An open letter to all "new order" Catholics (from my 2004 letter).

            This is an open letter to all new order Catholics that may be reading this letter.

            Have you had enough?  

            Have you had enough of being indoctrinated by your priests and bishops that your precious Church – of which the blood of the martyrs of past ages became the seed of the Church – is only one of many that can lead to salvation?

            Have you had enough erroneous thinking that tells you that one can still be a good Catholic and still use birth control or believe that a woman has a “right” to kill her pre-born through abortion?  

            Have you had enough of priests who offer mass and make up their own prayers instead of following Church liturgy?  

            Have you had enough of pastors that invite radical, heretical groups to spit their venom of hate of what the Church has taught for 2,000 years and push their radical agenda of women “priests,” “tolerance” of perverse lifestyles, abortion and contraception, thus confusing an already confused laity?

            Have you had enough of now believing that the precious Mass of Catholics of the last 1,950 years was wrong and had to be changed by a non-dogmatic, liberal-controlled, renegade Vatican Council – the Second Vatican Council?

            Have you had enough of attending a ceremony – which is supposed to be a Mass instituted by Christ – that is now considered by many of the laity and the very priests that perform that ceremony, to be nothing more than a commemoration of a meal and not an un-bloody sacrifice of Christ’s bloody sacrifice of Calvary?

            Have you had enough of a mass that is said in the vulgar tongue and not in the true language of the Church – Latin?  

            Have you had enough of not knowing that the DOGMATIC Council of Trent specifically condemns the use of the vulgar tongue when used, only, in the Mass?

            Have you had enough of not knowing that even the renegade Second Vatican Council said that Latin was to continue to be language of the Mass?

            Have you had enough of not knowing that the traditional Latin Mass had never been abrogated?  

            Have you had enough of receiving the Host – the Body and Blood of Our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ – in your filthy hands?

            Have you had enough of not knowing that only the consecrated hands of a priest can touch the sacred Host?

            Have you had enough of not kneeling in reverence and awe and respect when receiving the consecrated Host of Christ?

            Have you had enough of believing that Christ is no longer truly present on the altar – the Real Presence – but only present in the gathering of the faithful?  

            Have you had enough of Catholic priests, bishops, cardinals and, yes, even the pope apologizing to every politically correct group under the sun for true Catholic action to defend and defeat the enemies of Holy Church over the past 2,000 years?

            Have you had enough of having your children being taught in “Catholic” schools the “virtues” of tolerance, diversity, inclusiveness and acceptance of the perverse and no longer being taught absolutes – the difference between what is right and wrong?

            Have you had enough…?

            We – traditional minded Catholics -- are Bible-believing; dogma-believing; pope-recognizing Catholics who participate in true ecumenism – that means doing our best to bring those outside the ark of salvation into the barque of St. Peter, lest they be lost in the flood!

Gene DeLalla

  

             

Americanism and abortion (from my 2003 article).

Pope Leo XIII did not have abortion in mind when he condemned Americanism as a heresy and a threat to the Catholic Faith. It is ironic that if he were still alive, he would see one of the most gruesome aspects of "Americanism" that has been perpetrated upon this nation since 1973 when the United States Supreme Court said, from that point in time, that a woman had a right to kill her pre-born child - legally - through some of the most ingenious and heinous methods imaginable. This "right" to kill a pre-born child, the advocates say, is somehow guaranteed by the very same Constitution that forbids it!

In the preamble to the founding document, we read: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

A more perfect Union?  How can there be a more perfect Union when we are allowed to kill off those who will make up the future Union?

Justice? What Justice is there in killing the pre-born for economic or social stigma or for any reason for that matter?

Domestic Tranquility? What has abortion wrought to the very parents who kill their offspring?

Provide for the common defense? With the killing of the pre-born, who will be left to protect an aging population from threat - real or imagined?

Promote the general Welfare? There will be no "welfare" to promote if no one is left…

And secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our POSTERITY? If we are allowed to kill those who make up the future - our posterity - there will be no one to enjoy the "blessings of liberty."

Let us now look at the Declaration of Independence and see what it says regarding government: "…But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." Does anyone not think that the killing of 60-plus-million pre-born children since 1973, many more times than the holocaust of World War II, is an abuse and a diabolical mark of absolute despotism? Should not the law enforcement and military help the citizen to overthrow this killing machine and establish a new and a more benevolent, God-fearing form of government? Why is this not being done?

The oft-quoted section of the Declaration of Independence nullifies the actions of the Supreme Court of 1973, it reads: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among them are LIFE, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Notice that the first of the unalienable (inalienable) rights is LIFE. Without life, there can be no other rights! The right to life has been trampled upon by a Supreme Court that is out of control. This once august body established as a system to determine whether a law passed by the state legislatures or Congress meets the criteria of Constitutionality, has, since the 1930's, taken on a life of its own - not to interpret the law, but to MAKE them! Is it any wonder why it would create the "constitutional" guarantee: the "right to choose"?

 At the beginning of this discourse, I mentioned that Pope Leo XIII condemned Americanism as a heresy and a threat to the Catholic Faith. In his encyclical: Testem Benevolentiae Nostrae, promulgated on January 22, 1899, he specifically cautioned and called into question, the then prevailing attitude of the American bishops regarding their relationships with members of other "faiths" and their willingness not to promote what is true Catholic doctrine or to water-down that doctrine in an effort to "go along to get along" - my phraseology, not the Pope's.   It must be admitted that by all accounts – as history has so proven – the American Church prelates all but ignored Leo’s admonishments regarding Americanism.   The consequences of this disobedience have been titanic.   For if the bishops and archbishops from the nineteenth, to our present century had followed Pope Leo XIII’s – and then Pope Pius X’s – stern warnings and condemnations, and had lived up to their obligations of guiding the flock to Christ, regardless of the consequences, the heinous scourge of abortion would have never occurred.   Logically, numerous other maladies would not have gotten a foothold nor hold such prominence as they do today: e.g., immorality, rampant homosexuality, divorce, etc.

Now that we have selfishly considered ourselves in this matter, what of the pre-born?

What is their fate when they are killed?

 Are we not supposed to know, love, and serve God in this life in order to be happy with Him in the next?

 How can the children who are killed in the womb fulfill this basic tenet of our existence?

 The answer to these questions is grimly simple: they are forever denied the Face of their Creator.   “Suffer the little children to come unto Me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God.”

Gene DeLalla 

If you need more evidence that innocent life is in grave danger in the U.K., then read this article.

The following article is from the website: Lifenews.com..

Please read and heed: this is from a nation that was once considered “Our Lady’s Dowry.”  For any non-Catholics out there reading this, this refers to the Blessed Virgin Mary (and of the Catholic Church) but has now become a cesspool of “assisted suicide” and outright murder without consent, of course.  Be wary if you have to enter a hospital, for whatever reason, whether here in the U.S., or, especially in the U.K.  God help us all.. Gene DeLalla.

 The British Supreme Court has ruled that doctors and families can revoke a patient’s life support and withhold food and water without his or her consent and without a court hearing.

The decision is particularly concerning — because it comes from a nation that is already pushing towards euthanasia. In the UK, with its government-run health care system, doctors and hospitals are routinely giving up on patients they believe are too far gone, even children such as Charlie Gard or Alfie Evans. In such instances they are pressuring families to allow life support to be revoked from patients they believe have no chance at life — even though other doctors and medical professionals disagree.

The ruling from the high court in Britain also comes after new reports that hundreds of patients are being euthanized in Belgium including three children. Leading pro-life organizations will likely see this ruling us another step towards euthanasia and pressuring patients to end their lives in assisted suicide.

The ruling essentially allows doctors and families to guess what a patient might want if no advance directive is in place — allowing patients to have their life support and food and fluids terminated and their lives taken even if that may not be the decision they would have wanted.

Here’s more:

End-of-life care can be withdrawn from patients in a permanent vegetative state without consulting a judge, the UK’s highest court ruled today. The Supreme Court upheld a decision that a man with an extensive brain injury, who can be identified only as Mr Y, should be allowed to die without his family going before a judge.

The ruling means that, in cases where families and doctors are in agreement, medical staff will be able to remove feeding tubes without applying to the Court of Protection.

The Supreme Court ruled on the case of a 52-year-old financial analyst, was from June 2017, was in a prolonged disorder of consciousness (PDOC) after suffering a cardiac arrest as a result of coronary artery disease.

Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

PDOC covers patients remaining in a coma, vegetative state and minimally conscious state after a brain injury.

Experts agreed it was highly improbable that Mr Y would re-emerge into consciousness and – even if he did – he would have profound cognitive and physical disability and always be dependent on others.

Mr Y had not drawn up any advance decision to refuse treatment but his family were firmly of the view that he would not want to be kept alive given the poor prognosis.

The anti-euthanasia group Care Not Killing has expressed “concern” and “disappointment” that the Supreme Court has removed an important safeguard from brain-damaged patients today.

The group informed LifeNews:

It complains that judges have ruled that doctors should be able to withdraw food and fluids without going to Court. The ruling will effect up to 24,000 patients with permanent vegetative state (PVS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), meaning they can now be effectively starved and dehydrated to death if the medical staff and relatives agree that this is in their ‘best interests’.

People with PVS (awake but not aware) and MCS (awake but only intermittently or partially aware) can breathe without ventilators, but need to have food and fluids by tube (clinically assisted nutrition and hydration or CANH).

These patients are not imminently dying and with good care can live for many years. Some may even regain awareness. But if CANH is withdrawn, then they will die from dehydration and starvation within two or three weeks.

Until last year all cases of PVS and MCS have had to go to the Court of Protection before CANH could be withdrawn.

Dr. Peter Saunders, Campaign Director of Care Not Killing, commented: “This is concerning and disappointing news, because it removes an important safeguard from those without a voice.

“The Court of Protection did not prevent clinically assisted nutrition and hydration or CANHbeing removed, indeed under the old rules, introduced after the Tony Bland case in 1993 there have been over 100 such cases, but it did ensure independent scrutiny of any application. It did this because it recognised the emotional and financial pressure that families and clinicians can fell under.”

Saunders continued: “In making these declarations Lady Black and the Supreme Court has dramatically moved the goalposts on end of life decision-making. Once we accept that death by dehydration is in some brain-damaged people’s ‘best interests’ we are on a very slippery slope indeed.

“There is a clear difference between turning off a ventilator on a brain-dead patient and removing CANH from a brain-damaged patient. PVS and MCS differ from conditions with a ‘downward trajectory’ because they are not progressive and do not in themselves lead inevitably to death.

“The Supreme Court has set a dangerous precedent. Taking these decisions away from the Court of Protection removes an important layer of legislative scrutiny and accountability and effectively weakens the law.

“It will make it more likely that severely brain-damaged patients will be starved or dehydrated to death in their supposed ‘best interests’ and that these decisions will be more influenced by those who have ideological or financial vested interests in this course of action.”

He concluded: “Given that it costs about £100,000 per year to care for a person with PVS or MCS the potential ‘saving’ for the NHS could be as much as £2.4 billion annually if most seek to go down this route. Given the huge and growing financial pressure the health service is under is this really an additional pressure, no matter how subtle we want to put medical staff and administrators under.

“Coupled with this are the real, demonstrable and significant uncertainties about diagnosis and prognosis in both PVS and MCS. These have increased rather than decreased in the last 20 years and this is why continued court oversight is necessary.”

Meanwhile. in Belgium, new data shows that the number of euthanasia deaths continues to increase, euthanasia deaths for conditions related to aging have skyrocketed and three children died by euthanasia.

In 2016 there were 2028 reported euthanasia deaths up from 2021 in 2015 and in 2017 there were 2309 reported euthanasia deaths, a 14% increase from the previous year. There were 954 reported Belgian euthanasia deaths in 2010 representing a 242% increase in 7 years.

Since 2010, Belgium has expanded euthanasia to include children, people with mental or behavioral conditions and people who are not dying but have chronic conditions. The data indicates that in 2016/17 there were, reportedly, 3 children who died by euthanasia, 77 people with mental or behavior conditions and 710 people with sight loss or incontinence or conditions related to disability or age.

Continuing massive sexual abuse scandal in the "Catholic" church.

Almost on a daily basis, there are more and more stories of priests, bishops and cardinals, along with some heads of religious orders or "charitable" organizations of various sorts, taking advantage of, or outright using the vulnerable to their fulfill their own weird and bizarre sexual fantasies.

Let me be clear, there are many wolves in sheep's clothing currently stalking the halls of the innocent searching for new victims.  These demonic pimps are finally being vetted and exposed (absolutely no pun intended here, as this is a terrible attack on the youth of the Church by these phony skunks wearing the Roman collar).

Keep in mind, that some years ago, there were Communists that recruited "men" to enter the Catholic seminaries to become priests.  Most of these "men" were (or still are?) in the priesthood, or, they might have moved up the ranks, so to speak, and are now bishops or cardinals (or popes, over the years?).  It is thought that many of these "men" were, or still are homosexuals, not "frustrated" celibates going about the important business of the salvation of souls -- the first and foremost mission of the Church.

One of the prime recruiters (there were at least several) was a woman named Bella Dodd.  She was a Communist, and, in fact, testified before Congress on the mandate given her by the then Soviet Union.  Before she died, she reconciled to the Church, thank God!

But the damage was done, and continues to this day with many seminaries turning away real, decent men because they would not bend to the homosexual culture running rampant throughout the world.

I would like to mention something that few ever hear from the mainstream media these days, and that is the FACT that the sexual abuse scandal, as bad as it is in the Catholic Church, is worse, much worse among the public school teachers, administrators and coaches.  You read that right.  Much worse in the public school system across this country.  Do the research and see for yourself.  In addition, it is quite prevalent among Protestant pastors and ministers, as well as Rabbis, again, do the research.

This does not excuse the corrupt, satanic goings on among the human element in the Catholic Church.

Every single one of these monsters must face some type of justice, Catholic or not, if not in this world, then absolutely in the next.  My advice to these creatures: make amends before you breath your last...

Please pray for the victims of these scallywags, and continue to pray for our country.

Gene DeLalla 

 

Humility, the foundation of holiness.

...And the publican standing afar off, would not so much as lift up his eyes towards heaven, but struck his breast, saying, O God, be merciful to me a sinner...

It is hard, sometimes very hard, to embrace humility, or, said another way, to give up pride and self exultation.

If only we, as a people, could humble ourselves, just think of the incredible possibilities!  A holy nation under the guidance and grace of God Almighty!

Can it happen?

But we must also face reality, and that reality suggests that, right now, we are nowhere near as a humble people, a humble nation.  So, this means we have a lot of work to do.  Can we, at least, meet the Creator half-way down the road, and start the enormous task ahead of us?

The blessings would be astronomical!  And this is not pie-in-the-sky; it's possible.  If I didn't think so, then why hope for anything, anything at all?  Just close up shop and crawl into a cave.  

Pray for humility, not only for ourselves, but also for our country as a whole..

Gene DeLalla

Our responsibilities as citizens; as parents.

Like it or not, we live in a contorted, emasculated world, where priorities have been turned upside-down.  These circumstances present more challenges and more needed solutions if we are to be good stewards of the freedoms that are still left to us and our families, especially, our children.  What kind of world will they face if nothing changes in the coming days, weeks, months and years.

We see anarchy and rebellion, supported and encouraged by those individuals hell-bent on changing, not only our country, but the world at large, in my opinion, for the worse.

The evisceration of our precious God-given rights, especially the right to life, is coming under constant attack by those who have lost the ability to discern right from wrong, good from evil.  This, I believe, is done out of malice, if not out of ignorance.

If they succeed in corrupting and influencing the younger generation, especially those children that have been entrusted to their parents as gifts from Above, the "bad guys" will win the war for their souls; their future.  This cannot happen; we cannot let it happen!

What is necessary is to re-focus our efforts to be good and decent citizens; to give good example to our neighbors, friends, extended family members, but most importantly, to our own families.  Remember: charity begins at home.  There is much truth in this.

The family unit is the bedrock and building block of society.  It also implies the preservation of traditional morals, and acceptable behavior of our offspring (read: discipline), without which, there is chaos, not only in the family unit, but also in society at large.

Fathers must be fathers!  Mothers must be mothers!

The roles of each are crucial to the success of the family.  This is a natural observation and conclusion of the roles of each party.

The father should be the head of the family, and the mother should be the heart of the family; the two being complimentary.  Children, being the "sponges" they are, will observe and "record" what they see and hear between mom and dad, the effects can be immense, and, hopefully, for the positive, not the negative!

I would be remiss in leaving out those who choose the single state in life.

They too, must be good citizens, and have much to offer according to their particular talents contributing to the stability and preservation of societal norms.

In conclusion, we are all directed to be perfect as the Father in heaven is perfect.  A lofty goal?  Yes, very lofty.  Is it attainable?  Maybe, maybe not, but at least we have to try our best.

Pray for direction, and pray for our country.

Gene DeLalla 

Ben Franklin was right: if you give up freedom for security, you deserve neither.

Let me ask you all a question: since "9/11," how many professional baseball games, football games, basketball games, hockey games, soccer games, not to mention college baseball games, basketball games, football games, soccer games have been played all across the country?

Go, on, take a guess...

I'll take a guess: 50,000?  100,000?   200,000?

And I haven't even included any high school games of various sorts.

Actually, your guess is as good as mine.

Next question: how many "9/11's" have there been since September, 11, 2001?

Okay, here's the answer: there haven't been any other "9/11's".

Why is that?

Do you even have an answer?

I'll give you my answer: there haven't been any other "9/11's" because "9/11" was planned from the beginning and carried out, not by a bunch a Arab loonies, but by the traitors within our own governmental structure.

There has been much written about this momentous event, but I'll just skim the surface here...

Realize, that anyone who dares to question the official government investigative report, or offers another explanation, they, or we, or I, are quickly labeled quacks, or conspiracy nuts.

The question begs: where is the real conspiracy?

A little background is in order here; first, I was in two branches of the military, the first, as an Air Force Security Policeman, originally stationed at a Strategic Air Command base, then a year in Vietnam.  The second, I was a Coast Guard search and rescue radioman (communications specialist).

While in SAC (the acronym for Strategic Air Command), NORAD (North American Air Defense Command -- jointly operated by American and Canadian personnel) was SAC's "eyes" and "ears."

Every missile or plane or satellite that was ever launched, was immediately tracked by NORAD; if a threat was determined to be real, then that entity notified SAC.  This is important because the commercial jet airliners -- if that's what they were -- that went off course and headed into the Twin Towers, was seen by, and reported up the chain of command by NORAD.

Fighter jets then were supposed to be scrambled to intercept the errant jets and take them down.  That was not done.  It is a fact, that some were directed out to sea -- because of some supposed military exercise -- while others were commanded to "stand down."  Translation: the civilian authorities ordered the military not to intercept the rogue jet airliners.

But it's not only New York that was targeted, the Pentagon was also targeted.  Keep in mind that the air space over New York, and especially that over or near the Pentagon and D.C., is highly restricted; nothing would be allowed to get that close to the iconic building housing the heart and soul of the American Defense Department.

But no fighter jets were dispatched to take out the plane (or missile?) that hit the Pentagon.  None.

I could go on and on here, but suffice to say that if the Towers were not evidence enough of planned demolition, then I bring your attention to Building 7; a 47-story-skyscraper that fell into it's own footprint -- at free-fall speed,

A perfectly planned demolition!  Perfect!

Also, take a look at a much less known or discussed Building 6, and try to figure out what happened to that structure!

The points being made here, is that just before "9//11," and just after, federal legislation was enacted to severely restrict or contract our freedoms all in the name of security, with fear of other "attacks" being the main weapon that the out of control oligarchy, concerned not with our safety or those precious freedoms, but the monies and power that is always behind such disastrous exploits.

So let me repeat: of all those sporting games that I mentioned at the beginning of my article, notice that not one "terror" attack was carried out on all those vulnerable fans, soaking up the sun and beer.

Not one...

Have we been lied to?

Ben Franklin was correct: if you give up freedom for security, you deserve neither.

Gene DeLalla