Sunday, October 5, 2025

Pope Leo Offers Another Jibe At Trump Over Deportations — Urges Catholics To Embrace Open Borders Under ‘New Missionary Age’!!

 The "new missionary age," for what exactly?

Is it to truly evangelize for the salvation of souls or is this just another post-Vatican II version of doubletalk used to confuse or conflate, let's say, abortion -- that dastardly sin that cries to Heaven for vengeance -- to, let's say "climate change," or, let's say, the treatment of illegal aliens, et al...

The "seamless garment" raising its ugly head! 

When will we get back to authentic Church teachings that have guided the church for the last 2,000 years??

When????

Leo has shown his hand once again, by criticizing our President Trump because he is attempting to rid the country of those illegal aliens who have smashed the lives of so many Americans, up to and including killing them -- whether by direct physical attack or by the smuggling of deadly drugs that have killed an estimated 100,000 to 150,000 citizens each and every year since the treasonous Marxist Biden regime opened the floodgates of the border! 

Leo conveniently ignores the right of a sovereign country to protect its borders and enforce federal immigration laws designed to protect us from harm and safeguard our hard-won freedoms and livelihoods...

So here is yet another jab at the President: the story comes from thegatewaypundit.com and written  Pope Leo Offers Another Jibe at Trump Over Deportations — Urges Catholics to Embrace Open Borders Under ‘New Missionary Age’ | The Gateway Pundit | by Ben Kew

"Pope Leo XIV continues to make thinly veiled jibes against the Trump administration’s stance against illegal immigration.

Speaking in front of thousands of pilgrims at St. Peter’s Square on Sunday, Leo warned that migrants must not be treated with “the coldness of indifference or the stigma of discrimination.”

Without singling out any country in particular, Leo said that Catholics should “open our arms and hearts to them, welcoming them as brothers and sisters, and being for them a presence of consolation and hope.”

Leo explained that the church was living through a “new missionary age” that tasked its members with providing “hospitality and welcome, compassion and solidarity” to migrants coming to the West.

“In the communities of ancient Christian tradition, such as those of the West, the presence of many brothers and sisters from the world’s South should be welcomed as an opportunity, through an exchange that renews the face of the Church,” he said, according to Reuters.

He did not differentiate between legal and illegal migration, nor make any reference to the countless numbers of migrants who have already migrated to the West, many of whom do not share the Christian faith.

Leo’s remarks come days after he appeared to criticize the Trump administration’s pro-life position in the context of the policy of mass deportation.

“Someone who says I’m against abortion but says I’m in favor of the death penalty is not really pro-life,” he explained.

”So someone who says, I’m against abortion, but I’m in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States, I don’t know if that’s pro-life.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt rejected his suggestions.

“I would reject that there is inhumane treatment of illegal immigrants in the United States under this administration,” she responded.

“There was, however, significant, inhumane treatment of illegal immigrants in the previous administration as they were being trafficked and raped and beaten, in many cases killed over our United States southern border.”

The pontiff, who was elected back in May following the passing of his left-wing predecessor Pope Francis, has been flexing his liberal credentials in other ways.

Just this week, he blessed a block of ice as part of a ritual against so-called climate change, accusing Trump and the GOP of “ridiculing those who speak of global warming.”

Photo of author
Ben Kew is a writer and editor. Originally from the UK, he moved to the U.S. to cover Congress for Breitbart News and has since gone on to editorial roles at Human Events, Townhall Media, and Americano Media. He has also written for The Epoch Times, The Western Journal, and The Spectator.

You can email Ben Kew here, and read more of Ben Kew's articles here.

End of article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey! Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla














Is This Francis II? Top Catholic Scholar: Pope Leo Is Following Francis’ Ambiguity On Abortion! Remember, Actions -- Or Lack Thereof -- Speak Louder Than Words...

 With all the talk of "fraternity," "liberty," "equality," "accompaniment," "dialogue," "inclusion," ad nauseum, emanating from the mouths of the hierarchs, one fact remains: if a child is slaughtered in the womb, or at the point of birth, there can be none of the above for the poor baby destroyed for the convenience of the "mother" and "father" -- or regardless of the reason -- is never, ever justified

It is truly a crime against humanity!  

It is murder!

It is the destruction of the precious gift of life that Our Blessed Lord and Creator allow us, as co-creators with Him, to bring new life into the world. 

 We saw this ambiguity under Bergoglio, saying one thing then doing the opposite, and now, we see the same madness under Leo -- using the horror of the "seamless garment" heresy first initiated by the heretic/pervert "cardinal" Bernardin of the Marxist controlled, gang-war-ridden, once-great City of Chicago...

I'll post an interview of Professor John Rist and posted on lifesitenews.com and written by Maike Hickson Thu Oct 2, 2025 - 4:26 pm EDT (the wife of my Vietnam veteran brother, Dr. Robert Hickson) Top Catholic scholar: Pope Leo is following Francis' ambiguity on abortion - LifeSite

Draw your own conclusions -- based, not on hearsay, but on the words, actions or omissions of the current occupant of the Chair of St. Peter...

One more thing, you will notice how the "seamless garment" argument is used to conflate the death penalty with the crime of abortion, placing them on an equal plane.  

They are not.  

The church has always acknowledged the right of the state to impose the ultimate penalty on those monsters who deprived the life of their victims.  The murder of the pre-born baby, on the other hand, has been condemned by the Church, is a crime that cries to Heaven for vengeance and is the result of the moral and spiritual rot that has infected mankind since Cain killed his brother Abel.

Leo claims -- as did Bergoglio -- that we who know that the death penalty can be used to take the life of convicted criminal, are not pro-life!

Let that sink in...

"(LifeSiteNews) — Renowned Catholic professor John Rist shows that Pope Leo XIV, in his recent interview comments regarding the Durbin case, is “following in Bergoglio’s footsteps.” He even calls Pope Leo’s comments “shameful.”

The American Pope, in September 30 comments to journalists, declined to criticize the fact that Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago had the intention of awarding Senator Dick Durbin even though this politician is a strong supporter of abortion. On the contrary, the Pope insisted that one has to look at a politician’s entire work and career, adding that there are other important issues he believes are contrary to life, such as anti-immigration sentiment and the death penalty.

According to Rist, “when Cupich proposed to honor Senator Durbin, he remained silent while the dispute raged, then intervened in an exactly Bergoglian manner: we should put abortion in its context; there are other serious life issues. Thus he both finessed the seriousness of the deaths of millions of the unborn and failed to recognize that abortion is at the heart of the left-liberal, anti-Christian agenda.”

As he also points out, there is a long-standing and very consequential reluctance of Catholic bishops to clearly and courageously defend the Church’s stance against abortion.

Professor Rist is a world-renowned scholar of St. Augustine and the Church Fathers and had been outspoken against the teachings coming out of Rome under Pope Francis that are contrary to the Church’s tradition and doctrine. Rist was part of a group of scholars who accused Pope Francis of heresy. Subsequently he was barred from entering any pontifical university in Rome.

READ: Pro-abortion Sen. Durbin says he’s ‘overwhelmed’ by Pope Leo’s apparent defense of his award

Please see below the full interview with Professor John Rist:

LifeSite: Why are Pope Leo XIV’s comments on the Cupich proposal to award the pro-abortion Sen. Durbin so particularly important?

Prof. Rist: In order to evaluate Pope Leo’s shameful comments on Cupich’s proposed award to Senator Durbin, it is necessary to see the problem of abortion in context. The context is that the “right” to abortion is at the very heart of the left-liberal agenda: many of their other positions flow directly from it and it must therefore be recognized as posing a fundamental problem for Catholic ethics, indeed for any serious account of justice. That this question is so central is well shown by an event I learned of many years ago in Toronto, when a very well-known American public intellectual, speaking to a group of female graduate students, told them how lucky they were to be able to study philosophy at an advanced level. “And why can you do this?” she asked. “Because you can always get an abortion when you need it.”

Yes, indeed. For many years much of the Catholic episcopate has been very ambiguous about abortion. Verbally, of course, they have always condemned it, but when it comes to action, the matter is very different. Thus when I was involved in the pro-life movement in Canada in the late sixties and early seventies, the episcopal unwillingness to back up words with actions provoked the publication by the University of Toronto Press of an excellent book entitled Catholics against the Church: A History of the Pro-Life Movement in Canada. At that time the cardinal-archbishop of Toronto regularly forbade the display of pro-life literature in the churches of his diocese.

Why have Catholic bishops (and now popes) often been so unwilling to face the abortion problem head-on?

Precisely because they know that to attack abortion is to attack left-liberalism at its heart, and that those who do that will not only incur the wrath of the Western press and Western elites more generally, but that they will regularly be labeled bigots and fascists (as I have been myself). The episcopate – impelled by fear – has too often been unwilling to face the challenge that outright opposition to abortion invites them to face.

How did Pope Francis deal with the abortion problem?

Bergoglio was always ambiguous about abortion (as about so much else). He would condemn it as a dreadful crime and at the same time cozy up to the most active abortionists (not least, but not only, Emma Bonino, Italy’s foremost pro-abortion politician and, as a doctor, a regular committer of abortion herself). Bergoglio regularly practiced this ambiguity, and now Leo has followed him – again by claiming that abortion is only one of many moral issues and should not be overestimated.

So is Pope Leo following Pope Francis’s lead on the topic of abortion?

Yes, it seems that he is indeed following in Bergoglio’s footsteps, doubtless understanding that this is one of the things he was elected to do. So he recently had a cozy little chat with a Dominican sister, apparently without any suggestion that her pro-abortion views are wholly at odds with Catholic morality. Then when Cupich proposed to honor Senator Durbin, he remained silent while the dispute raged, then intervened in an exactly Bergoglian manner: we should put abortion in its context; there are other serious life issues. Thus he both finessed the seriousness of the deaths of millions of the unborn and failed to recognize that abortion is at the heart of the left-liberal, anti-Christian agenda.

What are we to conclude from Pope Leo’s recent actions?

That like Bergoglio he does not want to face moral reality. It seems that he cannot distinguish between the execution of some sadistic torturer and the convenience-killings of millions of unborn children, even, as Durbin wished, their killing a few hours before they would be naturally born. In sum, Leo has shown himself unwilling to recognize the particular moral iniquity of advocating the deliberate killing of innocents.

How do Pope Leo’s comments on the Cupich affair affect pro-lifers and the Church more widely?

Leo’s comments are a sharp kick in the groin aimed at all those hard-working pro-lifers who for decades – often facing insult and even imprisonment – have fought for the unborn. On abortion he has resorted to Bergoglio-speak and acted in a truly Bergoglian spirit. We might all ask why we have to put up with this. The answer is that when we saw Bergoglio himself in action, we refused to move against him, thus allowing his successor to begin to normalize his legacy.

What is your last word, from a strictly personal point of view?

If this piece is published, I shall probably once more be labeled a fascist; I am really looking forward to that!"

Featured Image

Dr. Maike Hickson was born and raised in Germany. She holds a PhD from the University of Hannover, Germany, after having written in Switzerland her doctoral dissertation on the history of Swiss intellectuals before and during World War II. She now lives in the U.S. and is the widow of Dr. Robert Hickson, with whom she was blessed with two beautiful children.

Dr. Hickson published in 2014 a Festschrift, a collection of some thirty essays written by thoughtful authors in honor of her husband upon his 70th birthday, which is entitled A Catholic Witness in Our Time.

Hickson has closely followed the papacy of Pope Francis and the developments in the Catholic Church in Germany, and she has been writing articles on religion and politics for U.S. and European publications and websites such as LifeSiteNews, OnePeterFive, The Wanderer, Rorate Caeli, Catholicism.org, Catholic Family News, Christian Order, Notizie Pro-Vita, Corrispondenza Romana, Katholisches.info, Der Dreizehnte,  Zeit-Fragen, and Westfalen-Blatt.

End of article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 












 


Saturday, October 4, 2025

Who REALLY Killed Charlie Kirk??

 As you know, there have been "hundreds" of articles and stories about the assassination of Mr. Charlie Kirk in September last...

We have all been led to believe that it was a "lone gunman" that took the life of the young crusader.

The killer supposedly used a 30.06 rifle and hit Mr. Kirk in the neck, killing him almost instantly, if not instantly.

But there are problems with that narrative...

First, a 30.06 slug would have left a massive exit wound after it hit Charlie's neck.  As I have read, there was no exit wound!

How can that be?

It can't be.

Second, there is now information that "somehow" is not being followed through, it's as if there was a plot by others to take out Mr. Kirk and use the 22-year-old "transgender" lunatic as a patsy.  (Remember Lee H. Oswald?)  That the caliber used in the kill-shot was a small caliber and fired from his left or from behind...

Conspiracy?

Very possible...

Now comes this article from Chuck Baldwin that gives a very different viewpoint of the narrative fed to the American people -- and the world!

I'll post his missive, and you can make up your mind, but whatever you do, know that there are plenty examples of assassins being used as a brainwashed, drugged controlled "Manchurian Candidate" doing the work of the demonic among us.

From Columns > “Israel Did It; Prove Me Wrong”

“Israel Did It; Prove Me Wrong” 

"The title of this column is the same as the title of a video analysis of the murder of Charlie Kirk on the Macintosh Team YouTube channel. Here is a transcription of that video along with my comments.

Everybody wants to know: Did Israel kill Charlie Kirk?

“No, no, no, don't be ridiculous. A lone gunman did it.”

Always a lone gunman.

“A young man, unstable, angry, looking for attention. His own father turned him in; case closed.”

That's the script. That's the headline. That's the truth we're all supposed to swallow. Neat, tidy, packaged, ready to go.

But here's the problem: Neat and tidy almost never means true. Every time the story is wrapped up this quickly, you should start sniffing for smoke.

And sure enough, the moment Kirk's body was cold, the whispers began: “Israel. Could Israel have had a hand in this?”

“Absurd,” they said. “Insane,” they said. “Stupid.”

Netanyahu himself had to go on live television to shout it down. And if you saw that interview, you know exactly what I'm talking about. He wasn't calm. He wasn't confident. He was flustered, defensive, repeating himself like a man who knows the rumor cuts too close to the bone.

And here's the kicker: On paper, it makes no sense.

Charlie Kirk was Israel's guy. He spent years worshiping at their altar. He told students, “Palestinians don't exist.” He smeared critics as radicals, spread their propaganda, flew on their trips, cashed their donors' checks. He said Israel was America's best friend over and over. He was loyal.

But loyalty in this game doesn't mean forever. Loyalty means obedience. And the second you step out of line, you're not a loyal ally anymore. You're a liability.

And Charlie Kirk—America's loudest campus Zionist—made the fatal mistake of asking questions. Epstein? Mossad? October 7th? Gaza? He started inviting Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly on stage. He started letting Dave Smith call Gaza what it really is: the slaughter of a captive people. And that was it. The alarms went off. Donors flipped. Zionist bloggers.

And now watch what happens: The media points left; the right points back. Social media collapses into chaos. Everyone's screaming at everyone else: “Deep State. MAGA. Antifa. CIA.” No one agrees. No one unites. No one looks at the one country that always benefits from division: Israel.

Because while Americans lose their minds over Charlie Kirk, Israel is still in Gaza, still bombing, still starving children, still bulldozing homes. Business as usual.

That's the genius of it. They don't even have to deny it convincingly. Netanyahu just shrugs and says, “Stupid. Absurd.” And that's enough. Because the real trick isn't to prove innocence. It's to stir the pot so no one cares. And boy, did it work.

So, let's ask the old Latin question: Cui bono? Who benefits? Not the shooter. Not his father. Not America. The people who benefit are the same people who always benefit. The same people who suddenly don't have to worry about 3,500 campus chapters shifting against them. The same people who saw Kirk's hesitation as a threat. Because if Charlie Kirk, their golden boy, could doubt, then every conservative student in America could doubt too. That's the nightmare scenario.

And what happened right after his death? Shapiro stepped up, ready with his new tour. Donors stopped complaining. Turning Point USA suddenly had new handlers. The machine didn't miss a beat. The blood wasn't even dry before the replacement program was rolling.

But hey, remember: It was a lone gunman. Always a lone gunman.

Isn't it amazing how the lone gunman always seems to clear the field for the most powerful people alive? Kennedy, King, Malcolm, now Kirk. Just random nobodies with perfect timing, doing the dirty work history demands. “Nothing suspicious here.”

And while Americans rage at each other, left versus right, MAGA versus woke, CIA versus Deep State, Israel carries on like nothing happened. Bombing hospitals, cutting off water, starving [people].

So, “No, Israel didn’t kill Charlie Kirk. Don’t say that. Don’t even think it. It’s absurd. It’s insane. It’s stupid. Just a coincidence that he broke ranks and then got silenced. Just a coincidence that his enemies are smiling now. Just a coincidence that while America tears itself apart over conspiracy theories, Israel keeps winning in Gaza.”

That’s the beauty of it. You don’t have to believe they pulled the trigger. You just have to look at who’s still standing, still bombing, still collecting checks, while the rest of us drown in outrage.

And when you do, the picture gets very clear, very fast. 

Well said, Macintosh Team!

I love the line: “No one looks at the one country that always benefits from division: Israel.”

Israel is a pariah state that only exists to destroy every Gentile nation it can via sowing division and chaos within those countries. Every goy killed by another goy is a goy that Zionist Jews don’t need to spend money killing.

And that’s exactly what Netanyahu’s puppet, Donald Trump, is trying to do to the United States. He is using the Zionist playbook and declaring American citizens “the enemy from within.”

Just this week, President Trump called all the U.S. military flag officers together to a personal meeting at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia. An unprecedented event. President Trump told the generals and admirals of our nation’s military:

We should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military… it’s the enemy from within, and we have to handle it before it gets out of control.
[Emphasis added]

Americans fighting Americans; Americans killing Americans; the American government setting the U.S. military against the American people. Who could possibly win by all of that? ISRAEL!

Will we ever be able to prove that Charlie Kirk was killed by an Israeli assassin? Of course not. Do I believe Charlie Kirk was killed by an Israeli assassin? You bet I do! That is, by a team of Israeli assassins.

I believe what I said in my Charlie Kirk Assassination Update address to Liberty Fellowship:

  1. The official FBI narrative is impossible to believe. I am absolutely convinced that the killing could not have happened the way they said it happened.
     
  2. I am absolutely convinced that the 22-year-old kid did not shoot Charlie Kirk.
     
  3. I am absolutely convinced that Kirk was not shot with a .30-06 caliber rifle.
     
  4. I am absolutely convinced that Charlie Kirk’s killing was a professional assassination.

And when it comes to professional assassinations, the State of Israel is the uncontested world leader. It is purely natural that millions of Americans believe in their gut that Israel killed Charlie Kirk. More than anyone else, Israel had motive, means and opportunity.

By eliminating Kirk, Israel eliminated the man they believed was their biggest traitor—and biggest threat.

Charlie had rebuffed Benjamin Netanyahu’s offer of over $100 million to toe the Israeli line and stop casting doubt on Israel’s behavior, stop inviting Israel truth-tellers such as Tucker Carlson to his Turning Point USA (TPUSA) events. He had rebuffed Zionist billionaire Bill Ackman’s threats, browbeating and intimidation to get back in line.

One day after the Ackman threat-fest, a shaken but defiant Charlie Kirk went on Megyn Kelly’s show to announce to the world how Zionists were threatening him over his criticisms of Israel. It was obvious that Charlie was going to double down on his sincere questions and doubts regarding Israel’s murderous conduct. That spells motive.

What about means and opportunity? No one had more of each than the State of Israel.

Israel is a world-class killing machine. It has assassins all over the world—including in the United States. It has the money, technology, transportation networks, munitions and political connections necessary to successfully plan, implement and escape detection of an assassination with ease.

Max Blumenthall reports that White House insiders who know Donald Trump say that Trump himself is very frightened of what Netanyahu would do to him if he does not toe the Israeli line.

It is self-evident that Israel would be the prime suspect in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Just take a look at the assassinations that Israel has carried out over the past couple of years.

Ismail Haniyehthe head of Gaza’s political office and chief negotiator, was assassinated by an Israeli strike in Tehran. He was there on a diplomatic mission in pursuit of a peace agreement. He was reportedly killed by a missile that hit him directly in a state guesthouse where he was staying. July 31, 2024

Of course, Israel has assassinated hundreds of journalists, physicians, medical personnel, clergymen, civic leaders, aid workers and tens or hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, a large number of them—small children and pregnant mothers included—by trained, expert snipers in Gaza. Even people in the flotilla of aid ships attempting to deliver humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza have been assassinated. Israel tried to assassinate Swedish activist Greta Thunberg but failed.

The Iranian consulate in Damascus, Syria, was attacked by Israel, killing many diplomats and negotiators. April 2024

Ali Shamkhani — Israel’s large-scale military attack on Iran targeted and killed this Iranian official who was the chief negotiator leading a committee on nuclear talks with the United States. The peace talks with the United States were arranged by President Donald Trump. June 13, 2025

Gazan negotiators were the target of an Israeli assassination in a residential area in the Qatari capital, Doha. Negotiators were there at the behest of President Donald Trump to discuss Trump’s ceasefire proposal. The negotiators survived the attack, but six others, including a Qatari security officer, were killed. September 9, 2025

Israel has also assassinated a host of civilian diplomats, leaders and ordinary citizens in Lebanon and Syria. And don’t forget the massive pager attacks that killed and wounded thousands of innocent people—mostly women and children—in Lebanon, Syria, London and other places.

Was it an act of respect or a graphic warning when Benjamin Netanyahu gave Donald Trump a golden pager during his visit to the White House? Was it a word of accomplishment or a word of warning when Netanyahu told the 250 Israel-supporting U.S. State legislators who were being wined and dined (and indoctrinated) in Israel, “Do you have cell phones? Do you have cell phones here? You're holding a piece of Israel right there.”

Israel has been a violent aggressor/terror state since the day it was created in 1948. And today its violent aggression and terrorist activity have risen to the stratosphere of the most evil, violent regimes of human history.

Only Charlie Kirk and his brand of young evangelical Trump conservatives remained blind to the truth about Israel. Most of the others under the age of 35 are now ardent opponents of the Zionist state. That doesn’t bode well for Israel’s future. And then to learn that the scales were coming off the eyes of Charlie, and if he followed in the footsteps of his good friend Candace Owens, well, Israel was not going to let that happen.

Speaking of Candace, she is challenging the leaders of TPUSA who are attempting to downplay Charlie’s rejection of the Israel narrative and even attempting to denigrate Candace’s testimony of how determined Charlie was to break with Israel.

On a podcast this week, Candace said: 

I'm gonna challenge Turning Point USA executives to issue a very clean statement saying that I am lying if this is not true.

About 48 hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause outright. Okay? Charlie was done. He said it explicitly, that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors.

Can you guys answer? Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself?

And then did he, just 48 hours later, conveniently catch a bullet to the throat before our onstage reunion could happen?

It's a yes or a no.

Explicitly, I want to hear from Turning Point USA that I'm lying about that.

Yeah. I'm putting the fire here right at the feet of Turning Point, because I am disgusted. I am genuinely disgusted. I am looking around and wondering whether Charlie's entire life was The Truman Show.

None of you guys are behaving in the way that you should be behaving. Okay? There is no way you are letting these lies fly unless, as I am hearing, unless it is true that there was a big, big, big payday that was on the line. And if Charlie radically stated that he was done with Israel, if Charlie said he had no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause because of, and I quote, Jewish donors, the behavior of Jewish donors, if he said that, yes or no, well then, I don't know, maybe, maybe some people didn't want to take that risk that he was gonna what? Become Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson at Turning Point USA with so much presence across college campuses? Maybe they didn't want to take the chance.

You see, I'm just one person. So, it's easy to just try to cancel my life and lie on me every second of every day. But Turning Point USA I think got a little bit bigger than Charlie, and I'm no longer gonna allow this lie and this narrative.

So, answer the questions, yes or no.

And I'm going to again challenge you to lie. And if you do lie, I'm going to expose the lies, and I'm going to start dropping videos actually. So, that's where I'm at. Enough of games, enough with trying to allow Israel to wrangle a narrative that you know is not true. 

Candace is emphatically clear: “Charlie was done. He said it explicitly, that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors.”

I admire and applaud Candace’s convictions and courage to call out the wanna-be leaders of TPUSA. She has more courage than a thousand evangelical pastors put together.

I can’t prove I’m right, and you can’t prove I’m wrong. But along with millions of your fellow Americans, you feel it in your gut: Israel did it."

© Chuck Baldwin 

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:

Chuck Baldwin Live Donate Form

End of very revealing and disturbing article...

I ask: is Candace Owens next on the "hit list"??

Don't be surprised if "something" happens, perhaps a "suicide" or an "accident"?

Remember, Candace is a practicing Catholic!

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 





The Land Of Saint Patrick And Shamrocks Leaves 108 Babies Left To Die After Failed Abortions In Ireland Since 2019 Legalization!

 Cold, brutal, heartless, and barbaric! But that's what happens when a people and a nation abandon God and His holy Church, the Natural ...