Cardinal Müller Condemns LGBT Jubilee Pilgrimage As Sacrilegious!!

 It is time to make a choice.

Make up your mind, now!

You (we) are either with and for Christ, or you (we) are against Christ.

There is no middle ground.

We must take a stand, if we don't, then we will be held accountable at our Particular Judgment and we will have to explain to Our Lord why we didn't suffer for Him, and instead we succumbed to the Zeitgeist, and offered incense to Ceasar all in the name of a false "unity" with the demonic powers who occupy the inner sanctum of the Vatican. 

We simply cannot -- cannot! -- go along to get along!

If you didn't hear or see the interview that Leo had with Crux Now, then you must!  

It is devastating!  It is unbelievable!

(See my article here: Thursday, September 18, 2025

"Friends, You Are Not Going To Believe This"!! Pope Leo On LGBTQ: ‘We Have To Change Attitudes Before We Ever Change Doctrine’.)

But I digress...

I urge you all to read what Cardinal Muller had to say about the blasphemous, sacrilegious monstrosity that took place during the recent "LGBT Jubilee Pilgrimage" that went through the Holy Door at St. Peter's in Rome.

From lifesitenews.com and written by the LifeSiteNews staff Thu Sep 18, 2025 - 5:23 pm EDT: Cardinal Müller condemns LGBT Jubilee pilgrimage as sacrilegious - LifeSite

"(LifeSiteNews) — German Cardinal Gerhard Müller became the latest high-ranking cleric to denounce the shocking LGBT pilgrimage held at St. Peter’s Basilica earlier this month.

During an exclusive interview with Vatican reporter Diane Montagna, Müller, who served as the Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under Pope Francis, denounced the so-called LGBT Jubilee pilgrimage as “just one example of an effort to take over the Church for anti-Christian interests.”

“They desecrated the temple of God, ‘making the Father’s house a marketplace’ (Jn 2: 17). The LGBT movement is absolutely against the will of God the Creator, who instituted marriage as a holy sacrament in Christ, and it is an absolute scandal that this occurred,” His Excellency declared. “They instrumentalize(d) and abuse(d) religious symbols to create propaganda for an anti-Christian ideology.”

The LGBT pilgrimage was held on September 6. On September 5, Jesuit priest Fr. James Martin posted a video on social media of a Mass celebrated for pilgrims at the Oratory of St. Francis Xavier in Rome by Father Sam Sawyer, S.J., the editor-in-chief of the Jesuit-run America Magazine.

The pilgrimage welcomed over 1,000 “LGBT Catholic” from across the world. Marching behind a rainbow cross, many attendees flew LGBT flags while holding hands with their same-sex “partners” and processing through the Holy Door at St. Peter’s.

As reported by LifeSite’s Vatican correspondent Michael Haynes, the procession was part of the Vatican’s official Jubilee pilgrimage and was listed on its website. The event was organized by “La Tenda di Gionata” (“The Tent of Jonathan”), a pro-LGBT group. Martin’s Outreach organization also assisted with it. Bishop Francesco Savino of Cassano all’Jonio, Italy offered Mass at Gesu Church for the pilgrims earlier in the day on September 6.

A number of conservative-minded clergy and influencers denounced the pilgrimage. Bishop Athanasius Schneider called on Pope Leo to make public reparation for it. Former U.S. Apostolic Nuncio Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano issued a series of X posts rebuking it as well. In one of them, His Excellency quoted the words of Blessed Catherine Emmerich, an early 19th century visionary who spoke of “a strange large church” where “there was nothing holy in it.”

Müller told Montagna that it was “undoubtedly” a sacrilege for the pilgrimage to pass through the Holy Door.

“They abused the Catholic faith and the grace and symbol of the Holy Door — which is Jesus Christ — for the sake of propaganda, while living in open contradiction to the will of the Creator. They denigrated the Church of God by obscene gestures and by their lifestyle,” His Eminence said.

His Eminence also rebuked the pilgrimage’s coordinators for not having true care for the souls of the persons who attended it.

“If the motives behind these events were truly pastoral, the organizers would have sought to help everyone grow in repentance and union with Jesus Christ,” he remarked. “Blessing these couples is also a sacrilege and is completely opposed to the Word of God and Catholic doctrine. This ideology is not concerned with helping individuals who struggle with questions about their sexuality to live in conformity with the holy will of the Creator. Nor do its promoters care about eternal life or the salvation of souls. Rather, they promote an anti-Christian ideology that attacks the very concept of marriage and family — father, mother, and children.”

Montagna also asked Müller for his thoughts on Leo’s decision to welcome Martin to the Vatican for a private audience.

Martin had published photos of his meeting with Leo on social media, a move that was denounced by LifeSiteNews co-founder John-Henry Westen, among others.

“Both were aware that these photos would be misused to suggest the pope’s alignment with anti-Christian ideologies,” Müller said of the meeting. “Popes have sometimes received communist leaders, but no one ever believed that Pope John Paul II had anything in common with them; he spoke very clearly with them. Benedict XVI once met privately with Hans Küng, but not in a manner that could be instrumentalized, and certainly no one ever thought that Pope Benedict XVI would accept Küng’s theories. I believe that Pope Leo XIV, who has spoken clearly about the nature of Christian marriage, is very aware of what is happening and cannot easily be instrumentalized by anyone.”

Elise Ann Allen of Crux magazine conducted an interview with Pope Leo earlier this week. When asked about LGBT issues, he said, “I don’t have a plan at the moment … any issue dealing with the LGBTQ questions is highly polarizing within the Church. For now, because of what I’ve already tried to demonstrate and live out in terms of my understanding of being pope at this time in history, I’m trying not to continue to polarize or promote polarization in the church.”

At the same time, Leo seemed to not close the door definitively to the possibility of change on the matter in the future.

“People want the church doctrine to change, want attitudes to change. I think we have to change attitudes before we even think about changing what the Church says about any given question. I find it highly unlikely, certainly in the near future, that the church’s doctrine in terms of what the church teaches about sexuality, what the Church teaches about marriage, (will change),” he said."'

End of very disturbing article...

Yes, by all means, let us "change attitudes," then we'll be able to "change" Church teachings on faith, morals, doctrine and dogma!

We must all pray for the defeat of these modernist monsters -- and for their conversion!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!!

Gene DeLalla 

"Friends, You Are Not Going To Believe This"!! Pope Leo On LGBTQ: ‘We Have To Change Attitudes Before We Ever Change Doctrine’.

 You are really not going to believe this!!

From lifesitenews.com and written by John-Henry Westen Thu Sep 18, 2025 - 5:15 pm EDT: Pope Leo on LGBTQ: 'We have to change attitudes before we ever change doctrine' - LifeSite

"(LifeSiteNews) — Friends, you are not going to believe this.

In this first extended interview he’s just done with Crux Now, Leo XIV has basically said that the Church’s teaching on sexual morality could change. He actually even went there and implied that he could – in his words – “change the Church’s teaching” on women’s ordination.

Take a listen to what he said first on sexual morality. This is what he says after having been talking about LGBT issues for a while:

People want the Church doctrine to change, want attitudes to change. I think we have to change attitudes before we ever change doctrine.

That’s right, he’s strongly implying – well, he’s saying – that Church teaching could shift, if attitudes change first.

Might that be why we’ve had so much LGBT stuff in Rome lately, from Fr. James Martin to the LGBT pilgrimage? Are they trying to get our “attitudes to change”?

And what do you think the so-called “LGBT Catholics” are hearing when they hear Leo saying such a thing? It’s a very clear invitation and instruction: work to change attitudes, then we can change the teaching. Wow.

And rather than stating such changes were impossible, Leo said he thought it was unlikely that it would happen soon:

I find it highly unlikely, certainly in the immediate future, that the Church’s doctrine in terms of what the Church teaches about sexuality, what the Church teaches about marriage [will change].

Later, instead of stating that the Church’s teaching could not change, he merely said that he thought that it would remain the same:

I think that the Church’s teaching will continue as it is, and that’s what I have to say about that for right now.

You think it’s going to continue as it is? Aren’t you supposed to be the Pope – the one responsible for making sure that it continues as it is?

Look friends, this is just stunning. Catholic teaching on sexual morality – including the sinfulness of homosexual acts, as well as fornication, adultery and others – aren’t matters of probabilities or personal conjecture, or contingent and waiting to be changed.

They’re definitive, grounded in both the natural law and divine revelation – and so they’re incapable of being changed.

Reason alone tells us that sexual activity outside marriage – and thus, obviously, all sexual activity between two same sex couples – is contrary to the natural law.

This is also and separately a dogma – divinely revealed in Scripture and proposed by the universal ordinary magisterium of the Church.

Vatican I taught that such truths which are to be believed with divine and Catholic faith.

READ: Pope Leo vows to ‘continue’ Francis’s ‘prophetic vision’ for the Church

Female ordination

Leo also talked about the possibility of the ordination of women to the diaconate in similar terms:

What the synod had spoken about specifically was the ordination, perhaps, of women deacons, which has been a question that’s been studied for many years now. There’ve been different commissions appointed by different popes to say, what can we do about this? I think that will continue to be an issue.

Ok, so in the early Church, there was indeed an office of “deaconess” – but everyone knows that these women were not ordained to any sacramental holy order of the diaconate.

But Leo calls even this into question by equating the female diaconate with that of the permanent diaconate established after the Second Vatican Council. He gives a long anecdote about meeting deacons and their wives in Rome before concluding:

[T]here are parts of the world that never really promoted the permanent deaconate, and that itself became a question: Why would we talk about ordaining women to the diaconate if the diaconate itself is not yet properly understood and properly developed and promoted within the church?

He also expressed his willingness for study and debate on the matter to continue, saying he was “certainly willing to continue to listen to people,” and pointing to the study groups in Rome on the subject. “We’ll walk with that and see what comes,” he said.

But do you know what’s even more shocking? Leo said this:

I at the moment don’t have an intention of changing the teaching of the Church on the topic.

Friends, if you say a thing like that, it’s clear what you think. You’re saying you do have the power to “change the teaching of the Church.”

The immutability of dogma

But the teaching of the Church says that this isn’t possible. Can that be changed too?

Vatican I denied that the Pope could change the Church’s teaching or introduce new dogmas. It taught:

For the holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine.

It goes on to say that the purpose of the papacy is to safeguard and preserve the deposit of faith. Not to consider whether the time is right to change it.

Oh, some will say, we’re not talking about changes. This is just a development of dogma.

Come on. That’s what they always say to justify this stuff. And anyway, Leo was pretty clear: he’s the one who was talking about changing Church teaching.

And anyway, that defense is excluded too. There’s a legitimate sense of the development of doctrine, but changing the meanings of dogmas to something totally different isn’t it.

Such an idea has been condemned time and again by the Church.

Pope Pius IX condemned, in the Syllabus of Errors, the idea that divine revelation is “subject to a continual and indefinite progress.”

Vatican I declared that the “meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to be maintained” and that “there must never be any abandonment of this sense under the pretext or in the name of a more profound understanding.”

That same Council anathematized anyone who says dogma can be assigned “a sense different from that which the Church has understood and understands.”

Pope St Pius X cited all these teachings in his encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis against Modernism.

In his Oath Against Modernism, he also required clergy to profess that dogma is handed down “in exactly the same meaning and always in the same purport.”

This oath also states that the idea “that dogmas evolve and change from one meaning to another different from the one which the Church held previously” is a – get this – “heretical misrepresentation.”

READ: Pope Leo says Latin Mass question ‘very complicated’

Grave implications

“Heretical” is a big word. But the truth is clear: homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered, marriage is between one man and one woman, and these teachings cannot change.

As I said above, both the Church’s teaching on sexual morality, and the immutability of dogma are the sorts of truths we have to believe with divine and Catholic faith.

The censure attached to the obstinate denial or doubt of such truths is indeed heresy. (Can. 751 of 1983 CIC, Can. 1325 of 1917 CIC)

So, where does that leave us?

The hugely problematic situation of Leo XIV raising hopes for an impossible change in the future.

And claiming the power to change Church teaching, which he certainly does not have.

And… publicly doubting (or even denying) these two sets of truths in a video interview – which, as I said, is heresy.

You know what St. Paul said about those who try to introduce new dogmas, doctrines or Gospels:

If I, or an angel from heaven, preach to you a Gospel different to that which we have preached to you, which you have received: let him be anathema.

 Here we go again, guys."

End of very revealing and disturbing article...

---

Follow John-Henry

John-Henry is the co-founder and CEO of LifeSiteNews.com. He and his wife Dianne have eight children and they live in the Ottawa Valley in Ontario, Canada.

He has spoken at conferences and retreats, and appeared on radio and television throughout the world. John-Henry founded the Rome Life Forum, an annual strategy meeting for life, faith and family leaders worldwide. He is a board member of the John Paul II Academy for Human Life and the Family. He is a consultant to Canada’s largest pro-life organization Campaign Life Coalition, and serves on the executive of the Ontario branch of the organization. He has run three times for political office in the province of Ontario representing the Family Coalition Party.

John-Henry earned an MA from the University of Toronto in School and Child Clinical Psychology and an Honours BA from York University in Psychology.

Pray for the defeat of these modernist monsters and for their conversion to the Catholic Faith...

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla

 

Kash Patel Says FBI Officials Have Been Fired For Role In Targeting Latin Mass Catholics!

 It's about time...

But I bet there are still far too many moles embedded deep in the inner sanctum of the FBI and other agencies of the "deep state" along with their God-hating cronies...

We all knew that the former director of the FBI, C. Wray, was lying through his teeth, read: perjury!   

I ask, why hasn't he been brought up on the charge of perjury, convicted and thrown in jail??

From lifesitenews.com comes this revelation: Kash Patel says FBI officials have been fired for role in targeting Latin Mass Catholics - LifeSite and written by Emily Mangiaracina 

Wed Sep 17, 2025 - 4:44 pm EDT...

"WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — FBI Director Kash Patel told Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) that FBI officials had been fired due to the bureau’s targeting of traditional Catholics, as shown by an infamous leaked 2023 memo.

Hawley questioned Patel about the FBI’s response to the persecution of Christians, especially Catholics, in the U.S. during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday.

Referring to the bombshell memo, created under the leadership of former FBI Director Christopher Wray, Hawley asked Patel how the FBI came to recruit informants in Christian churches.

Patel said the FBI has made “permanent fixes” to ensure that informants are not placed in houses of worship unless needed for an “ongoing criminal or terrorism threat.”

“Has anybody been fired for this?” Hawley asked.

“There have been terminations related to this and resignations,” Patel said. The memo in question called for spying on and infiltrating traditional Roman Catholic groups, in particular, churches served by the traditional Society of St. Pius X (SSPX). The document claimed that so-called “Radical Traditionalist Catholic Ideology” was a magnet for “violent extremists.”

“Good… Because if this is gonna be standard at the FBI, nobody can trust the FBI,” replied Hawley. “You wanna talk about violation of the First Amendment? This has got First Amendment violation written all over it.” 

“It is one of the most revolting chapters in the FBI’s history,” he added.

During the hearing, Hawley highlighted the heightened attacks on Christians in recent years, including shootings at Christian elementary schools and acts of vandalism and arson against churches across the country, as well as the assassination of Charlie Kirk, an outspoken Christian.

The senator cited a report that found that there were over 400 instances of hostility against churches in the U.S. in 2024, while another report found that there were over 500 attacks on Catholic parishes alone since May of 2020.

“What is the FBI doing to take on this rising tide of violence that seems to be motivated by anti-religious hatred?” asked Hawley.

Patel said the FBI is investigating 60 reports of anti-Catholic hate crimes, adding that he was able to disclose that the agency is conducting anti-Catholic hate crime investigations in the cities of Kansas City, Louisville, Houston, Nashville, and Richmond specifically.

When questioned about whether the FBI would investigate more deeply into potential “cells” helping to fund and facilitate such anti-Catholic attacks, Patel assured Hawley, “We are not stopping at the perpetrators themselves.”

The FBI director said his agency is “reverse engineering” the chain of events leading to such hate crimes to hold accountable those who fund them. 

Months after the memo targeting traditional Catholics was released, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) announced that documents that he obtained from the FBI indicated that its field office in Richmond, Virginia, coordinated with two other offices across the country to spy on traditional Catholics. 

The finding appeared to contradict Wray’s previous testimony that the FBI memo targeting traditional Catholics was only utilized at the one location in Richmond.  

Violence against churches in the U.S. escalated after the leak of the Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. That decision, Dobbs v. Jackson, inspired a wave of threats and vandalism against churches and pregnancy centers, which mostly went unpunished, with former Attorney General Merrick Garland citing the supposed difficulty of gathering evidence.

However, hate crimes against Christians had already been growing in the country. A 2023 report from the Family Research Council (FRC) found that anti-Christian attacks on churches steadily increased from 2018 to 2022.

FRC “identified a total of 420 documented acts of hostility that targeted 397 individual churches” in the U.S. during that period.

The recent high-profile assassination of evangelical Christian Charlie Kirk has been described by some commentators, including Tucker Carlson, as motivated by anti-Christian hatred."

End of very revealing article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 

Israel Is Committing Genocide. This Is A Fact, Not An Opinion.

 I could post more than a few articles to show the fact of genocide being executed by the atheistic, Christ-hating Israelis, but I will post this one: Israel Is Committing Genocide. This Is A Fact, Not An Opinion. – Caitlin Johnstone

The subheading: "At this point the only people who still deny that Israel is committing genocide are those who want to make sure nobody does anything to stop Israel from committing genocide."

"A UN inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, and that Israeli authorities have “intended to kill as many Palestinians as possible” in the enclave.

Israel has responded to the UN report by calling it Hamas and antisemitic, because that’s all they’ve got. The Israeli Foreign Ministry released a statement claiming the report was authored by “individuals serving as Hamas proxies, notorious for their openly antisemitic positions.”

Blah, blah, blah. The report is Hamas and antisemitic. All human rights organizations are Hamas and antisemitic. There’s a giant global antisemitic Hamas conspiracy dedicated to making it appear as though Israel is committing genocide, just to make Jewish people feel sad.

At this point the only people who still deny that Israel is committing genocide are those who want to make sure nobody does anything to stop Israel from committing genocide.

The list of humanitarian institutions who accuse Israel of genocide now includes:

1. The United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory

2. The International Association of Genocide Scholars

3. B’Tselem (an Israeli organization)

4. Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (another Israeli organization)

5. Amnesty International

6. Doctors Without Borders

7. The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights

8. Human Rights Watch

9. The International Federation for Human Rights

10. The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention

The list of humanitarian institutions who say Israel is NOT committing genocide in Gaza includes:

1. Nobody

2. No one

3. Zero

4. Nothing

5. Nada

6. Zilch

7. Sweet damn all

8. A complete absence

9. Diddly squat

10. Bupkis

It is not okay to treat the fact that Israel is committing genocide like it’s a matter of opinion. Every relevant human rights institution on earth says it’s a genocide. Zero equivalent institutions say it’s not. This is a settled matter.

People who deny that it’s a genocide deserve to be taken exactly as seriously as flat earthers. They’re just an extremely evil and destructive version of the thing flat earthers are.

You don’t see news articles about NASA with journalists adding “an agency which many believe is a government hoax designed to trick us into accepting ball earth theory” to their reporting. If a guest mentions Antarctica on the BBC, the news anchor doesn’t interrupt them to say “and we should say here that flat earth theorists deny the existence of that continent, maintaining that it is actually a wall of ice holding the oceans in place.”

You also don’t see reporting which treats accepted science about space and our planet like it’s an opinion held by some. You never see “which many scientists claim exists” when a report discusses outer space, or mentions of the horizon mitigated with words like “which some hold is due to the curvature of the earth rather than laws of perspective and light refraction”. They’re just treated as established facts, and those who disagree with the established facts are not taken seriously.

The genocide in Gaza should be no different. As the old adage goes, if one side says it’s raining and the other says it isn’t, your job isn’t to quote both sides, your job is to look out the window.

The window’s right there, western media. And it’s pouring genocide."

End of very revealing article...

________________

(The best way to make sure you see everything I write is to get on my free mailing list. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. Click here for links for my social media, books, merch, and audio/video versions of each article. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.)

Pray for the defeat of these Christ-hating, life-hating Israelis and for their conversion...

Pray too for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla