lifesitenews.com comes this revelation: Kash Patel says FBI officials have been fired for role in targeting Latin Mass Catholics - LifeSite and written by Emily Mangiaracina 

Israel Is Committing Genocide. This Is A Fact, Not An Opinion.

 I could post more than a few articles to show the fact of genocide being executed by the atheistic, Christ-hating Israelis, but I will post this one: Israel Is Committing Genocide. This Is A Fact, Not An Opinion. – Caitlin Johnstone

The subheading: "At this point the only people who still deny that Israel is committing genocide are those who want to make sure nobody does anything to stop Israel from committing genocide."

"A UN inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, and that Israeli authorities have “intended to kill as many Palestinians as possible” in the enclave.

Israel has responded to the UN report by calling it Hamas and antisemitic, because that’s all they’ve got. The Israeli Foreign Ministry released a statement claiming the report was authored by “individuals serving as Hamas proxies, notorious for their openly antisemitic positions.”

Blah, blah, blah. The report is Hamas and antisemitic. All human rights organizations are Hamas and antisemitic. There’s a giant global antisemitic Hamas conspiracy dedicated to making it appear as though Israel is committing genocide, just to make Jewish people feel sad.

At this point the only people who still deny that Israel is committing genocide are those who want to make sure nobody does anything to stop Israel from committing genocide.

The list of humanitarian institutions who accuse Israel of genocide now includes:

1. The United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory

2. The International Association of Genocide Scholars

3. B’Tselem (an Israeli organization)

4. Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (another Israeli organization)

5. Amnesty International

6. Doctors Without Borders

7. The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights

8. Human Rights Watch

9. The International Federation for Human Rights

10. The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention

The list of humanitarian institutions who say Israel is NOT committing genocide in Gaza includes:

1. Nobody

2. No one

3. Zero

4. Nothing

5. Nada

6. Zilch

7. Sweet damn all

8. A complete absence

9. Diddly squat

10. Bupkis

It is not okay to treat the fact that Israel is committing genocide like it’s a matter of opinion. Every relevant human rights institution on earth says it’s a genocide. Zero equivalent institutions say it’s not. This is a settled matter.

People who deny that it’s a genocide deserve to be taken exactly as seriously as flat earthers. They’re just an extremely evil and destructive version of the thing flat earthers are.

You don’t see news articles about NASA with journalists adding “an agency which many believe is a government hoax designed to trick us into accepting ball earth theory” to their reporting. If a guest mentions Antarctica on the BBC, the news anchor doesn’t interrupt them to say “and we should say here that flat earth theorists deny the existence of that continent, maintaining that it is actually a wall of ice holding the oceans in place.”

You also don’t see reporting which treats accepted science about space and our planet like it’s an opinion held by some. You never see “which many scientists claim exists” when a report discusses outer space, or mentions of the horizon mitigated with words like “which some hold is due to the curvature of the earth rather than laws of perspective and light refraction”. They’re just treated as established facts, and those who disagree with the established facts are not taken seriously.

The genocide in Gaza should be no different. As the old adage goes, if one side says it’s raining and the other says it isn’t, your job isn’t to quote both sides, your job is to look out the window.

The window’s right there, western media. And it’s pouring genocide."

End of very revealing article...

________________

(The best way to make sure you see everything I write is to get on my free mailing list. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. Click here for links for my social media, books, merch, and audio/video versions of each article. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.)

Pray for the defeat of these Christ-hating, life-hating Israelis and for their conversion...

Pray too for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 







Wednesday, September 17, 2025

["]Cardinal["] Fernández Claims Synodality Is Not A ‘Revision Of Doctrine And Morality’

 If this topic wasn't so important and soul-impacting, it would be outrageously laughable!

And guess where this message of "synodality" comes from?  Why none other than that bastion of Church teaching and Tradition: "Cardinal" Fernandez -- head, of perhaps, one of the most important if not the most important dicastery in the Vatican: prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith.

A true fox guarding the henhouse!

I wonder how many practicing; traditionally minded Catholics fully expected this creature to be removed from his present powerful position and relegated to be nuncio to Iran or Timbuktu? 

Yet, under Leo, he is still in his position and still spewing his doubletalk attempting to justify the creation of a "new synodal church" -- note that those are the words of these ultra-modernist monsters who want to create a new "church" made in the image and likeness of man, built not for the salvation of souls, but for a "better world," to fight "climate change," fight for the "rights" of illegal aliens who invade sovereign countries, another endless list I'm afraid...

I'm going to post an article from lifesitenews.com and written by Michael Haynes, Snr. Vatican Correspondent Wed Sep 17, 2025 - 11:38 am EDT: Cardinal Fernández claims synodality is not a 'revision of doctrine and morality' - LifeSite, and see if you can pick out the outrageous statements coming from this character...

"VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — The prefect of the Vatican’s doctrinal office has rejected the notion that synodality is “a matter of listening to everyone in order to carry out a democratic revision of doctrine and morality.”

As prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández has been a key figure in the latter years of Pope Francis’ pontificate and thus the Synod on Synodality. The synod – arguably Francis’ biggest project and legacy – has been firmly critiqued by many over its style, methodology, and openness to questioning unchanging Church teaching. Indeed, addressing the conclave which elected Pope Leo XIV, Cardinal Joseph Zen described the synod’s outcome as a “matter of life and death” for the Church.

It was on this topic that Fernández spoke recently, while addressing bishops who were named in the past year. But while he opened by highlighting Leo’s commitment to the Synod on Synodality, Fernández also sought to downplay concerns about the event.

“Many priests have doubts, questions, disinterest, and rejection regarding the proposal of synodality,” said the Argentine cardinal. “Some groups see bad intentions behind this synodal process and reject it categorically. That is why it is good to separate the wheat from the chaff. To do this, it is best to start by taking criticism and mistrust seriously.”

Continuing, he stated:

If we truly pay attention to the signs of the times, we must recognize that groups have grown up that do not expect weakness and confusion, that do not want a “light” Church. Even when the Church changes certain things, it is generally hoped that this is not a whim of a few, but is based on solid reflection.

We must say no to this distorted form of synodality, which wants a democratic change of doctrine, recognizing that it is only the claim of some minority and ideologized groups.

Such an intervention is notable, since it marks perhaps the first time that widespread concerns about the Synod on Synodality have been given airtime by a prominent member of the Roman Curia.

Fernández himself is in charge of a synod study group examining a question which is already infallibly decided – namely, the possibility of women deacons. The very existence of this study group has caused much consternation from many in the Church, including prominent figures such as Cardinals Raymond Burke and Joseph Zen.

Fernández outlined various “distorted forms” of synodality, pointing to what he posited as excesses from the part of the laity and the clergy. These included seeing it as an “elitist democracy” or a survey conducting machine, a tick-box exercise or “a universal form of synodality that ignores local differences.”

Such erroneous forms of interpreting the Synod on Synodality, he said, would generate “reasonable” opposition and people react “to something that is not authentic synodality.”

With this in mind, the cardinal offered his interpretation of the meaning of synodality – a notable instance as definitions of the term have been lacking from the Vatican so far. He stated:

A synodal journey means first and foremost that all members of the Church are involved in evangelization, so as to form a participatory communion. It is not just a matter of holding fraternal meetings, but of everyone participating and contributing so that a diocese can be fruitful in its mission. No one would deny the value of this proposal. However, it is one thing not to deny it and another to fully realize it.

Referencing a poignant quotation from Pope Francis’ response to the dubia on the synod submitted by Cardinal Raymond Burke and four other cardinals, Fernández added that the synod “is about seeking various ways in which the whole Church can truly be experienced as a people.” At the time of the dubia in 2023, Fernández made the notable move of publicly responding to and rebuking Burke and his fellow dubia signatories.

Drawing once again from Pope Francis, Fernández posited the synod and synodality itself as an identity for the Church: “But above all, it is a way of being and acting that must characterize the whole Church, from the most remote country chapel to the universal Church.”

Indeed, Francis previously stated in Canada in 2022 that “the Church is either synodal or it is not Church.”

As should be expected, Fernández’s defense of synodality continued at greater length, drawing from the customary language and passages espoused and employed by the synod architects over recent years. Throughout this defense, he argued strongly that synodality must mean everyone acting in accord, creating a peculiar example to try and evidence his message:

Of course, the priest presides over the Eucharist, which is the source of life, but he can cause the Eucharist itself to lose its fruitfulness when he no longer creates the conditions around him for people to open themselves more and more to the action of the Eucharist…

On the other hand, those who live and work synodally in their community have thousands of different friends from whom they receive multiple stimuli to develop a ministry full of richness, reflecting the inexhaustible richness of the Gospel and the inexhaustible fruitfulness of divine grace. Then, yes, the Eucharist they celebrate is a sign and source of life and communion.

Similarly present were themes often used by Pope Francis:

A synodal Church with a missionary heart is never an implacable judge who bars the way.

This openness to all is essential in true “synodality,” which truly widens the tent of the Church, rather than transforming it into a collection of small power groups.

Fernández ended with a note that, while not a strident as some of the voices at the synod, nevertheless embodied the spirit which they practice. Conversing about the impact of the synod on the priesthood, he said:

Of course, a synodality that truly makes the priestly ministry fruitful calls us to a true conversion, and requires time, time for specific, practical, and not only doctrinal formation, time for the exercise of lay charisms and maturation in this exercise. But if we do not begin, we will never get there.

Such language – “if we do not begin, we will never get there” – is indeed emblematic of that used by the move vocal pro-LGBT and female ordination activists at the synod.

 It suggests that Fernández, whilst rowing back some of the vigor and invective of these activists, is nevertheless pushing ahead with the synodal project bequeathed by Francis and appearing to be continued by Leo."

End of article...

These modernist monsters have absolutely no shame, absolutely not one iota of the Catholic Faith and care nothing for the salvation of souls, but only for their own power and position in this life, and to hell with what awaits them in the next!!

Pray for their defeat and for their conversion...

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 






 

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

The Grave Moral And Spiritual Rot Of The Heretical Association Of US ["]Catholic["] Priests (AUSCP) -- And The Scandalous Partnership With The USCCB!!

 WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!

BEWARE -- THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE CONTAINS SOME GRAPHIC LANGUAGE ABOUT SEXUAL MORALITY -- OR, SHOULD I SAY, IMMORALITY, AMONG THOSE TREASONOUS MALES WEARING THE ROMAN COLLAR!

AGAIN, BEWARE!

From lifesitenews.com and written by William Mahoney Mon Sep 15, 2025 - 5:45 pm EDT: USCCB partners with heretical priest group despite obscenity at meeting - LifeSite

"(Lepanto Institute) — The heretical Association of US Catholic Priests (AUSCP) announced earlier this year that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) approached the Association, asking it to host a virtual consultation on the USCCB’s laity document. Public materials describe the event as a joint effort between AUSCP and the USCCB, presenting it as a continuation of “synodal engagement.”

The AUSCP has a long history of promoting views in direct conflict with immutable Catholic teachings regarding the “ordination” of women, human sexual morality, the sacraments, and the nature of the priesthood.

In the latest announcement, the AUSCP confirmed that the primary speaker will be Sr. Marie Kolbe Zamora, who was an official in the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops during the global synod process. According to the AUSCP, she will speak about her experience in Rome, what she believes is the importance of “synodality” to the Church in the United States, and how “deep listening” has reportedly changed her own spiritual life.

This collaboration between the USCCB and the AUSCP indicates that it moves under the banner of “synodality,” despite the grave moral and theological concerns pertaining to the AUSCP. Just three months ago, the AUSCP held its annual assembly in San Antonio. There, Catholic priests spoke openly about the mortal sin of masturbation as a form of “prayer.” These remarks were delivered from the floor, in public, during official sessions. The room responded with laughter, not outrage. Nobody in attendance raised an objection. No statement of correction followed.

And now, this heterodox organization is claiming a role in shaping national Catholic policy for lay formation.

This article examines the facts: the AUSCP’s promotion of doctrinal dissent, the bishops’ silent or not-so-silent participation, and the institutional failure to draw clear moral lines. It also reveals the deeper cost of collaboration with an organization that no longer hides its anti-Catholic agenda.

At stake is more than theological confusion. What emerges is a betrayal of mission, of trust, and of the faithful themselves.

Evidence of collaboration

The Association of United States Catholic Priests (AUSCP) is not merely offering commentary on a USCCB initiative. It is formally hosting a consultation on it.

The event, titled AUSCP Consultation on USCCB Laity Document, is scheduled for September 17, 2025. It is being conducted virtually, and registration is handled entirely through AUSCP’s own website. The confirmation email sent to participants includes branding from the AUSCP, references the USCCB by name, and describes the consultation as part of the Church’s “synodal engagement” process.


But this consultation was not initiated by the AUSCP. According to the AUSCP’s August 6 newsletter called “Wisdom Wednesday,” the USCCB reached out to the AUSCP, asking them to host “a call to get input from priests and laity on the new USCCB Laity Document.” The AUSCP further claimed in this newsletter that the USCCB “strongly recommend that you invite your episcopal liaison, advisor, or moderator (or a bishop or bishops active in your group) to be part of the listening sessions.”

On August 17, the AUSCP sent out an email indicating that the “USCCB has invited AUSCP to host a Conversation in the Spirit between Clergy and Laity.” Additionally, the AUSCP indicated that the USCCB’s associate director for the laity, Paul Jarzembowski, would be providing a testimony on the topic, “Why is this listening session important to the USCCB and how will it impact the US Church?“

Screenshots from the official registration and event page show the USCCB name featured prominently. The AUSCP’s announcements, which have been circulated since July 27, refer to the consultation as part of the national synodal process. The most recent update includes details about the keynote speaker: Sr. Marie Kolbe Zamora, who was an official in the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops in Rome. She is scheduled to discuss her time in Rome and the supposed relevance of “deep listening” within the Church in the United States.

This consultation is not a hypothetical scenario. It is a real event, promoted for weeks by the AUSCP, featuring a high-profile speaker who participated in the Synod at the Vatican. The organizers claim to speak not just with theological insight, but with synodal authority.

There is no ambiguity. The USCCB’s laity document is the topic. The AUSCP claims that the USCCB reached out to them to host the call. The AUSCP identified a USCCB staffer as a participant. The AUSCP is leading the conversation. The name of the bishops’ conference is being invoked as a partner.

This is the context in which the next section must be understood, not as an isolated scandal or miscommunication, but as part of an official collaboration, made visible through registration forms, promotional pages, and confirmation emails. At the AUSCP assembly, we obtained a photo of the USCCB’s booth there, as well as one of the business cards sitting on the table belonging to Marc J. Delmonico, USCCB assistant director for the certification of ecclesial ministry.

Previous USCCB-AUSCP collaboration

In 2022, we reported that the USCCB’s Office of Certification for Ecclesial Ministry was a vendor at the AUSCP’s assembly that year. In addition to photographing the USCCB’s table at the AUSCP’s Assembly, we also obtained the business card for Dr. DelMonico, the director for the USCCB office vending at the event.

In the course of our investigation into this matter, we discovered that DelMonico didn’t just happen to show up to the AUSCP’s assembly – he identified himself as an actual member of the AUSCP. In 2020, Delmonico wrote the following on his own website, under the headline “Association of U.S. Catholic Priests (AUSCP) Virtual National Conference 2020”:

“I am participating in this virtual gathering of the largest association of U.S. Catholic priests as an associate (non-clergy) member of the AUSCP. Their annual event is focused on the theme of “Our Catholic Faith in the Political World.” Opportunities for an online retreat and keynotes on church teaching in the context of legislative advocacy, preaching to the political needs of today’s society, practical action during the 2020 election year, and more. Very modest and daily or all-inclusive rates are available and anyone can register for the event. The AUSCP is an organization which is deeply committed to collaborative ministry with lay ecclesial ministry leaders and other lay ministers in today’s church. Read more and register here.

Subsequently, in January of 2021, the AUSCP hosted DelMonico as a speaker for a webinar with the title, “God’s Own Vintage: Developments in Lay Ecclesial Ministry 15 Years after Co-Workers in the Vineyard of the Lord.”

Additionally, Abp. John Wester of Santa Fe, New Mexico, has been routinely identified as the AUSCP’s “Episcopal Consultor” (previously, “Episcopal Moderator“) and Bp. John Stowe of Lexington, Kentucky, is formally recognized as a “member” of the AUSCP. Both bishops (as well as others) are routinely spotted at the AUSCP’s annual assemblies.

The scandalous moral record of the AUSCP

The Association of United States Catholic Priests (AUSCP) has been warned, documented, and exposed repeatedly for its rejection of Catholic teaching. Its leadership promotes “women’s ordination,” endorses homosexual relationships among clergy, and embraces spiritual ideologies that collapse morality into sentiment. Yet many bishops of the United States continue to give them an audience.

At their June 2025 assembly in San Antonio, AUSCP members crossed yet another line. Priests stood at microphones and discussed masturbation as a form of prayer. One, who identified as homosexual, described his personal practice of sexual self-gratification in the context of spiritual reflection. Another affirmed the act, arguing that it prevents worse “explosions” of energy.

No one corrected them. No one rebuked them. The room laughed.

This was not a candid moment in a private conversation. It was a public gathering of priests and religious in an official ecclesial setting. Bishops were in the room. They heard the comments and said nothing.

Lepanto Institute published the audio and transcript. The scandal is real, documented, and accessible.

Instead of disassociating from the AUSCP after this display, the bishops of the United States allowed the group to move forward with a consultation on the USCCB’s own laity document. Not a single public statement was issued. No disciplinary action was taken. No lines were drawn.

This is not a lapse in oversight. It is a pattern.

The AUSCP continues to promote figures like heterodox Fr. Ronald Rolheiser, whose writing reframes sexual desire as a mystical encounter. In AUSCP events and resources, Rolheiser insists that the divine comes to us through sexuality, without sufficient moral distinction. This attempted fusion of sacredness and lust weakens the Church’s witness and confuses the faithful. It is not accidental. It is intentional.

Fr. Frederick Daley, a longtime AUSCP member, is openly homosexual and lives with another man. He has celebrated so-called “Pride Masses” using altered Trinitarian formulas, such as “Creator, Redeemer, Sanctifier.” These abuses have been reported, recorded, and confronted.

He remains a priest in good standing.

Despite Abp. Wester’s alleged oversight of the AUSCP, there is no record of his public correction of Fr. Daley. There is no statement from him condemning the AUSCP’s theological trajectory. Despite years of documented defiance, he continues to lend credibility to the organization by his silent presence.

This is the moral record of the AUSCP. It is not a misunderstanding or an isolated incident. It is the fruit of an organization that has lost its Catholic identity and of a hierarchy that refuses to act.

Other fully-documented reports we’ve produced on the AUSCP reveal the following:

USCCB given the opportunity to clarify

Before publication, the Lepanto Institute made direct efforts to obtain clarity from the USCCB regarding its involvement with the AUSCP-hosted consultation scheduled for September 17, 2025.

A formal inquiry was submitted to Archbishop Timothy Broglio, president of the USCCB, via his secretary, Sr. Lisa Marie Drover, on Tuesday, September 10. The message included:

  • Documentation showing the AUSCP publicly presenting the consultation as a collaborative effort with the USCCB
  • Evidence of AUSCP’s long-standing record of doctrinal dissent
  • Audio transcripts from the June 2025 assembly, with the aforementioned scandalous comments
  • A clear and fair deadline for response: 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Wednesday, September 11

The questions posed to Archbishop Broglio were precise:

  1. Was the USCCB formally collaborating with the AUSCP for this consultation?
  2. Had any bishop or office within the USCCB authorized the event?
  3. Did the USCCB consider the AUSCP a theologically trustworthy partner for shaping lay formation?
  4. Would the USCCB be issuing a statement to clarify or withdraw its name from the event?

No response was received. Not from Archbishop Broglio. Not from the USCCB Communications Office. Not from any spokesperson.

This is not neutral. It is not procedural. It is an institutional shrug in the face of grave scandal.

The same bishops entrusted with shepherding the faithful through a spiritual crisis have allowed their name to be used by an organization where lust is preached as “prayer,” Holy Orders are reduced to gender expression, and sin is romanticized in the name of “deep listening.”

When given the chance to defend the faith – and the faithful – they declined.

‘Accompaniment’ without truth is betrayal

The AUSCP does not hide what it is. Its members speak plainly. They promote “women’s ordination.” They glorify sexual sin and a host of perversions. They hold retreats centered on “erotic mysticism” disguised as theology. They gather, speak, publish, and record.

The bishops see it.

They’ve heard the audio.

They’ve read the documents.

They know exactly what the AUSCP believes and teaches, and they continue to give them a seat at the table.

This is not “walking together.” It is walking away from the Lord, and from His Bride, dragging others with them.

To invoke “accompaniment” without truth is not compassion. It is betrayal. It leaves the faithful – especially the laity – unarmed against wolves in clerical clothing. It replaces doctrine with a one-sided, wicked monologue under the guise of “dialogue.” It tells dissenters they are welcome, and it tells the faithful to stay quiet.

This consultation on the laity document is not an isolated blunder. It is the natural fruit of years of silence, false charity, and refusal to discipline. It is what happens when bishops refuse to name heresy but readily platform its prophets.

Catholics who love the faith – laity, priests, and yes, bishops – must make a choice. Not between left and right. Not between style and tone. But between fidelity and betrayal. Between up forever, or down without end.

The AUSCP has made its choice. The only question now is whether the bishops will continue to follow them, or finally stand up and lead.

Contact Abp. Broglio and the USCCB. Respectfully, but firmly, demand that the USCCB formally separate itself from the AUSCP. Call for a formal condemnation of the AUSCP and for bishops to forbid priests under their charge from being members or from having any contact with the AUSCP, whatsoever.

(Reprinted with permission from the Lepanto Institute.)

End of very revealing and disturbing article...

Pray for the defeat of these modernist monsters -- and for their conversion to the Catholic Faith!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla























Kash Patel Says FBI Officials Have Been Fired For Role In Targeting Latin Mass Catholics!

 It's about time... But I bet there are still far too many moles embedded deep in the inner sanctum of the FBI and other agencies of the...