Friday, July 25, 2025

More Reasons Why Our Good God Will Destroy The Majority Of Mankind: Brazilian Janitor Faces Up To 5 Years In Prison For Asking Man To Leave Women’s Bathroom!!

 Do you think that this lunacy can't happen here?

I will clearly state that if Harris/Walz had won the 2024 presidential election -- thank Heaven these Marxists didn't! -- then what is happening in the Marxist haven of Brazil, could very well have happened in the U.S. of A.!

As it stands now, even with President Trump at the helm of the ship of state, and Bondi as A.G., there is still the holdover sodomite supporters deep down in the rabbit holes of various federal agencies waiting for a chance to turn America into Amerika...

Let's face it, the Demonrat party will not give up or in, until their heinous, demonic agenda comes to fruition, that is, killing of the pre-born, whether in the womb or as the poor baby is being delivered, plus their love of the sin of Sodom, pushing the citizenry to accept this abomination as normal.

One of their tactics is to poison the youth by indoctrinating them in those seedbeds of evil, the public school system, subverting any iota of moral and spiritual integrity, and undermining parental rights!

The sad state of Brazil is nothing short of astonishing!

I wonder: have any clergy come to the aid of these persecuted folks??

Here is that article from lifesitenews.com and written by Jonathon Van Maren Thu Jul 24, 2025 - 11:41 am EDT: Brazilian janitor faces up to 5 years in prison for asking man to leave women’s bathroom - LifeSite

"(LifeSiteNews) — While progressive groups decry the Trump administration’s ongoing purge of gender ideology from the federal leviathan and growing pushback against the transgender agenda in the United Kingdom, crackdowns on dissent from gender ideology continue in other countries.  

In Brazil, a university administrator and a female janitor are facing up to five years in jail for the fictitious crime of “social racism” after being reported to the police for “transphobia” by a transgender-identifying male student named “Odara” Moraes, who was furious after being asked to use the male restroom on October 14, 2022, at the Federal University of Paraíba.

 Moraes went into one of the female bathrooms on campus, clearly identifiable as male, wearing a crop top and a miniskirt. Moraes was asked by a female janitor, who spoke to Reduxx on the condition of anonymity, to leave. (Reduxx refers to the janitor, in their reporting, as “Luiza” to protect her from being targeted by transgender activists.) Despite the fact that he was asked politely and the janitor had meant no offense, Moraes promptly went to the police to complain of transphobia. 

As Reduxx reported: 

“That day, I was backup. I did have a fixed department, but I had asked to be placed on technical reserve as floating staff so I could work in different areas of the campus and make new friends,” Luiza explains. “I’d worked at [the University] for almost nine years, and I had never experienced an issue like this before. It was always ‘female bathroom’ and ‘male bathroom.’” 

“I didn’t mean to offend anyone or hurt anyone. I just spoke to him politely, and I was politely bothered. Because it was a female space, not a male one. I was simply speaking about a fact, about a right — my right as a woman to defend our space, a female space. I had never seen anything like that before — a man using a women’s bathroom,” she says. But Moraes immediately became combative, pulling out his phone to begin filming her and calling her “transphobic.” He also demanded that she refer to him with feminine pronouns. 

Moraes “demanded to speak with campus administration” and was taken to the office of Luiz Adripaulo, the university administrative director; on the way there, Moraes “continued to lambast [Luiza], calling her names and accusing her repeatedly of transphobia.” The meeting with Adripaulo only heightened his anger: 

Adripaulo attempted to de-escalate the situation, but Moraes refused and instead repeatedly asserted that he would call the police and press charges against Luiza for “transphobia” – a criminal offense in Brazil. Unsure of what to do, Adripaulo asked Moraes if he had any legal documents proving he was a woman, but Moraes responded that his “word” should simply be enough. After being “misgendered” by Adripaulo, Moraes stormed out of the office screaming that he had been “discriminated against.” 

On October 18, 2022, both Adripaulo and Luiza were told by police that they were being investigated for transphobia. “In my 41 years, I had never set foot in a police station in my life. It was the first time. And I was worried — I thought about my children, my family. It was the kind of worry any parent would have. I never imagined something like this would happen to me,” Luiza told Reduxx.

Adripaulo concurred. “I came to work feeling discouraged, almost angry, struggling to avoid depression and not pass on the psychological and emotional pressure I was experiencing to my subordinates. I became distracted from my work activities and fell behind on many tasks.” The threat of legal ramifications merely for affirming the observable, biological truth was bewildering and disorienting for both. 

Early the following year, Luiza’s contract was not renewed by the third-party employer she worked with. For the first time in nearly 10 years, she was suddenly out of work.  

“I don’t know. I really don’t know if that’s why I’m still unemployed. I’ve even applied for unemployment, but still nothing. And I also have a five-year-old daughter. It’s hard to find a job because I can only work during the hours she’s at daycare — from 7 a.m. to 4 p.m. And there just aren’t many jobs with those hours,” Luiza said. “Monday to Friday is especially hard. My husband works, my son works too. I have no one to watch my daughter.” 

“Emotionally, my family and I were devastated, we didn’t know how to react. My wife cries in the early hours of the morning; One day I woke up, she was crying on the sofa,” Adripaula told Reduxx. “I made a tremendous effort not to let my children and wife notice what emotional state I’m in right now.” 

Both were charged in October 2024 of “aggravated prejudice” and “social racism,” which Reduxx notes is “an offense created by Brazil’s Supreme Court in 2019 when it found that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity was in fact covered under already pre-existing anti-discrimination laws relating to race or national origin.” Their trial began in March 2025; a decision is expected soon. As previously noted, their “transphobia” could result in prison sentences of between two and five years. The two are currently being assisted by the women’s rights organization MATRIA Brazil, which seeks to defend sex-segregated spaces.  

Progressive groups and mainstream media organizations, meanwhile, have not uttered a peep about these political prosecutions. CNN recently bemoaned the fact that the Trump administration is taking an “all-government approach” to rooting out gender ideology. Not mentioned, of course, is what the “all-government approach” to implementing gender ideology looks like—innocent men and women, prosecuted and persecuted under the new rules of an ideology that almost nobody had heard of two decades ago."

Featured Image

Jonathon’s writings have been translated into more than six languages and in addition to LifeSiteNews, has been published in the National PostNational ReviewFirst Things, The Federalist, The American Conservative, The Stream, the Jewish Independent, the Hamilton SpectatorReformed Perspective Magazine, and LifeNews, among others. He is a contributing editor to The European Conservative.

His insights have been featured on CTV, Global News, and the CBC, as well as over twenty radio stations. He regularly speaks on a variety of social issues at universities, high schools, churches, and other functions in Canada, the United States, and Europe.

He is the author of The Culture WarSeeing is Believing: Why Our Culture Must Face the Victims of AbortionPatriots: The Untold Story of Ireland’s Pro-Life MovementPrairie Lion: The Life and Times of Ted Byfield, and co-author of A Guide to Discussing Assisted Suicide with Blaise Alleyne.

Jonathon serves as the communications director for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform.


End of very revealing article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 
















Thursday, July 24, 2025

This Should Scare The HELL Out Of Anyone Entering A Hospital, That Is, If You Aren't Absolutely -- Legally -- Prepared!

 WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!! 

"Trump HHS finds patients are being taken for organ retrieval while still alive"

The following article contains very disturbing information that may be upsetting for some... Beware!

From lifesitenews.com and written by Heidi Klessig, M.D. Wed Jul 23, 2025 - 4:00 pm EDT: Trump HHS finds patients are being taken for organ retrieval while still alive - LifeSite

"(LifeSiteNews) — On July 21, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announced a major push to begin reforming the U.S. organ procurement and transplantation system. This announcement was prompted by a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) investigation that uncovered multiple examples of patients who were not dead when they were taken for organ procurement.

The HRSA investigation revealed that out of 351 cases studied, 103 (29.3 percent) were found to have problems. They discovered 73 patients (21 percent) who were authorized for organ procurement despite having neurological signs incompatible with organ donation. And disturbingly, at least 28 patients (8 percent) may not have been deceased when doctors began surgery to remove their organs.

The independent HRSA investigation began after the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) claimed to find no major concerns in their review of the 2021 TJ Hoover case. TJ Hoover, a supposedly “brain dead” man, began thrashing and crying as he was being wheeled to the operating room to donate his organs. His family was told that this was just “reflexes.” Whistleblowers claimed that even after two doctors refused to remove Hoover’s organs, Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates ordered their staff to find another doctor to perform the surgery. Thankfully, surgery was called off, and Hoover went on to recover and even dance at his sister’s wedding.

On July 20, 2025, the New York Times published an article reporting multiple cases of donors who were not dead when they were scheduled for organ procurement. This article focused on the problems of “donation after circulatory death” (DCD). In DCD, patients are not “brain dead” but either are not expected to survive or have decided that their quality of life is unacceptable. Their deaths are planned to occur at a specific place and time so that they can become organ donors.

The patient is made “do not resuscitate” (DNR), ventilators and infusions are withdrawn, and doctors wait until the patient’s heart stops. Then, depending on the transplant center, a two-five minute “no touch” period is observed, following which (if the heart doesn’t restart on its own) organ procurement immediately begins. However, it is well documented that people are routinely resuscitated after just two-five minutes of pulselessness – and if you could possibly be resuscitated, you were never dead.

But because DCD donors have been made DNR, they will not be resuscitated. In 2007, Dr. Ari Joffe published a report of a dozen patients whose hearts started beating again spontaneously after as many as 10 minutes of cardiac arrest, with some of them making a full recovery. This shows that people cannot be known to be dead until at least ten minutes after their cardiac arrest. But doctors are currently moving more quickly because waiting ten minutes makes it too late to successfully harvest most of the organs. The current two-five minute “no touch” period is much too short and essentially guarantees that more people will be waking up under the knife. Other countries recognize these dangers, and DCD is banned in Finland, Germany, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Hungary, Lithuania, and Turkey.

One of the cases described in the New York Times article was that of DCD donor Misty Hawkins. After a choking accident, Hawkins suffered a brain injury and was comatose on a ventilator. She was not brain dead, but doctors told her parents that she would never wake up. Her mother did not want Misty to suffer, and because she wanted something good to come out of this tragedy, she consented to making her daughter a DCD organ donor.

Misty was taken to the operating room, where a doctor took her off the ventilator and gave her drugs for comfort. Her heart stopped 103 minutes later. After a five-minute waiting period, surgery began. But when surgeons sawed through her breastbone, they discovered that Misty’s heart was beating and that she was gasping for breath. Organ retrieval was called off, and 12 minutes later, Misty was declared dead a second time. It is unclear whether she received any anesthesia. At the time, her parents were only told that Misty had been unable to donate her organs. It was not until they were contacted by the New York Times over a year later that they learned the rest of the story.

Yesterday morning, I sent a formal complaint to the OPTN, HRSA, and the investigating U.S. House committee that was signed by over 300 doctors, nurses, lawyers, philosophers, PhDs, and citizens.

I am very encouraged that so many are finally taking these deeply problematic practices seriously. But going forward, this is going to be a difficult moral, medical, and legal knot to untangle. As our country seeks solutions, these are the key goals I have identified:

  1. The public needs full transparency about how death is declared prior to organ and tissue procurement, for without transparency there is no true consent.
  2. We need an opt-out exemption to a brain death diagnosis nationwide. There are eight states with medical freedom laws that allow healthcare providers to opt out of participating in a brain death case, but the only state where patients have this right is New Jersey. And New Jersey’s law only provides for a religious exemption: people should be able to opt out for any reason.
  3. Hospitals must mandate that doctors obtain informed consent before embarking on a brain death diagnosis, including the dangerous apnea test that can make a brain injury worse and has risks of hypotension, pneumothorax, and cardiac arrest.

It is also encouraging that many doctors are now taking a closer look at organ procurement and are interested in making changes. Living donation, in which both the donor and the recipient remain alive after the procedure, is completely ethical and can provide every organ except the heart. And a fully implantable artificial heart is currently in clinical trials. I am hoping that greater transparency will actually lead to more life-saving transplants, not less. After all, “brain death” accounts for <1% of reported deaths nationwide, whereas the number of living donors is potentially vast.

Hopefully we can provide justice for the families who have been hurt by the current unethical system without jeopardizing ethical forms of organ transplantation."

(Heidi Klessig MD is a retired anesthesiologist and pain management specialist who writes and speaks on the ethics of organ harvesting and transplantation. She is the author of “The Brain Death Fallacy”and her work may be found at respectforhumanlife.com.)

End of very disturbing and revealing article...

Pray for strength and honor!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 













Wednesday, July 23, 2025

During The Regime Of Biden, The FBI Spied On A Catholic Priest For Refusing To Divulge Details Of Conversations With Parishioner

 By now we know the truth of the attempts of the corrupt FBI, under the traitor and apostate, Biden, to spy and infiltrate traditional Latin Mass parishes seeking damning information -- at least in their minds -- about being potential seedbeds of "domestic extremism" and "terrorism"...

And the former corrupt head of the FBI, C. Wray, lied under oath -- read perjury! -- that the infamous memo sent out from the Richmond, VA field office was isolated to that office.

It was not!

In fact, it was coordinated with numerous offices on the West Coast and other locations!

Now comes this article from the 



Story by James Lynch

"The FBI began surveilling a Catholic priest in 2023 after the clergyman refused to divulge details about a recently arrested parishioner who was converting to Catholicism and seeking spiritual guidance.

The FBI’s Richmond Field Office, the same branch responsible for producing an anti-Catholic memo that was quickly retracted, tracked the priest’s movements and coordinated with several other FBI offices and a foreign law enforcement agency to gather intelligence on the clergyman and his priestly organization, according to a new House Judiciary Committee report obtained by National Review.

“This new information demonstrates that the FBI not only used its federal law enforcement resources to surveil certain Catholic Americans, but it also used these resources to investigate a clergy member,” the report asserts.

“From information made available to the Committee, there appeared to be no legitimate law-enforcement purpose for investigating this priest. This new information suggests that the FBI’s religious liberty abuses were more widespread than the FBI initially admitted and led the public to believe.”

The FBI declined to comment.

On January 4, 2023, an FBI employee from the Richmond office told colleagues about how the priest “became very uncomfortable and started incoherently shuttering” when the agents began asking him specific questions about one of his parishioners, including whether the man, who had recently been arrested, had “desires and plans to commit violence.” The priest responded by insisting that he had to speak with the Church hierarchy and its attorneys before speaking further with the FBI.

It’s unclear why the parishioner initially attracted the FBI’s attention. The report does not include any information about the parishioner’s criminal history.

The FBI agent asserted that priest-penitent privilege did not apply because the subject of the FBI’s investigation had yet to be baptized and had not finished the conversion process.

The priest did not to speak with the FBI further and continued to visit the subject in prison. Catholic priests regularly visit prisons to offer support and conduct ministry for incarcerated individuals.

Two days later, Richmond field office employees exchanged emails with Louisville colleagues about their attempt to interview the priest and planned investigation into him. It is unclear what role the Louisville field office played in the investigation beyond corresponding about what steps to take.

FBI Richmond employees quickly began examining the priest’s ordination history and affiliation with the Society of Saint Pius X, a traditionalist priestly fraternity that holds an irregular canonical status with the Catholic Church. SSPX bishops were excommunicated in 1988 but the order was lifted in 2009. SSPX remains outside of full communion with the Vatican.

The Judiciary Committee documents show the FBI Richmond office sought to work with Louisville and London law enforcement to gather more intelligence about SSPX and the priest. FBI Richmond employees were aware of the priest’s plans to attend a video conference in the U.K. and wanted to plan a meeting with London police’s counterterrorism division to see if they had more information about SSPX and the priest. Individuals from the FBI’s counterterrorism division were also brought into the loop to help coordinate investigative steps and potentially learn more from U.K. police about SSPX’s recruitment practices.

Emails between FBI Richmond, Louisville, and counterterrorism staff indicate the agents were tracking the priest’s movements and had access to his credit card information during a trip he took to Canada ahead of the U.K. conference in January 2023. The Richmond field office received approval on a foreign dissemination request from the counterterrorism division on January 12 in order to move forward with the meeting.

The foreign dissemination request is a document outlining the reasons why FBI Richmond sought information from the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command. Richmond employees and the FBI’s London counterparts appeared to schedule a call for January 19, 2023, the day before the priest’s trip to the U.K.

The priest described in the new congressional report is also mentioned in the Richmond field office’s infamous anti-Catholic memo issued in January 2023. The Richmond memo likened traditionalist Catholics to violent extremists and was quickly retracted in February 2023 after widespread backlash. Ever since, the FBI has done damage control and cast the document as an isolated product developed by one office, rather than a reflection of a broader pattern.

The Judiciary Committee previously published a report on the memo’s development and found it was based on a single investigation. Many FBI analysts involved with the memo had no idea what it meant to be a “radical-traditional” Catholic, despite the memo’s warnings about such ideology.

FBI Richmond’s memo was largely based on left-wing media articles slandering Catholics and their pro-life views. Some of the articles include notations from an anti-Catholic employee at the Richmond office, the latest House Judiciary Committee report reveals. Additionally, the Richmond memo relied on information from the Southern Poverty Law Center, a progressive smear organization that regularly maligns conservative organizations as “extremist.”

FBI director Kash Patel has produced a trove of records to House and Senate investigators related to the FBI’s anti-Catholic activities. Patel promised to do so at his confirmation hearing in January after the FBI stonewalled Republican lawmakers under former FBI Director Christopher Wray’s leadership.

Earlier this year, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) released documents indicating the FBI’s targeting of traditionalist Catholics was much more widespread than originally thought, contradicting Wray’s congressional testimony about the matter. Grassley’s records demonstrated that the FBI produced over a dozen documents and five attachments with anti-Catholic terminology in them. The FBI was planning on producing a second memo similar to the Richmond one until the public outcry, Grassley disclosed.

Grassley’s findings are consistent with the House Judiciary Committee’s most recent report. The House panel found that FBI headquarters gave tacit approval for the Richmond memo by agreeing to develop an agency wide document that would have maligned traditional Catholics nationwide.

Although FBI headquarters publicly distanced itself from the Richmond memo, the agency was aware of its development and employees from headquarters communicated with Richmond counterparts about its contents.

“The FBI never acknowledged, until Director Patel produced documents to the Committee, that Director Wray’s Headquarters tacitly approved of the content in the Richmond memorandum by agreeing to develop an external product that would have denigrated Catholic Americans and unfairly characterized them as potential terrorists,” the report reads.

The Judiciary Committee also confirmed Grassley’s discovery about the amount of anti-Catholic terminology in the FBI’s internal documents. Catholic policy experts have condemned the FBI’s behavior and argued it poses a threat to religious liberty."

End of very disturbing article...

Note: the author of this story, like many religion writers, know very little about the Catholic Faith and church matters as is evidenced by his remarks concerning the SSPX!

I do hope you were able to pick out his errors!

Pray for strength and honor -- and for our priests to maintain their seal of confession and threats to their confidentiality with their parishioners...

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla 







Apostate, "Catholic," Baby Killer Governor Newsom Of California, Gives More Proof That The Democrat Party Is The Party Of The DAMNED!!

 The evil that this character does is almost beyond belief!

I have one simple question: why hasn't his bishop publicly excommunicated this murderer of the pre-born??????? 

Why???

From lifenews.com and written by Katelynn Richardson  |   Jul 23, 2025: Gavin Newsom is Spending Millions to Kill More Babies in Abortions - LifeNews.com

"As cash continues to flow from blue states’ coffers into the hands of abortion activists, lawmakers in Democrat-led California found a way to keep taxpayers from finding out where their hard earned money is actually going.

California’s $20 million Abortion Practical Support Fund (APSF), approved shortly after Roe v. Wade was reversed, shields organizations receiving taxpayer-funded grants from public disclosure through an explicit exemption.

The Daily Caller News Foundation’s public records request seeking grant recipients was denied due to the exemption Democrats wrote into the law.

“It is shameful that Governor Gavin Newsom and California Democrats are concealing how taxpayer dollars are being spent to fund their abortion agenda,” Katie Glenn Daniel, director of legal affairs and policy counsel at Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, told the DCNF. “They are doubling down on extremism — promoting abortion tourism while abandoning women who are seeking real help and life-affirming alternatives.”

HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

Democrats argued the exemption should be included because the privacy of patients outweighs the public’s right to information about the grantees, according to a California Senate Judiciary Committee memo from April 2022.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom pledged the state would be a “safe haven” for women seeking abortion after the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022.

A public report on California’s APSF from January 2025 details services grant-funded organizations offered in the first year — including pharmacy expenses like pain medications to 1,343 patients, case management to 2,668, transportation to 1,172 and lodging to 630 — but does not include organization names.

“We were able to hire two part-time positions with this grant [including an] abortion services coordinator,” one unnamed organization that received a grant said in the state’s report.

California also allocated $40 million in 2022 for an Uncompensated Care Fund, which provides grants for healthcare providers to offer abortions to low-income patients, and $20 million for the Los Angeles County Abortion Safe Haven Grant Program. A nonprofit called Essential Access Health (EAH), which runs all three programs, is co-led by a former Planned Parenthood public affairs employee.

“California’s aggressive defiance of other states’ protections for babies and moms is helping drive the national toll of unborn American lives lost to at least 1.1 million a year,” Daniel told the DCNF. “At the same time, California has become one of the most dangerous places in America for unborn children — and one of the most isolating for women in need of true compassion and support.”

States “should not hide the use of tax-payer funding, especially where the state has determined that it is their public duty to intentionally end a human life in the womb,” Sarah Zagorski, senior director public relations and communication at Americans United for Life, told the DCNF.

“Unfortunately, California is not alone in trying to hide abortion behind the cloak of bureaucracy,” she said. “Numerous states have created so-called Shield Laws to keep the public in the dark and to remove accountability for abortion physicians.”

California’s Department of Health Care Access and Information and EAH did not respond to requests for comment.

Government Funded Abortions

When Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022, Republican-led states instituted laws restricting or banning abortion, while Democrat states became destinations for women seeking to end the life of their unborn child.

Several Democrat-run local governments have channeled public funds to pay for abortions and related expenses.

Maryland established a “Public Health Abortion Grant Program,” which took effect July 1 and will draw on $25 million set aside from a surplus of Obamacare insurance fees. The state can now steer $2.5 million annually to assist nonprofit abortion funds whose resources have been depleted by an influx of women crossing state lines, according to NPR.

Baltimore Mayor Brandon M. Scott announced in 2022 that the city would award a total of $167,900 to five organizations that facilitate access to abortions or birth control, including the Baltimore Abortion Fund and Planned Parenthood of Maryland.

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) announced in January that $1.8 million would be awarded to groups promoting the availability of abortions, including the Abortion Rights Fund of Western Massachusetts, Tides for Reproductive Freedom and the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts.

Jane’s Due Process, a group that helps underage girls in Texas access abortions without their parents, has received $409,430 from the City of Austin since 2020, according to city data.

The funds come from several contracts, including sexual wellness education and a birth control information text line.

Austin “has a goal of improving health and wellness outcomes among vulnerable communities and assisting low-income people with healthcare access,” a city spokesperson told the DCNF.

Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Austin in April for launching an out-of-state abortion travel fund, which also lists Jane’s Due Process as a recipient. The group claims in 2024 it helped 68 teens access abortions out-of-state and received 6,000 contacts from teens looking for abortion support or birth control."

(LifeNews Note: Katelynn Richardson writes for Daily Caller. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience.)

End of very revealing article...

Pray for the defeat of this modernist monster and for his conversion!

Viva Cristo Rey!  Bl. Fr. Miguel Pro, Fr. Emil Kapaun and Fr. Vincent Capodanno, pray for us...

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...

St. Joseph pray for us!!

Gene DeLalla



Treasonous Rat, Apostate, Biden's Corrupt CIA: In A Leaked Memo, Traditional Family Values Were Seen As Sign Of White ‘Extremism’!!

 Remember, Biden, the "Catholic in good standing," (according to the now-dead Bergoglio) hated traditional Catholics, especially t...