Answer one question: did you vote for Republican Governor Kelly Ayotte?
If you did, did you know she is, and always was, for the killing of the pre-born in the womb? In other words, a very pro-abortion, anti-life politician...
Did you also know -- like the apostates, Biden, Pelosi et al, that she claims to be a "practicing Catholic"?
Verbal gymnastics will not change that one iota!
Yet where is the bishop of the New Hampshire diocese in rebuking, admonishing and -- excommunicating this radical baby killer?
By the way, she also supports the queers/body mutilators and filthy books in the lower grades in the indoctrination centers known as the public school system in the Live Free Or Die State!
The Human Rights Campaign, which supports same-sex "marriage" and other gay rights, gave Ayotte an 80% rating!
Ayotte said of same-sex marriage: "Ultimately I do think this is a matter for the states and states should decide how to define marriage."...
Actually, Governor Ayotte, you are a little late to the game as that was done back at the creation of the world by our good God and Creator.
From lifesitenews.com and written by Matt Lamb Wed Jul 16, 2025 - 2:49 pm EDT, comes this very revealing article: New Hampshire GOP governor vetoes bills to protect parental rights in education, vaccine freedom - LifeSite
"(LifeSiteNews) — New Hampshire’s socially liberal Republican Governor Kelly Ayotte recently vetoed legislation meant to protect girls from being preyed on by gender-confused men. She also sided with liberals on mandatory vaccines, pornographic books in schools, surveying kids about private information, and teaching them about fetal development.
House Bill 148 would affirm that state antidiscrimination law does not forbid entities from keeping men out of girls’ sports, bathrooms, and locker rooms.
“This bill permits classification of individuals based on biological sex in lavatory facilities and locker rooms, sporting competitions, and detention facilities,” according to an analysis posted by LegiScan.
Ayotte sided with the transgender lobby and vetoed the bill, claiming it could be “exclusionary.”
“I believe there are important and legitimate privacy and safety concerns raised by biological males using places such as female locker rooms and being placed in female correctional facilities,” Ayotte wrote. “At the same time, I see that House Bill 148 is overly broad and impractical to enforce, potentially creating an exclusionary environment for some of our citizens.”
Ayotte also tried to play both sides in her statement, saying she “believe[s] that the legislature should address this serious issue” but “it must be done in a thoughtful and narrow way that protects the privacy, safety, and rights of all New Hampshire citizens.”
“However, with House Bill 148, I have concerns about the broadness of this bill, the unintended impacts accompanying its implementation, and that it will spur a plethora of litigation against local communities and businesses,” she wrote.
Much like liberal California Governor Gavin Newsom, Ayotte said she is concerned about men playing in girls’ sports but does not plan to sign legislation to actually address the issue.
She stated:
Furthermore, as the mother of a daughter who competed in three sports in high school, I have serious concerns about fairness and safety when biological males participate in women’s sports. State law already rightly addresses this by prohibiting biological males from competing in girls’ sports in K-12 schools. See RSA 193:41, RSA 193:42. While this law has been challenged in federal court, my administration will continue to vigorously defend it.
The language in House Bill 148 addressing women’s sports is largely redundant and, frankly, weaker than the current law. This exact piece of legislation was vetoed by Governor Sununu last year, and for the reasons stated above, I have decided to do the same.
Gov. Christopher Sununu was the liberal Republican governor who preceded Ayotte.
Teachers union thanks Gov. Ayotte for opposing parental rights
Gov. Ayotte again referenced her role as a parent in her decision to veto a conservative bill protecting kids from gender ideology.
House Bill 324 would make it easier for parents to object to pornographic content in school libraries.
However, Ayotte once against sided with social liberals, even winning praise from a teachers union, and vetoed the legislation.
“Current State law appears to provide a mechanism for parents through their local school district to exercise their rights to ensure their children are not exposed to inappropriate materials,” she wrote, after explaining there is a process in place. “Therefore, I do not believe the State of New Hampshire needs to, nor should it, engage in the role of addressing questions of literary value and appropriateness, particularly where the system created by House Bill 324 calls for monetary penalties based on subjective standards.”
This decision won her praise from the state teachers union.
“We hope this book ban bill veto represents a changing tide at the State House and call on lawmakers to listen to Granite Staters who overwhelmingly oppose classroom censorship efforts,” teachers union leader Megan Tuttle said, according to The Center Square. Ayotte, however, did sign legislation in June to protect parental rights.
Gov. Ayotte sided with liberals several more times in her vetoes. She also vetoed legislation that would require parents to opt their students into “non-academic surveys,” in public schools. Once again, Gov. Ayotte cited her role as a “parent” in explaining why she sided against parental rights.
“As a parent, I understand the concerns surrounding what type of material children are exposed to in school,” she said.
Ayotte also vetoed legislation, HB 358, that would have made it easy for parents to opt their children out of mandatory vaccines by simply stating they have a religious objection.
Rounding out her use of the veto pen, Ayotte vetoed legislation to require public schools to teach kids about fetal development using high-quality imagery.
“I do not believe the state should dictate to local school districts that they must show a high-quality computer generation or ultrasound video that shows the gestational development of a fetus in health classes,” she said. “That is not an appropriate role for the State to be mandating such requirements.”
The legislation mirrors other states, such as Indiana, that have passed “Baby Olivia” laws, a project of Live Action.
Ayotte previously opposed efforts to amend the state’s minimal 24-week abortion prohibition to a slightly better 15-week limit. Though a 15-week limit would still allow a vast majority of babies to be killed in the state, even that minor improvement went too far for Ayotte."
End of article...
In the end, we get what we deserve!
Pray for strength and honor!
Viva Cristo Rey! Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...
St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...
St. Joseph pray for us!!
Gene DeLalla
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment.