Saturday, January 25, 2025

Michael Knowles Compares Vatican’s Latin Mass Crackdown To Henry VIII’s Hijacking Of Catholic Churches!

 From lifesitenews.com and written by Emily Mangiaracina comes this article...

Michael Knowles compares Vatican's Latin Mass crackdown to Henry VIII’s hijacking of Catholic churches - LifeSite

Fri Jan 24, 2025 - 6:43 pm EST

"(LifeSiteNews) — Daily Wire host Michael Knowles compared the Vatican’s suppression of the Traditional Latin Mass to King Henry VIII’s Protestant hijacking of Catholic churches in England.

In an interview aired on EWTN’s The World Over with Raymond Arroyo, both the EWTN and Daily Wire host shared how they had seen or experienced the profoundly transformative impact of the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) firsthand.

Arroyo told how “many years ago,” his wife was not only not Catholic but had absorbed the standard anti-Catholic propaganda. When he took her to Mass at St. Patrick’s Cathedral, where she heard a homily by the powerful orator Cardinal John O’Connor, “it cut through,” Arroyo said, “but it didn’t seal the deal.” It was not until he took her to the TLM in Washington, D.C., that she made the decision to become Catholic.

Asked what he believes so strongly attracts young people to the TLM, even during a time when “Rome seems determined to stamp it out,” Knowles replied, “It should not be surprising that the Mass which formed, statistically, all of the saints, ever, would have some pull on people.”

He highlighted the beauty of the liturgy, noting that “so much beauty was ripped away” in the creation of the Novus Ordo Missae that overwhelmingly took its place after the Second Vatican Council. 

“Why are the young people drawn to the Traditional Latin Mass? Because we want truth. We’ve grown up in an age in which we were taught from diapers that there is no truth. Or if there is a truth, we can’t really know anything about it,” Knowles sid.

He observed, with hyperbolic emphasis, that the average age of those attending a TLM is much younger than those attending the Novus Ordo.

“It would seem to me that if you really want to bring some aggiornamento to the church, in the spirit of accompaniment, in the spirit even of Synodality, perhaps, we ought to listen to what the laity want, and what the laity want is tradition, reverence, and beauty,” Knowles told Arroyo.

“There’s something fitting about these traditional liturgies being driven underground by these very bishops. I think of Henry VIII when he goes in and destroys Canterbury cathedral and destroys such beautiful icons and steals all the land. The Protestants got all the good churches, and the Catholics went underground,” the Daily Wire host continued.

Thursday, January 23, 2025

All Senate Democrats Vote Against Bill To Criminalize Infanticide! That Includes 13 -- Count Them 13 "Catholics"!!

In an article from lifesitenews.com and written by Matt Lamb, you will see the continuation of the "great" apostasy among those who claim to be members of the Catholic Church, yet these scoundrels are -- whether they believe it or not -- automatically ex-communicated by virtue of their staunch support for the killing of the pre-born, including infanticide!!

All Senate Democrats vote against bill to criminalize infanticide - LifeSite

Thu Jan 23, 2025 - 10:27 am EST

"WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — Democratic senators once again voted against protecting babies who survive abortion from infanticide.

The Senate voted 52 to 47 on Wednesday to advance Senate Bill 6, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Act. However, 60 votes were needed to end cloture and advance the bill for a final vote. Democrats regularly oppose efforts to protect babies from infanticide, and it is arguably the official position of the party that there should be no sanctions for killing living human beings who survive abortions.

The bill would strengthen a measure passed in 2002 by providing for imprisonment of abortionists who fail to provide care to a baby who survives an abortion.

Every Republican voted for the bill, except Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN), who did not vote due to a family matter. A spokesperson told The Hill that he supported the bill. All 47 Democrats voted against the bill, with some explicitly saying they believed the bill would threaten a woman’s ability to kill her baby through abortion.

As LifeSiteNews previously reported, the law would mandate that abortion-surviving newborns be shown the “same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence” as would be given following an intended birth, and then be “immediately transported and admitted to a hospital.”

Violating physicians would face up to five years in prison, and those who go beyond willful negligence and commit an “overt act” to kill the newborn would be punished under the existing federal murder statute.

Prior to the vote, Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune called on Democrats to support the bill and also criticized the “supposed right to kill unborn babies.”

“This shouldn’t be a controversial bill,” Sen. Thune said. “We should all be able to agree that a baby born alive after an attempted abortion must be protected.” He said he expected Senate Democrats would oppose the bill.

“Why are they going to vote like that?” he asked. He said, “most Democrats” would oppose infanticide, though the “moral line… appears to be slipping.”

He said that recognizing the “humanity” of a baby who survives an abortion will “inadvertently” lead Democrats to recognize “the humanity of the unborn child,” calling them “afraid” to do so.

“Once you recognize the humanity of the newly born baby, it gets a little harder that that child wasn’t human just a few minutes ago simply because he or she wasn’t yet born,” Thune said.

He added, “there’s nothing more important to Democrats than abortion.”

Democrats indeed did cite abortion in their defense of why they voted against protecting born, breathing human beings from infanticide.

Sen. Durbin of Illinois claimed that the bill could “make it harder for women to access” abortion.

Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania also cited Roe v. Wade in his opposition.

“I’ve always stood on the side of Roe and a woman’s right to make her own health care choices,” Fetterman wrote on X (formerly Twitter), euphemistically referring to the murder of children. “It’s absurd to mandate criminalization because of those choices.”

“Any bill that does so, including the Born-Alive Survivors Protection Act, is a NO from me,” he added.

The Democratic Party’s official position, as detailed by its leaders, is that abortion should be available through all nine months of pregnancy with virtually no restrictions. Democratic governors, in addition to Democratic senators, have voiced their opposition to strong legal protections for babies who survive abortion.

Failed 2024 Democratic Party vice presidential nominee and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, for example, signed legislation in Minnesota to lower the care requirement for babies who survive abortions.

Former Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam also detailed his views on what the law should say and what current law is, based on his experience as a doctor.

“So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen: The infant would be delivered; the infant would be kept comfortable,” Northam said in January 2019, responding to an extreme bill in Virginia to legalize abortions through the moment of birth.

He then said, “the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desire,” implying that the baby would not be resuscitated if the family wanted the baby to die.

“[A]nd then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,” he said."'

End of article...

I thought you might want to know who these baby-killing apostates are...

Pray for their conversion, lest they spend eternity separated from God in hell...

Pray too for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 



 Maria Cantwell


 Catherine Cortez Masto


 Dick Durbin


 Ruben Gallego


 Kirsten Gillibrand


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Tim Kaine


 Mark Kelly


 Ben Ray Luján


 Ed Markey


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Patty Murray


 Alex Padilla


 Jack Reed


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Peter Welch


 










Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Any Attempt To “Abolish” The Traditional Mass Would Be A “Diabolical Project” That “Seeks To Break With The Church Of Christ,” Said Cardinal Robert Sarah

 I must repeat the title of my article: Any Attempt To “Abolish” The Traditional Mass Would Be A “Diabolical Project” That “Seeks To Break With The Church Of Christ,” Said Cardinal Robert Sarah...

(My emphasis.)

Break with the Church of Christ?

What exactly does that mean?  Or, should I say, how did the good Cardinal mean that?

Literally? 

Figuratively? 

If literally, then he, for all practical purposes, has labeled such a diabolical move -- if it does take place -- as a massive apostasy from the Catholic Church and the Mass of the ages!

(Luther's Protestant Revolt of the 16th century was exactly that.)

Read what he said for yourself...  From lifesitenews.com and written by Michael Haynes, Snr. Vatican Correspondent

Cardinal Sarah: Plans to ‘abolish’ Latin Mass would be ‘diabolical’ - LifeSite

Wed Jan 22, 2025 - 8:42 am EST

MILAN (LifeSiteNews) — Any attempt to “abolish” the traditional Mass would be a “diabolical project” that “seeks to break with the Church of Christ,” said Cardinal Robert Sarah this week.

“In the history of the liturgy there is growth and progress, but not rupture,” noted Sarah at an event Monday.

Drawing from Pope Benedict XVI’s now famous remark, Sarah made it his own, stating that “what was holy for previous generations remains holy and great for us, and cannot suddenly be forbidden or even judged harmful. It is good for all of us to preserve the riches that have grown in the faith and prayer of the Church and to give them their rightful place.”

Sarah – who served as prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (CDW) from 2014-2021 – expanded his harsh criticism of any attempt to abolish the traditional Mass (Latin Mass) by warning that it would be a rejection of Church history.

He stated:

Hence the plan to definitively abolish the traditional Tridentine Mass, a rite that dates back to St. Gregory the Great, a liturgy that is 1,600 years old, a Mass celebrated by so many saints: St. Padre Pio, St. Philip Neri, St. John Mary Vianney: the Curé of Ars, St Francis. de Sales, St. Josemaria Escrivá, etc. And all the way back to Pope Gregory the Great (590-604) and even to Pope Damasus (366-384).

This project, if it is true, seems to me to be an insult to the history of the Church and to Sacred Tradition, a diabolical project that seeks to break with the Church of Christ, the apostles and the saints.

 The cardinal’s comments came at a book launch held in Milan by Italian Catholic media outlet La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana. Addressing the conference, Sarah did not limit himself to the theme of his book, Does God exist?, but dealt with a wide-ranging field of subjects relating to the Catholic Church and spirituality.

Drawing once more from Benedict XVI, Sarah quoted the late German pope, saying, “the First Vatican Council did not define the Pope as an absolute monarch but, on the contrary, as the guarantor of obedience to the word handed down: his authority is linked to the tradition of the faith: this is also true in the area of the liturgy.”

“Even the Pope,” said Sarah, “can only be a humble servant of its proper development and of its constant integrity and identity … The Pope’s authority is not unlimited; it is at the service of Sacred Tradition.”

A few days prior, at a clergy conference in Rome held last week, Sarah expressed similar themes and alluded to the growth of attendance at the traditional liturgy:

Despite intransigent clerical attitudes in opposition to the venerable Latin-Gregorian liturgy, attitudes typical of the clericalism that Pope Francis has repeatedly denounced, a new generation of young people has emerged in the heart of the Church. This generation is one of young families, who demonstrate that this liturgy has a future because it has a past, a history of holiness and beauty that cannot be erased or abolished overnight.

Sarah will turn 80 this June, and as such will age out of voting in a papal conclave.

Though not naming it directly, Sarah’s comments appeared to be aimed at the restrictions ushered in by Pope Francis via his 2021 motu proprio Traditionis Custodes. Sarah is a public champion of the traditional Mass, offering it himself, and voiced strong criticism of the Pope’s restrictions when they emerged.

Assisted by current Dicastery for Divine Worship Prefect Cardinal Arthur Roche, such restrictions have only increased and rumors swirled last summer that a new, even more restrictive document, would emerge to further ban the traditional Mass.

READ: Pope Francis had new Latin Mass restrictions on his desk but didn’t sign document: report

Such an eventuality did not take place, following a large outpouring of public support from leading individuals in the ecclesial but also secular sphere.

However, in the past few days, Pope Francis issued fresh attacks against devotees of the Latin Mass in a memoir published January 14.

Repeating his regular denigration of supposed “rigidity” in young Catholics, Francis said that:

This rigidity is often accompanied by elegant and costly tailoring, lace, fancy trimmings, rochets. Not a taste for tradition but clerical ostentation, which then is none other than an ecclesiastic version of individualism. Not a return to the sacred but to quite the opposite, to sectarian worldliness.

READ: Pope Francis accuses young Catholic priests who like the Latin Mass of ‘mental imbalance’

He further accused Catholics who attend the traditional liturgy of the Church of having a “mental imbalance, emotional deviation, behavioral difficulties, a personal problem that may be exploited.”

Responding to the Pope’s remarks, former Tyler, Texas, ordinary Bishop Joseph Strickland urged that “true shepherds must speak against this attack, and it is an attack … many from the very top of the Church are seeking to eliminate the traditional Latin Mass.”


Sarah has long advocated for the position of Benedict XVI, namely to have the Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo as “mutually enriching” for one another. Decrying often the “liturgical war” of recent decades, he stated in 2019 that the Second Vatican Council “did not wish to break with the liturgical forms inherited from Tradition, but, on the contrary, to better enter and participate more fully in them.”

While speaking to the clergy conference in Rome last week, Sarah renewed that message, stating:

I want to make an appeal for that hermeneutic of reform in continuity spoken of by Pope Benedict XVI (Address, 22 December 2005).

This is a personal opinion, but it seems to me that the reformed liturgical books desperately need that continuity with the liturgical tradition that the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council sought to reform if they are to be true, beautiful, and good, and thereby do the best they can for the sanctification and edification of God’s Holy People. Others may disagree. But in my reading of the Council, this is what it intended: reform in continuity and not rupture with the past.

Notwithstanding the restrictions on the Latin Mass currently emerging from the Vatican – labelled a “persecution” by Cardinal Raymond Burke – traditional communities are thriving. Arguably even bolstered by Traditionis Custodes, Latin Mass groups have seen year-on-year records of new admissions to their seminaries."

End of very revealing article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 











Tuesday, January 21, 2025

As We Know, Dark Forces -- Very Dark Forces! I.E., The Devil Are Aligned Against President Trump. Fr. Ripperger (An Exorcist) Presents A Prayer To Consecrate Him To The Immaculate Heart Of Mary!

 Just as our good God and Lord saved President Trump from death on at least two occasions, Fr. Ripperger -- a well-known exorcist -- is urging us to continue to pray for the President to consecrate him to the Immaculate Heart of Mary!

This is a very good thing, to say the least!

I would add that we pray for his conversion to the Catholic faith every day of the week, month and year, so that he will embrace the fullness of the saving Ark, the Church, founded by Our Lord on the Rock of St. Peter, as well as the 100 percent adherence to the Natural Law.

Whether one likes, dislikes, or even hates the President -- (not one single practicing Catholic has any business hating President Trump, or anyone for that matter) -- we must pray that Our Lord will use him as an instrument to broker peace in this war-torn world!  That one act alone will set the clock back on the threat of a nuclear conflagration that the lunatic globalists are chomping at the bit to start!  

Here is the prayer that Fr. Ripperger issued and sent to lifesitenews.com, and written by Antonino Cambria

Fr. Ripperger issues urgent prayer for Donald Trump as he begins 2nd term - LifeSite

Mon Jan 20, 2025 - 5:14 pm EST

(LifeSiteNews) — Well-known exorcist Father Chad Ripperger sent LifeSiteNews co-founder John-Henry Westen a prayer to the Blessed Virgin Mary for the intention of consecrating President Donald Trump to her Immaculate Heart.

As Trump begins his historic second term in office today, Ripperger is urging the faithful to say this prayer for Trump’s wisdom and guidance. The exorcist told Westen that there are dark forces working to derail any good the president might accomplish over the next four years, and he urgently needs our prayers.  

Below is the prayer sent by Fr. Ripperger:

Immaculate Mary, patroness of the United States of America. Queen of Heaven and earth, beneath whose sway are subject all things that are lower than God, sorrowful and mindful of our own sinfulness and the sins of our nation, we come to thee our refuge and hope, knowing that our country cannot be saved by our own works, and mindful of how much our nation has departed from the ways of thy Son, we humbly ask that thou wouldst turn thine eyes upon our country to bring about its conversion.  

We consecrate to thee all of those governing our Republic, so that what is spiritually and morally best for the citizens of our nation may be accomplished, and that they would govern according to the spiritual and moral principles which will bring our nation into conformity with the teachings of thy Son. Bind any forces, spiritual or human, that would seek to inflict harm or evil on our country, or those who do good for our nation by their governance.  

Give grace to the citizens of this land, so that they may merit leaders who will govern according to the Sacred Heart of thy Son, that His glory may be made manifest, lest we be given the leaders we deserve. Trusting in the providential care of God the Father and thy maternal care, we have perfect confidence that thou wilt take care of us and will not leave us forsaken.  

O Mary Immaculate, pray for us."

End of wonderful article!!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 

 









Monday, January 20, 2025

Pope Francis Defends Inviting Transgender Groups To Vatican: ‘Proximity To Everybody’. But No Call To Conversion And Amending One's Sinful Life??

 Does our good God really love us as we are without converting and amending our lives?

If that is the case, then we have been deceived!

That would indicate that a soul contaminated with filth and mortal sin can enter the Heavenly Beatitude, isn't that the logical conclusion?

What is Bergoglio thinking??

How can he justify his error, heresy, scandal and confusion??

With verbal gymnastics? 

With post-Vatican II doubletalk that makes even defined dogmas meaningless.

It seems so with almost every statement and written word that emanates from the Chair of St. Peter these days...

Here is the latest bizarre craziness from Francis: Pope Francis defends inviting transgender groups to Vatican: 'Proximity to everybody' - LifeSite

And written by Michael Haynes, Snr. Vatican CorrespondentMon Jan 20, 2025 - 11:36 am EST

"VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Pope Francis has defended his regular welcoming of transgender groups at the Vatican, saying that “proximity” is key for the Church.

“Proximity! That’s the word. Proximity to everybody. Everyone.” This was the answer of Pope Francis when asked on Italy’s Che Tempo Che Fa program January 19 about the warm welcome he has given to groups of transgenders and homosexuals at the Vatican.

Such events have become a regular occurrence, and range in kind from the Pope greeting them at the end of his weekly general audience (at which they are given special seating) to welcoming dissident groups such as New Ways Ministry in private audience.

“But I want to remember this,” added Francis. “The worst sins, they are the ones that have more ‘angelicity.’ Sins of the flesh have less ‘angelicity.’ Sins of gluttony, sexual sins have less ‘angelicity.’”

He added:

Instead, not taking care of father and mother, lies, cheating … These have so much “angelicity.”

We need to be respectful and not put everything in [terms of] the sins of the flesh. It disgusts me when some people in confession always look for that.

The sins of the flesh have less “angelicity,” but the others, don’t forget. It is so bad not to take care of father and mother, so bad. They have more “angelicity.” This is the key to understanding a grave sin.

These lines closely resemble those used by the Pontiff in his recently released memoir Hope, in which he decried the outcry from Catholics over his allowing divorced and “re-married” to receive Holy Communion.

Writing in Hope, Francis decried “resistance” to Amoris Laetitia (which contained the controversial line about Holy Communion) as based on “inadequate knowledge or some form of hypocrisy.”

He described the document as simply opening “the doors for new pastoral challenges in regard to the family and that note on the possibility of divorced people having access to the sacraments.”

“Sexual sins,” he said, “tend to cause more of an outcry from some people. But they are really not the most serious. They are human sins, of the flesh.”

READ: What motivates Pope Francis’ attempts to normalize homosexual relationships?

The Pope’s practicing of “proximity” has included a number of audiences and meetings with individuals actively living as a member of the opposite sex, or key LGBT activists. Participants of these encounters recount how meeting the Pope re-enforced them, rather than awakening them to their biological reality.

One woman, who lives as a man, commented recently that her meeting confirmed her in her “transgender identity.”

The Catholic Church calls all souls to the practice of chastity, but particular care is given to those suffering with same-sex attraction to offer the assistance needed but also to ensure that the fullness of Catholic morality is not compromised in this endeavor.

Teaching found re-iterated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church notes that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered” and “contrary to the natural law.” The catechism is very clear that homosexual activity can never be approved, and repeats that “[h]omosexual persons are called to chastity.”

Under the leadership of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in 1986, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) issued a document instructing bishops on the pastoral care of homosexual persons. The CDF admonished bishops to ensure they, and any “pastoral programme” in the diocese are “clearly stating that homosexual activity is immoral.”

Such an authentic pastoral approach would “assist homosexual persons at all levels of the spiritual life: through the sacraments, and in particular through the frequent and sincere use of the sacrament of Reconciliation, through prayer, witness, counsel and individual care,” stated the CDF.

The instruction adds:

But we wish to make it clear that departure from the Church’s teaching, or silence about it, in an effort to provide pastoral care is neither caring nor pastoral. Only what is true can ultimately be pastoral. The neglect of the Church’s position prevents homosexual men and women from receiving the care they need and deserve.

Therefore special concern and pastoral attention should be directed toward those who have this condition, lest they be led to believe that the living out of this orientation in homosexual activity is a morally acceptable option. It is not.

 The CDF’s 1975 documentPersona Humana, also noted that “[t]here can be no true promotion of man’s dignity unless the essential order of his nature is respected.”

End of article...

Pray for the conversion of Bergoglio and for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 




Can This Be Real?? Joseph Maria Bonnemain, Bishop of Chur, Says No Excommunication For...Giving Eucharist To Dogs!!!!

WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING! BEWARE, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONTAINS VERY DISTURBING INFORMATION THAT JUST MAY MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL! I as...