WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
BEWARE, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONTAINS VERY DISTURBING INFORMATION THAT JUST MAY MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL!
I ask again: can this be real??
Please watch the short video and determine what or whom we are really dealing with. In any event, I can tell you that these synodal church "bishops" are not Catholic, period!
Remember, there will be an Elect, a Remnant, not 1.5 billion "Catholics" going to Heaven...
What will be the actual numbers? Only Our Lord knows...
Pray!
From lifesitenews.com, and written by Gaetano Masciullo Tue Apr 28, 2026 - 11:06 am EDT: Swiss bishop says no excommunication for parishioners who gave Eucharist to dogs - LifeSite
"(LifeSiteNews) — A Swiss Catholic diocese has ruled that three Catholics who shared consecrated hosts with their dogs did not incur excommunication because they lacked sacrilegious intent.
On April 17, the Diocese of Chur, Switzerland, announced the conclusion of an investigation into an incident that occurred on October 4, 2025, at Guthirt (“Good Shepherd”) Parish in Zurich, where three individuals gave portions of the Blessed Eucharist to their dogs during a Mass held in conjunction with an animal blessing. Joseph Maria Bonnemain, Bishop of Chur, determined that the individuals did not act with sacrilegious intent and therefore did not commit a canonical crime warranting excommunication.
“The findings clearly showed that the three individuals did not act with sacrilegious intent. Consequently, these individuals cannot be accused of sacrilege, as they lacked this sacrilegious intent,” the statement said.
READ: Pope Leo is planning to excommunicate the SSPX: report
According to the diocesan statement, “Due to bad weather forecasts, [an animal] blessing” scheduled for October 4, 2025, “was moved to the church and combined with a Eucharistic celebration.” Then, during that Mass, “three people shared parts of their hosts with their dogs.”
Bonnemain initiated an investigation after learning of the episode. The diocesan inquiry focused on whether the actions met the criteria for sacrilege under canon law, particularly whether the individuals involved acted with the necessary intent.
According to the Code of Canon Law, “One who throws away the consecrated species or, for a sacrilegious purpose, takes them away or keeps them, incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See” (1382 § 1).
A latae sententiae excommunication means that the penalty is incurred automatically, by the very act itself, without any formal sentence of condemnation. Such a penalty is “reserved to the Apostolic See” when only the Pope can lift it, not local bishops.
According to the diocese, the central question in this case was whether the conduct of the individuals constituted such a delict in the absence of explicit sacrilegious intent.
Moreover, the diocese appeared skeptical and stated that the “information received was based, among other things, on hearsay. Consequently, it had become necessary to properly clarify and record the circumstances, the course of events, which persons were involved, and their intentions.”
The statement, however, suggests that it was far more than mere hearsay, and that the blasphemous event did in fact take place.
According to a report offered by The Pillar, canon law literature generally holds that this law would be violated only in three cases: namely, the deliberate discarding or scattering of the consecrated species in an inappropriate manner, the removal of the Eucharist from the tabernacle for profane purposes, and the retention of the Eucharist for similar ends. The diocesan conclusion was that none of these conditions applied in a strict canonical sense because the subjective element of intent was not present.
At the same time, the diocese described the incident as “most regrettable.” It reported also that Bonnemain “has arranged a closed meeting with the entire parish team to deepen Pope Francis’ doctrinal exhortation on the Eucharist Desiderio Desideravi.”
Catholic news portal Swiss-Cath appears skeptical in its report on the outcome of the diocesan investigation. “Bishop Bonnemain has commissioned his peer and confidant Josef Annen, the former Vicar General for Zurich and Glarus, to investigate. Whether he was able to carry out his work with the necessary independence and impartiality remains questionable,” it reads. “He was probably given the slogan ‘Keep the ball flat’ by the senior shepherd of Chur.”
“Keep the ball flat” is a Swiss‑German expression used to advise someone not to cause trouble.
READ: Cdl. Marx’s same-sex ‘blessing’ guide made ‘in consultation with Rome,’ heterodox theologian claims
According to Swiss-Cath, the outcome of the diocesan investigation does not address the central question: whether, and in what way – even implicitly – parish administrators may have given signals that facilitated the abuse of the hosts. A simple denial would have dispelled any suspicion, but Bonnemain did not provide one.
Furthermore, the diocese’s reconstruction of the events of October 4, 2025, appears contradictory. On the one hand, it claims that an animal blessing was combined with the Mass due to bad weather, yet the original flyer had stated from the outset of a single celebration. Moreover, this version does not match the pastor’s own statement, according to which the Mass was added at the last minute to accommodate regular churchgoers.
Thus, the diocese has not truly clarified either the responsibilities or the circumstances of what happened. Overall, Swiss-Cath writes, the whole affair “gives the impression of being merely a token gesture.”'
End of extremely disturbing article...
Pray for strength and honor!
Viva Cristo Rey! Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun, and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...
St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...
St. Joseph, pray for us!!
Gene DeLalla
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment.