Thursday, June 20, 2024

Breaking! This Is Huge! Is Archbishop Vigano To Be Ex-Communicated By Apostate Rome Authorities???

  I guess most folks -- who haven't been living in a cave -- knew this was coming...

It has been revealed that the good Archbishop Vigano has been summoned to Rome to face the spiritual guillotine of ex-communication!

Here are two articles both from lifesitenews.com and, one, written by LifeSiteNews staff, and the other by Archbishop Vigano himself to refute the nonsensical accusations lodged against Ab. Vigano...

BREAKING: Vatican charges Archbishop Viganò with schism for 'denial of the legitimacy of Pope Francis' - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

And...

Archbishop Viganò responds to schism charge: ‘I regard the accusations against me as an honor' - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

Well, as I said, this was bound to happen, as the anti-Christ regime in the Vatican had to do "something" to discredit and make an example of those who defy their diabolical, anti-Catholic power and squash anyone who dares to point out and fight the errors, heresies, scandals and confusion emanating from Rome, under the leader of the pack, Bergoglio.

Here is the first article: "The Vatican's doctrinal office summoned Archbishop Viganò to appear before an 'extrajudicial penal trial' on June 20 over accusations of 'schism' owing to a 'denial of the legitimacy of Pope Francis, rupture of communion with Him, and rejection of the Second Vatican Council.'

(LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) has instigated an “extrajudicial penal trial” against Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, accusing the prelate of “the crime of schism.”

In an email signed by Monsignor John Kennedy of the dicastery’s Disciplinary Section and sent to the Italian archbishop, who served as papal nuncio to the United States from 2011 to 2016, the dicastery summoned Viganò to the Vatican on June 20 that he “may take notice of the accusations and evidence concerning the crime of schism.” Namely, the dicastery notified the archbishop that he stands accused of making “public statements which result in a denial of the elements necessary to maintain communion with the Catholic Church; denial of the legitimacy of Pope Francis, rupture of communion with Him, and rejection of the Second Vatican Council.”


In response, Viganò defended himself stating, “as a successor of the apostles, to be in full communion with the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, with the Magisterium of the Roman Pontiffs, and with the uninterrupted doctrinal, moral, and liturgical Tradition which they have faithfully preserved.”

Regarding the accusations against him “as an honor,” Viganò stressed his desire to “repudiate, reject, and condemn the scandals, errors, and heresies of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who manifests an absolutely tyrannical management of power, exercised against the purpose that legitimizes authority in the Church: an authority that is vicarious of that of Christ, and as such must obey Him alone.”

After arguing that “[no] Catholic worthy of the name can be in communion with this ‘Bergoglian church,’ because it acts in clear discontinuity and rupture with all the popes of history and with the Church of Christ,” Viganò asked Catholics to “pray that the Lord will come to the aid of His Church and give courage to those who are persecuted for their Faith.”

This story is developing…

End of first article...

Now, the response from Archbishop Vigano...

'I am honored not to have – and indeed I do not want – any ecclesial communion' with Pope Francis, Archbishop Viganò wrote, adding his repudiation of 'the neo-modernist errors inherent in the Second Vatican Council.'

Editor’s note: The following is an announcement from Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò regarding the start of his extrajudicial criminal trial for schism.

(LifeSiteNews) — The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith has informed me, with a simple email, of the initiation of an extrajudicial penal trial against me, with the accusation of having committed the crime of schism and charging me of having denied the legitimacy of “Pope Francis,” of having broken communion “with Him,” and of having rejected the Second Vatican Council.

I have been summoned to the Palace of the Holy Office on June 20, in person or represented by a canon lawyer. I assume that the sentence has already been prepared, given that it is an extrajudicial process.

READ: Vatican charges Archbishop Viganò with schism for ‘denial of the legitimacy of Pope Francis’

I regard the accusations against me as an honor. I believe that the very wording of the charges confirms the theses that I have repeatedly defended in my various addresses. It is no coincidence that the accusation against me concerns the questioning of the legitimacy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and the rejection of Vatican II: the council represents the ideological, theological, moral, and liturgical cancer of which the Bergoglian “synodal church” is the necessary metastasis.

It is necessary for the episcopate, the clergy, and the people of God to seriously ask themselves whether it is consistent with the profession of the Catholic faith to passively witness the systematic destruction of the Church by its leaders, just as other subversives are destroying civil society. Globalism calls for ethnic substitution: Bergoglio promotes uncontrolled immigration and calls for the integration of cultures and religions. Globalism supports LGBT ideology: Bergoglio authorizes the blessing of same-sex couples and imposes on the faithful the acceptance of homosexualism, while covering up the scandals of his protégés and promoting them to the highest positions of responsibility. Globalism imposes the green agenda: Bergoglio worships the idol of the Pachamama, writes delirious encyclicals about the environment, supports the Agenda 2030, and attacks those who question the theory of man-made global warming.

He goes beyond his role in matters that strictly pertain to science, but always and only in one direction: a direction that is diametrically opposed to what the Church has always taught. He has mandated the use of experimental gene serums, which caused very serious damage, death and sterility, calling them “an act of love,” in exchange for funding from pharmaceutical companies and philanthropic foundations. His total alignment with the “Davos religion” is scandalous. Wherever governments at the service of the World Economic Forum have introduced or extended abortion, promoted vice, legitimized homosexual unions or gender transition, encouraged euthanasia, and tolerated the persecution of Catholics, not a word has been spent in defense of the faith or morals that are threatened, or in support of the civil battles of so many Catholics who have been abandoned by the Vatican and the bishops. Not a word for the persecuted Catholics in China, with the complicity of the Holy See, which considers Beijing’s billions more important than the lives and freedom of thousands of Chinese who are faithful to the Roman Church.

In the “synodal church” presided over by Bergoglio, no schism is recognized among the German episcopate, or among the government-appointed bishops who have been consecrated in China without the mandate of Rome. Because their action is consistent with the destruction of the Church, and therefore must be concealed, minimized, tolerated, and finally encouraged.

In these 11 years of “pontificate” the Catholic Church has been humiliated and discredited above all because of the scandals and corruption of the leaders of the hierarchy, which have been totally ignored even as the most ruthless Vatican authoritarianism raged against faithful priests and religious, small communities of traditional nuns, and communities tied to the Latin Mass.

This one-sided zeal is reminiscent of Cromwell’s fanaticism, typical of those who defy providence in the presumption of knowing that they are finally at the top of the hierarchical pyramid, free to do and undo as they please without anyone objecting to anything. And this work of destruction, this willingness to renounce the salvation of souls in the name of a human peace that denies God is not an invention of Bergoglio, but the main (and unmentionable) purpose of those who used a council to contradict the Catholic Magisterium and to begin to demolish the Church from within, in small steps, but always in a single direction, always with the indulgent tolerance or culpable inaction – if not the explicit approval – of the Roman authorities.

The Catholic Church has been slowly but surely taken over, and Bergoglio has been given the task of making it a philanthropic agency, the “church of humanity, of inclusion, of the environment” at the service of the New World Order. But this is not the Catholic Church: it is her counterfeit.

The resignation of Benedict XVI and the appointment by the St. Gallen Mafia of a successor in line with the diktats of the Agenda 2030 was intended to allow – and has succeeded in allowing – the global coup to take place with the complicity and authoritative support of the Church of Rome. Bergoglio is to the Church what other world leaders are to their nations: traitors, subversives, and final liquidators of traditional society who are certain of impunity. Bergoglio’s defect of consent (vitium consensus) in accepting his election is based precisely on the evident alienity of his action of government and magisterium with respect to what any Catholic of any age expects from the Vicar of Christ and the Successor of the Prince of the Apostles. Everything that Bergoglio does constitutes an offense and a provocation to the entire Catholic Church, to her saints of all times, to the martyrs who were killed in odium Fidei, and to the popes of all times until the Second Vatican Council.

This is also and principally an offense against the Divine Head of the Church, Our Lord Jesus Christ, whose sacred authority Bergoglio claims to exercise for the detriment of the mystical body, with an action that is too systematic and coherent to appear to be the fruit of mere incapacity. In the work of Bergoglio and his circle, the Lord’s warning is put into practice: “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the guise of lambs, but who are ravenous wolves at heart” (Mt 7:15).

I am honored not to have – and indeed I do not want – any ecclesial communion with them: theirs is a lobby, which conceals its complicity with the masters of the world in order to deceive many souls and prevent any resistance against the establishment of the Kingdom of the Antichrist.

In the face of the dicastery’s accusations, I claim, as successor of the apostles, to be in full communion with the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, with the Magisterium of the Roman pontiffs, and with the uninterrupted doctrinal, moral, and liturgical tradition which they have faithfully preserved.

I repudiate the neo-modernist errors inherent in the Second Vatican Council and in the so-called “post-conciliar magisterium,” in particular in matters of collegiality, ecumenism, religious freedom, the secularity of the state, and the liturgy.

I repudiate, reject, and condemn the scandals, errors, and heresies of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who manifests an absolutely tyrannical management of power, exercised against the purpose that legitimizes authority in the Church: an authority that is vicarious of that of Christ, and as such must obey Him alone. This separation of the papacy from its legitimizing principle, which is Christ the High Priest, transforms the ministerium into a self-referential tyranny.

No Catholic worthy of the name can be in communion with this “Bergoglian church,” because it acts in clear discontinuity and rupture with all the popes of history and with the Church of Christ.

WATCH: Cardinal Sarah warns against ‘practical atheism’

Fifty years ago, in that same Palace of the Holy Office, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was summoned and accused of schism for rejecting Vatican II. His defense is mine; his words are mine; and his arguments are mine – arguments before which the Roman authorities could not condemn him for heresy, having to wait instead for him to consecrate bishops so as to have the pretext of declaring him schismatic and then revoking his excommunication when he was already dead. The scheme is repeated even after half a century has demonstrated Archbishop Lefebvre’s prophetic choice.

In these times of apostasy, Catholics will find in pastors faithful to the mandate received from Our Lord an example and an encouragement to abide in the truth of Christ.

Depositum custodi, according to the apostle’s exhortation: as the time approaches when I will have to give an account to the Son of God of all my actions, I intend to persevere in the bonum certamen and not to fail in the witness of faith which is required of each one who, as bishop, has been endowed with the fullness of the priesthood and constituted successor of the apostles.

I invite all Catholics to pray that the Lord will come to the aid of His Church and give courage to those who are persecuted for their faith.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop"

End of article...

It is apparent that Archbishop Vigano is now undergoing a "white martyrdom"... Please pray for him!!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!!

Gene DeLalla 








Wednesday, June 19, 2024

Sick And Demonic State Of California! California Senate Approves Ban On Requiring Schools To Notify Parents Of Child’s Pronoun Change!!

 I can't believe that my former state of residence has one foot in hell and the other is stepping on a banana peel, ready to complete the slide into the fiery abyss...

I also have a good friend -- and Vietnam veteran brother I served with -- who still lives under the apostate, baby-killer, "Catholic" Gov. Newsom, who just loves to keep parents in the dark about their precious children and the perversion they are exposed to in Satan's school system.

Unfortunately, both the house and senate in California have a majority of madmen and madwomen who portray themselves as representatives of the people, when, in reality, they work for the demon!

From breitbart.com and written by SOPHIE AUSTIN Associated Press...

California Senate approves ban on requiring schools to notify parents of child's pronoun change - Breitbart

"The California Senate has approved a bill that would ban school districts from requiring teachers to notify parents if their child asks to go by a new pronoun at school

California Senate approves ban on requiring schools to notify parents of child’s pronoun change By SOPHIE AUSTIN Associated Press/Report for America The Associated Press SACRAMENTO, Calif.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — School districts in California would be barred from requiring teachers to notify parents if their child asks to go by a new pronoun at school under a bill the state Legislature is weighing amid legal battles over the rights of parents and gender-nonconforming students.

The state Senate approved the proposal Thursday, which would ban school districts from passing or enforcing policies requiring school staff to disclose a student’s gender identity or sexual orientation to anyone else without the child’s permission, with some exceptions. The goal is to protect students whose safety could be threatened if they live in unwelcoming households.

The issue is personal to Kai, a transgender man who recently graduated from high school within the Rocklin Unified School District near Sacramento and was treated for suicide attempts before coming out. He confided in a teacher “who had displayed her dedication and empathy toward all her students,” Kai said at a news conference last month.

“Having a trusted adult is paramount to ensuring a queer kid makes it to their next birthday,” he said. “If you care about kids, you’ll enact this legislation that will protect their well-being and protect their lives.”

Lawmakers approved the legislation along party lines after more than an hour of an emotional debate in which Democratic LGBTQ+ senators recounted stories about how they delayed coming out to their parents or were outed by someone else. They argued gender-nonconforming students should be able to come out to their families on their own terms. But Republican lawmakers said the state shouldn’t dictate whether school districts can enforce so-called parental notification policies and that schools have an obligation to be transparent with parents.

It is part of a nationwide debate over local school districts and the rights of parents and LGBTQ+ students. States across the country have sought to impose bans on gender-affirming care, bar trans athletes from girls and women’s sports, and require schools to “out” trans and nonbinary students to their parents. Some lawmakers in other states have introduced bills in their legislatures with broad language requiring that parents be notified of any changes to their child’s emotional health or well-being.

Republican state Sen. Kelly Seyarto, who represents Murrieta in Southern California, said schools should increase transparency with parents by notifying them of their child’s gender identification change.

“If we include the parents, that’s the best way to take something from people being angry and mad to developing a solution that works for everybody,” he said.

California officials shouldn’t prevent all parents from being notified because of the possibility that some parents may react badly, said Greg Burt, vice president of the California Family Council, a conservative Christian advocacy group.

“You don’t assume that all parents are unsafe,” Burt said. “That shouldn’t be the assumption.”

The bill now heads to the state Assembly, where it would need to pass in committees and on the floor before it can reach the desk of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, whose administration has fought school boards over the notification policies.

The debate over the policies is playing out in court cases across the state.

In August, Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, sued the Chino Valley Unified School District over the district’s notification rule, arguing it discriminated against gender-nonconforming students. A judge tentatively blocked parts of the policy, and the district later updated the rule to apply more broadly to when a child requests any change to their student records.

But in a case involving the Escondido Union School District in Southern California, a judge tentatively ruled to prevent the district from reprimanding teachers for notifying parents about their child’s gender identification change.

State Sen. Caroline Menjivar, who is lesbian, said on the Senate floor Thursday that she was outed to her mother when Menjivar was 16 years old.

“I came home to literally all my things on the front lawn, because I was kicked out,” the Democrat representing the San Fernando Valley said. “That’s what happens when parents don’t accept queer kids.”

Menjivar then went back into the closet so that she could continue living at home, she said. She didn’t come out again to her mother until she was 25 years old. Her mother is still not accepting, Menjivar, now 35, said.

“There are many queer kids in California who have these stories,” she said.

End of article...

___

The headline of this story has been updated to make clear that the measure approved by the Senate is a ban on requiring schools to notify parents of a child’s pronoun change.

Austin is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on under covered issues. Follow Austin on the social platform X: @sophieadanna

My comment: these people are sick -- morally and spiritually sick!

In Christian charity, we must pray for their conversion back to sanity, the Natural Law and the Ten Commandments of God almighty!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!!

Gene DeLalla 








Bishop Schneider: ‘LGBTQ Lobbies,’ Secular Powers Behind Pope Francis’ Homosexual ‘Blessings’ Document.

  "Bishop Schneider said the Vatican’s Fiducia Supplicans document ‘is neither authentically pastoral nor authentically magisterial’ and that priests who authorize homosexual ‘blessings’ are guilty of ‘grave spiritual harm.’"

From lifesitenews.com and written by Andreas Wailzer comes this: Bishop Schneider: 'LGBTQ lobbies,' secular powers behind Pope Francis' homosexual ‘blessings’ document - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

Frankly, if this is accurate, then this is more evidence of the corruption at the highest levels in the Vatican and adds another major scandal to an already long list of scandals since the beginning of the papacy of Bergoglio in 2013...

Here is the article in full...

One thing before I post the story... Bishop Schneider is not a "rad trad" by any stretch of the imagination, but he does value the perennial truths of the authentic Magisterium as opposed to the zeitgeist -- and groveling to the secular Marxists... 

"(LifeSiteNews) — Bishop Athanasius Schneider stated that “[s]ecular powers, ‘LGBTQ’ lobbies, and anti-Church agendas” are behind the publication of the Vatican’s heterodox document on homosexual “blessings,” Fiducia Supplicans.

In an extensive critique published in Crisis magazine, Schneider gave a detailed response to the document published by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of Faith (DDF) that was approved by Pope Francis and drew condemnations from faithful bishops around the world, including Cardinal Gerhard Müller, Cardinal Robert Sarah, and the majority of the African bishops.

READ: Cardinal Sarah: African Church gave heroic witness against ‘grave error’ of homosexual ‘blessings’

Schneider wrote that Fiducia Supplicans (FS) “serves as a significant support for ‘LGBTQ’ groups and lobbies and their ‘gay pride,’ and elevates practicing homosexuals to the level of an acceptable ‘community’ within the Church.”

“This ‘blessing’ also reinforces ‘LGBTQ communities’ in the false conviction that their sinful lifestyle is good, thus discouraging them from repenting,” the bishop from Kazakhstan continued. “Above all, it helps them to justify their militant efforts to obtain the ‘right’ to marry, adopt children, and normalize homosexual activity.”

He said that FS is “also a weapon that the Church’s enemies and ‘LGBTQ’ groups can readily use to corrupt societies and make them lenient towards sinful lifestyles” because it could be used to demand legal recognition of homosexual unions.

Schneider stated, “Secular powers, ‘LGBTQ’ lobbies, and anti-Church agendas are ultimately the driving force behind the issuance of this Declaration, whose aim is to sow the seed of deep doubt in the heart of the Church.”

“And they will surely exert significant pressure to compel Catholics to accept and promote it,” he added. “They will falsely invoke the obligation to obey Church teaching, and those priests and faithful who criticize Fiducia Supplicans, and refuse to implement it, will be accused of being unfaithful to the Pope.”

The bishop stressed that “blessing” a couple in an “irregular situation,” e.g. a same-sex “couple” or a divorced and “civilly remarried” couple, would necessarily also mean approving the sinful “lifestyle.”

“Therefore, turning a blind eye to the sin of homosexuality, i.e. engaging in homosexual acts, and going so far as blessing a person who identifies with the homosexual lifestyle, is tantamount to blessing abomination,” he wrote.

READ: Cardinal Müller: Fiducia Supplicans ‘leads to heresy,’ Catholics cannot accept it

While individuals can receive a blessing even if they are in a state of sin, the Church could not bless any “couple” in the context of a sinful relationship, Bishop Schneider explained.

“’Blessing’ a same-sex couple logically and implicitly means blessing their sinful lifestyle, and, above all, their conviction that it is inherently good and therefore morally and socially acceptable,” he stated.

“And if such unions are licit, why can ‘polyamorous’ relationships not receive a ‘simple’ and ‘spontaneous’ blessing? According to the logic of Fiducia Supplicans, a priest could also licitly bless a married man and his mistress, a priest who lives in open concubinage, a murderous and unrepentant gang member, or a dictator who starves millions of innocent people.”

The bishop also gave a warning to those clerics who authorize and support these kinds of “blessings” of “couples” living in sinful relationships.

“Those who support such blessings de facto encourage same-sex couples to pursue their sinful lifestyle, for which God will condemn them,” he stressed. “Those who authorize the ‘blessing’ of same-sex couples bear the burden and responsibility for the grave spiritual harm caused to these persons.”

“Therefore, such ‘blessings’ fit the traditional definition of scandal, for they lead others into sin.”

The bishop from Kazakhstan said that FS “is neither authentically pastoral nor authentically magisterial, as it undermines the unchanging Divine truth and the constant teaching of the Church’s Magisterium regarding the intrinsic evil of sexual acts outside a valid marriage, specifically homosexual acts.”

“This impedes the Church’s ability to convincingly reflect the true face of the Risen Christ and to radiate the beauty of His truth before the whole world,” he warned.

Schneider concluded that the heterodox Vatican document “seriously undermines the Catholic faith and morals, turning the Catholic Church, at least in practice, into a welcoming and nurturing environment for unrepentant homosexuals and adulterers who lead sinful lifestyles, instead of calling such sinners to repentance.”






Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Is The Papal Hammer About To Put The Final Nail In The Traditional Latin Mass Coffin??

 There is scuttlebutt floating around the Catholic blogosphere that faithless Rome -- that is, Bergoglio and his henchmen -- will be issuing a more encompassing anti-Christ document banishing the Traditional Latin Mass once and for all -- and everywhere!

If such an un-Catholic piece of drivel does come out of the closet, there should be absolute disobedience en masse by priests, bishops and cardinals who still have a measure of Catholicity -- and testosterone about them! 

The current occupant of the Chair of St. Peter does not have the authority to eliminate or banish the TLM!  Paul VI didn't have it, neither does Bergoglio, period!

I am going to post the infallible bull, Quo Primum, by Pope Saint Pius V, please pay attention how the saintly Pope describes the characteristics of the famous Bull and the penalties incurred if one dares not to follow the declaration!

From newadvent.org/library

Quo Primum

His Holiness Pope St. Pius V
Bull Promulgated on July 14, 1570

Pius Bishop Servant of the Servants of God For a Perpetual Memorial of the Matter.

Upon Our elevation to the Apostolic throne, We gladly turned Our mind and energies, and directed all Our thoughts, to the matter of preserving incorrupt the public worship of the Church; and We have striven, with God's help, by every means in Our power to achieve that purpose.

Whereas amongst other decrees of the holy Council of Trent, We were charged with revision and re-issue of the sacred books, to wit, the Catechism, the Missal and the Breviary; and whereas We have with God's consent published a Catechism for the instruction of the faithful and thoroughly revised the Breviary for the due performance of the Divine Office, We next, in order that the Missal and Breviary might be in perfect harmony, as is right and proper (considering that it is altogether fitting that there should be in the Church only one appropriate manner of Psalmody and one sole rite of celebrating Mass), deemed it necessary to give Our immediate attention to what still remained to be done, namely the re-editing of the Missal with the least possible delay.

We resolved accordingly to delegate this task to a select committee of scholars; and they, having at every stage of their work and with the utmost care collated the ancient codices in Our Vatican Library and reliable (original or amended) codices from elsewhere, and having also consulted the writing of ancient and approved authors who have bequeathed to us records relating to the said sacred rites, thus restored the Missal itself to the pristine form and rite of the holy Fathers. When this production had been subjected to close scrutiny and further amended We, after mature consideration, ordered that the final result be forthwith printed and published in Rome, so that all may enjoy the fruit of this labor; that priests may know what prayers to use, and what rites and ceremonies they are to observe henceforward in the celebration of Masses.

Now therefore, in order that all everywhere may adopt and observe what has been delivered to them by the Holy Roman Church, Mother and Mistress of the other churches, it shall be unlawful henceforth and forever throughout the Christian world to sing or to read Masses according to any formula other than that of this Missal published by Us; this ordinance to apply to all churches and chapels, with or without care of souls, patriarchal, collegiate, and parochial, be they secular or belonging to any religious Order, whether of men (including the military Orders) or of women, in which conventual Masses are or ought to be sung aloud in choir or read privately according to the rites and customs of the Roman Church; to apply, moreover, even if the said churches have been in any way exempted, whether by indult of the Apostolic See, by custom, by privilege, or even by oath or Apostolic confirmation, or have their rights and faculties guaranteed to them in any other way whatsoever, saving only those in which the practice of saying Mass differently was granted over 200 years ago simultaneously with the Apostolic See's institution and confirmation of the church, and those in which there has prevailed a similar custom followed continuously for a period of not less than 200 years; in which cases We in no wise rescind their prerogatives or customs aforesaid. Nevertheless, if this Missal which We have seen fit to publish be more agreeable to these last, We hereby permit them to celebrate Mass according to its rite, subject to the consent of their bishop or prelate, and of their whole Chapter, all else to the contrary notwithstanding. All other churches aforesaid are hereby denied the use of other missals, which are to be wholly and entirely rejected; and by this present Constitution, which shall have the force of law in perpetuity, We order and enjoin under pain of Our displeasure that nothing be added to Our newly published Missal, nothing omitted therefrom, and nothing whatsoever altered therein.

We specifically command each and every patriarch, administrator and all other persons of whatsoever ecclesiastical dignity, be they even Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church or possessed of any other rank or preeminence, and We order them by virtue of holy obedience to sing or to read the Mass according to the rite and manner and norm herein laid down by Us, and henceforward to discontinue and utterly discard all other rubrics and rites of other missals, howsoever ancient, which they have been accustomed to follow, and not to presume in celebrating Mass to introduce any ceremonies or recite any prayers other than those contained in this Missal.

Furthermore, by these presents and by virtue of Our Apostolic authority We give and grant in perpetuity that for the singing or reading of Mass in any church whatsoever, this Missal may be followed absolutely, without any scruple of conscience or fear of incurring any penalty, judgment or censure, and may be freely and lawfully used. Nor shall bishops, administrators, canons, chaplains, and other secular priests, or religious of whatsoever Order or by whatsoever title designated, be obliged to celebrate Mass otherwise than enjoined by Us. We likewise order and declare that no one whosoever shall be forced or coerced into altering this Missal and that this present Constitution can never be revoked or modified, but shall forever remain valid and have the force of law, notwithstanding previous constitutions or edicts of provincial or synodal councils, and notwithstanding the usage of the churches aforesaid, established by very long and even immemorial prescription, saving only usage of more than 200 years.

Consequently it is Our will, and by the same authority We decree, that one month after publication of this Our constitution and Missal, priests of the Roman Curia shall be obliged to sing or to read the Mass in accordance therewith; others south of the Alps, after three months; those who live beyond the Alps, after six months or as soon as the Missal becomes available for purchase.

Furthermore, in order that the said Missal may be preserved incorrupt and kept free from defects and errors, the penalty for non-observance in the case of all printers resident in territory directly or indirectly subject to Ourselves and the Holy Roman Church shall be forfeiture of their books and a fine of 100 gold ducats payable by that very fact to the Apostolic Treasury. In the case of those resident in other parts of the world, it shall be automatical excommunication and other penalties at Our discretion; and by Our Apostolic authority and the tenor of these presents, We also decree that they must not dare or presume either to print or to publish or to sell, or in any way to take delivery of such books without Our approval and consent, or without express permission of the Apostolic Commissary in the said parts appointed by Us for that purpose. Each of the said printers must receive from the aforementioned Commissary a standard Missal to serve as an exemplar and agree faithfully therewith, varying in no wise from the first impression printed in Rome.

But, since it would be difficult for this present Constitution to be transmitted to all parts of the world and to come to the notice of all concerned simultaneously, We direct that it be, as usual, posted and published at the doors of the Basilica of the Prince of Apostles, at those of the Apostolic Chancery, and at the end of the Campo dei Fiori; moreover, We direct that printed copies of the same, signed by a notary public and authenticated with the seal of an ecclesiastical dignitary, shall possess the same unqualified and indubitable validity everywhere and in every country that would attend the display there of Our present text. Accordingly, no one whosoever is permitted to infringe or rashly contravene this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, direction, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree and prohibition. Should any person venture to do so, let him understand that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.

Given at St. Peter's, Rome, in the year of Our Lord's Incarnation one thousand five hundred and seventy, on the fourteenth day of July in the fifth year of Our Pontificate."

End of Bull...

(Note my emphasis.)

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!!

Gene DeLalla 







Monday, June 17, 2024

Is This Take On The Bergoglio Papacy Proof Of Absolute FORMAL HERESY?! -- The DOGMATIC Council, Vatican 1, Pronouncement On The Papacy, Denied??

  There is much proof -- evidence -- of at least material heresy being perpetrated by the current occupant of the Chair of St. Peter ever since the installation of Bergoglio in 2013...

But now, since the release of the newest attack on the papacy by yet another document drawn up -- by whom, exactly? -- see here: 

Pope Francis Approves New Document Elevating Ecumenism And Synodality Above Papal Primacy... should prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Bergoglio is intent, at the very least, in compromising the papacy and making it more in line with the zeitgeist, and more "appealing" to the various false "religions" instead of Catholic Tradition and in the infallible declaration of the dogmatic Vatican 1 Council.


In the following video from returntotradition.org by Dr. Anthony Stine, Fr. Paul Kramer gives a realistic assessment of what is occurring in apostate Rome, at minute 9:15.  Please listen very carefully to what is revealed in this video and attempt to face a very tough truth regarding Bergoglio, also known as Pope Francis...

This is another example of the "ape of the church" on steroids!

As always, make up your own mind based on your knowledge of the Catholic faith -- including what is dogmatically defined regarding the papacy! -- and what presently passes for Catholicism at the highest levels in the novus ordo church...

At the end, there will be an Elect, a Remnant, not a billion-plus so-called Catholics...

Pray for strength and honor -- and for discernment!

Viva Crito Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 



















Sunday, June 16, 2024

It Is A Chilling Thing To Consider, But It Is Indisputably True: Every Year In Canada -- And The U.S. -- Babies Are Born Alive And Left To Die!

  When the Spanish conquistadores made inroads to what was to become Mexico and Central America, they found the Incas and Aztecs practicing brutal, bloody human sacrifice to their "gods"...

That finding was astonishing to those Catholic warriors and the Padres who accompanied them to the New World.  But what was even more astonishing is that those who were sacrificed were sacrificed alive, having their hearts cut and ripped from their bodies and thrown to their fiery gods!

Now, in present day Canada -- and America, still! -- that barbaric human sacrifice continues in the form of abortion (some forced!) through dismemberment or chemicals to dissolve the pre-born baby.  

What some people fail to realize is that some of those poor babies survive the attempt to snuff out their tiny lives!  But even worse, those poor souls are left to die cold and alone until they stop breathing, with many of those little creatures simply thrown in the trash!

So, who was or is more barbaric, the Aztecs, Incas or the so-called "doctors" and "nurses" who let those little ones be cast aside and die after having survived abortion??

How on earth can we expect God almighty to bless our nation when we slaughter, and treat like garbage, His gift of life to us?????

Warning: the following article is quite graphic in describing what happens when the baby survives an abortion!  Truly disgusting...

From lifesitenews.com and written by Jonathon Van Maren

Late-term babies who survive abortions in Canada are still being left to die - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

(Tell MA legislators to reject bill allowing selling of unborn children. Send a message today.)

"(LifeSiteNews) — Every year, Canadian pro-life blogger Pat Maloney faithfully publishes her research on live birth late-term abortions in Canada, obtained primarily through Freedom Of Access To Information requests. Recently, she published late-term abortion numbers from 2022-2023 (excluding Quebec), reporting: “The bad news is that late-term stillbirth abortions are up from 911 in 2021/2022 to 1,059 in 2022/2023 (148 more). And the worse news is, that these horrific abortions still happen at all. That’s a net 130 more late term abortions in 2022/2023 than in 2021/222.” 

“All of these dead children are >= 20 weeks gestation,” Maloney writes. “Seven of these children born alive after an abortion were 29+ weeks gestation. Nine of them were 25-28 weeks gestation when they died. 98 of them were 21-24 weeks gestation when they died. If someone had bothered to care for these children after their failed abortion, they could/would still be alive today.”

It is a chilling thing to consider, but it is indisputably true: Every year in Canada, babies are born alive and left to die – and not a single political party is interested in speaking out for these children, or stopping this brutality. 

During my travels across North America as a pro-life activist, I’ve had many nurses tell me of incidents where children were born alive during an attempted abortion. One Canadian nurse I met after a presentation recalled the doctor hastily tossing the tiny child into a trash can, where she heard the baby rustling weakly among the papers before he died. Former nurse and current pro-life activist Jill Stanek, whose testimony later helped to pass the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act signed into law by George W. Bush in 2003, described how children born alive after failed abortions would be left in the soiled utility room of Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn, Illinois: 

To commit induced labor abortion, a doctor or resident inserts a medication into the mother’s birth canal close to the cervix. The cervix is the opening at the bottom of the uterus that normally stays closed until a mother is about 40 weeks pregnant and ready to deliver. This medication irritates the cervix and stimulates it to open early. When this occurs, the small second or third trimester pre-term, fully formed baby falls out of the uterus, sometimes alive. By law, if an aborted baby is born alive, both birth and death certificates must be issued. Ironically, at Christ Hospital the cause of death often listed for live aborted babies is “extreme prematurity,” an acknowledgement by doctors that they have caused this death. 

 These babies can often live on for hours, Stanek revealed. Some of them, aborted healthy, live longer than others. Even in these circumstances, where it is so clear that a human being has been murdered, hospital staff attempts to normalize the experience: 

In the event that an aborted baby is born alive, she or he receives ‘comfort care,’ defined as keeping the baby warm in a blanket until s/he dies. Parents may hold the baby if they wish. If the parents do not want to hold their dying aborted baby, a staff member cares for the baby until s/he dies. If staff did not have the time or desire to hold the baby, s/he is taken [to] Christ Hospital’s new Comfort Room, which is complete with a First Foto Machine if parents want professional pictures of their aborted baby, baptismal supplies, gowns, and certificates, foot printing equipment and baby bracelets for mementos, and a rocking chair. Before the Comfort Room was established, babies were taken to the Soiled Utility Room to die. 

One experience stands out starkly in Stanek’s mind: 

  One night, a nursing co-worker was taking a Down’s syndrome baby who was aborted alive to our Soiled Utility Room because his parents did not want to hold him, and she did not have time to hold him. I could not bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone in a Soiled Utility Room, so I cradled and rocked him for the 45 minutes that he lived. He was between 21 and 22 weeks old, weighed about 1/2 pound, and was about 10 inches long. He was too weak to move very much, expending any energy he had trying to breathe. Toward the end he was so quiet that I could not tell if he was still alive. I held him up to the light to see through his chest wall whether his heart was still beating. After he was pronounced dead, we folded his little arms across his chest, wrapped him in a tiny shroud, and carried him to the hospital morgue where all of our dead patients are taken. 

These appalling stories give us a brief glimpse of the children we throw away. At Live Action, pro-life blogger Sarah Terzo recounted the testimony of a Philadelphia nurse named Linda, who frequently collected aborted babies after saline abortions were performed and they were delivered dead. In one bed, she found a tiny child, 1.5 pounds, in a woman’s hospital bed. “It looked right at me,” she recalled. “This baby had real big eyes. It looked at you like it was saying, ‘Do something – do something.’ Those haunting eyes. Oh God, I still remember them.” 

Linda found that the baby’s heartbeat was steady and called the doctor. “I called him because the baby was breathing. It was pink. It had a heartbeat. The doctor told me the baby was nonviable and to send it to the lab. I said, ‘But it’s breathing,’ and he said, ‘It’s nonviable, it won’t be breathing long – send it to the lab.” Linda couldn’t, and instead took it to the nurse’s station and put the baby in a crib. She put an open tube of oxygen next to the baby’s head. There was a nursery full of preemies, and the baby could have been saved—but she was forbidden to take the baby there, even by the other nurses. She cared for the baby for two hours, and then the child died. 

Featured Image

Jonathon Van Maren is a public speaker, writer, and pro-life activist. His commentary has been translated into more than eight languages and published widely online as well as print newspapers such as the Jewish Independent, the National Post, the Hamilton Spectator and others. He has received an award for combating anti-Semitism in print from the Jewish organization B’nai Brith. His commentary has been featured on CTV Primetime, Global News, EWTN, and the CBC as well as dozens of radio stations and news outlets in Canada and the United States.

He speaks on a wide variety of cultural topics across North America at universities, high schools, churches, and other functions. Some of these topics include abortion, pornography, the Sexual Revolution, and euthanasia. Jonathon holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in history from Simon Fraser University, and is the communications director for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform.

Jonathon’s first book, The Culture War, was released in 2016.





ABSOLUTE BOMBSHELL!! Tulsi Gabbard Releases ‘Never Before Seen’ Intelligence On U.S.-Funded Biolabs In 30 Countries!!

 Before I get to this explosive article, it should be pointed out the Tulsi Gabbard will be leaving the position of ODNI because of her want...