Why the gutless Republicrats?

As a true conservative -- not a neo-con -- I am totally disgusted with the Republicrat elites in the House and Senate of the U.S. of A.

Very few have the testosterone to stand up to the Demonrats.

Why?

Well, if you want to know the REAL answer, here it is: there is NO difference between the Demonrats and the Republicrats, that's why.

The elites of both parties have sold their souls to the devil for position and power, and will do everything in their power to stop a popular president elected in an electoral landslide from fulfilling an agenda that swept him into the White House in the first place.

If you think I'm exaggerating, think again. Those very same elites: read, globalists, are hell-bent on building a wall -- but not a border wall! -- to ensnare and entangle President Trump, and keep him from keeping his promises made during the campaign of 2016.

Sure, he has done wonders so far, but unless and until he takes extraordinary measures to ensure he can truly continue to represent the American people, he will be doomed to failure.  There is little if any help from those higher-ups in his own party.

In fact, I'll so far as to say Mr. Trump is completely surrounded by his enemies -- they are our enemies as well! -- and wear the Republicrat hat.

Just take a quick look at the newest spending bill (another "continuing resolution") to keep the government open until late December; it fully funds Murder, Inc. (AKA: "planned parenthood").  Not only that, but it allows for continued "research" on the tissue of aborted babies!  Remember, the selling of aborted baby parts is a federal crime, and yet, there is more funding?

The new C.R. also keeps and expands more illegal aliens and their "families" to come into our country for cheap labor, that's being pushed by outgoing Speaker of the House, Ryan, and others, such as the Chamber of Commerce and the Koch brothers.

Bad company all...

The "deep state" is truly at the bottom of this mess.  They want to see Mr. Trump fail and fall flat on his face.

All these punks are a great argument for term limits for all congressmen and senators, as well as federal judges.  I say again, TERM LIMITS FOR ALL!

Is there hope?  Yes, of course.  How do I know -- or hope -- because God will not be mocked.  Those who hate their brothers, will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven.

Am I being judgmental?  Absolutely.  I judge those haters with malice of forethought for their fellow man/woman/child.  Our Creator will only put up with so much, then He will take vengeance.  It will be interesting to see the reaction when He comes -- if it's in our lifetimes.  I bet some will be scared to death -- literally!  And rightly so.  Some will repent, others will scream their hate for the One who sacrificed so much to save us, yet they (we?) kick Him in the face over and over again.

Why, you might ask, am I using "religion" when I discuss politics?  Because one of the reasons for the mess we're in, is the so-called "separation of church and state," that's why.  When God is kicked out of the public sphere, it opens the door to evil, and that evil is firmly entrenched in far too many of our representatives who make "laws" allowing the continued killing of the pre-born legal, as well as so many other abominations it would take a book to fill...

In conclusion, I would ask -- as I always do -- to pray for our country; our president, and especially for the end to abortion; please!

Gene DeLalla

The sickening kangaroo court of Judge Kavanaugh.

For those who watch the "6 o'clock news," or read what passes for a "newspaper" these days, I'm sure the view of Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, must go something like this: how can the president of the U.S. nominate a despicable, low-life abuser of innocent, young women?  And further, we can't have such an abominable character sitting on the court for ten, twenty, thirty years or more, handing down rulings that will affect the-almost "sacred" "right" of a woman to destroy the developing child in her womb.  (But it is unclear that Judge Kavanaugh, if he is finally confirmed to the court, would consistently rule in favor of life, over the death sentence usually handed down against the pre-born.)

This is not the first time such a spectacle of accusations and perjured testimony against an eminent, and an immensely qualified federal judge had to endure before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

For those old enough to remember, go back in the early 90's, and you'll find Clarence Thomas, and before him, Judge Bork, also victims of the kangaroo court of public opinion. 

If just a cursory search is made, one can see the trials and near-persecution that those two men went through, again, enduring perjured testimony as well as character smearing beyond anything I have ever seen until now, reaching new lows with Mr. Kavanaugh as the latest victim. 

Has Judge Kavanaugh had enough; will he give up?  

Judge Bork gave up.  But Clarence Thomas was eventually confirmed, and now sits on the Supreme Court. As an aside, Judge Thomas is a practicing Catholic.  And I wonder if being a Catholic was one of the reasons he suffered through the sickening inquisition by the liberals on the committee?  Of course, that's a rhetorical question.  

I would like to recount another -- illegal -- grilling of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.  She was one of those on the "short-list" of President Trump to fill the vacancy left by Justice Scalia. 

When questioned before the Judiciary Committee, the ultra-liberal Sens. Feinstein and Sanders, raised the possibility that her Catholic faith would influence her decisions if confirmed to the court.  Those inquiries were, and are un-Constitutional, as there is to be no litmus test for public office.  And yet, Judge Barrett let those characters get away without challenging them that her rights were being violated under that same Constitution.  Sad. 

Judge Barrett and her husband have seven children, apparently upholding the Church's teaching on marriage, avoiding contraception, and allowing the marital act to be open to life.  Yet, she wrote this: “Judges cannot-nor should they try to-align our legal system with the Church's moral teaching whenever the two diverge.”

Excuse me?  If that's the case, then it's the legal system that is corrupt, and MUST align to the Church's moral teaching, not the other way around!

If she considers herself a practicing Catholic, then how in the world can she believe that the Church's moral teaching has to be discarded in favor of, what?  What is "legal," over what is moral?  And if the Natural Law dictates that the killing of the pre-born is immoral and illegal, then how could she ignore those facts?

Do you see the problem here?  Why are Catholics in the public sphere so afraid to stand up for what the Church teaches?  Why are they so weak -- or is it ambition -- that justifies casting aside their precious faith in order to achieve power or position in this life? 

Is this problematic, present-day attitude to be laid at the feet of the Church herself?  Is the compromising of the perennial teachings of the Deposit of Faith, Scripture and Tradition, as handed down from Christ and the Apostles themselves, due to the "spirit of the age" influencing the decisions and actions of an already weakened hierarchy?

I contend that the problem is that this attitude, this weakness, not only reverberates throughout the Church, but also throughout society as well.  You can't separate what is happening in the Church from what is happening in the world at large.  The Church was once looked upon as a moral beacon, by Catholics and non-Catholics alike, but is this still the case?

I ask anyone of good will to pray for our country, but also pray for the Catholic Church.  

Gene DeLalla

  

I thank you for all the prayers for my mother-in-law..

I truly thank all those caring folks that offered prayers and condolences for my mother-in-law, Edith Ryder, who recently passed on.  It is good to know that she touched the lives of so many people she didn't even know.  God bless you all..

Gene DeLalla

Does Hell exist?

The following is an excerpt taken from an article appearing on CNSnews.com.

In his article, "Do We Still Need to Believe in Hell," Dr. Bruce writes, "Hell lost some of its purchase on humankind in the 19th century, when new scientific theories such as Darwinism eroded the authority of the Bible and the tides of sentiment turned against God’s wrath in favor of His mercy.

"... In some distant, better future, the foreclosure of Hell will be an important step in the maturation of human communities that can mete out justice on their own, without supernatural aid."

No, I don't know Dr. Bruce, but I can tell you that he is an atheist, simply, by the above quote.  

I do know that the word atheist is a pretty strong word to use these days, but there comes a time when we must call a spade a spade, and, more importantly, stand up for what we believe.

One of the main reasons for the "culture of death" that permeates American (and world) society, is the negative "belief" in something that doesn't exist!  

How can this be?  It doesn't make any sense to deny a negative!  This is the irrationality of an atheist.  But why would anyone choose to be irrational, especially when it comes to God or Christ?  Because just the mention of God or Christ tweaks their conscience; an atheist simply can't run and hide; He's everywhere.

Forget, for the time being, the supernatural, because even on the natural level, the obvious cannot be denied; the evidence is all around us; it stares us in the face; we can see it, touch it, observe it in the night sky.  Nature abounds with a finger that points to the Creator, especially when we see a child being born.  A true miracle!  I know it was for me...

I just mentioned the culture of death; it is all too real, and comes in many forms.  And that child being born?  Look at the opposite: killing that child before she is born.  Why would anyone do such a thing?  This is a rhetorical question, because we know the answer: "... In some distant, better future, the foreclosure of Hell will be an important step in the maturation of human communities that can mete out justice on their own, without supernatural aid."

That's why.

Again, just as on a human, natural level, without governance, man becomes as the wild animals in the jungle, and mirrors Darwin's survival of the fittest, or, take for example, the Declaration of the Rights of Man, written as a tenet of the French Revolution.  

One of the key provisions of the Dec. of the Rights of Man, is the "right" to do whatever you want, when you want, with no restrictions (of morality or religion) save for one: not interfering or denying the rights of others to do the same!  What Godless lunacy!

Of course, one of the tenets of the "progressives" of any revolution, is the first part of Dr. Bruce's quote: "...when new scientific theories such as Darwinism eroded the authority of the Bible and the tides of sentiment turned against God’s wrath in favor of His mercy."

Notice two things: first, he refers to Darwinism, and, two, the sloppy, warm and fuzzy "Christianity" that is floating around: "...against God's wrath in favor of His (at least he capitalized the "H" in His!  Maybe there is hope for this guy?) mercy."

I have to give him credit where credit is due: he hit the nail on the head; the emphasis is now on God's mercy, rather than His justice.  The fact of the matter is, you cannot have one without the other.  To believe in mercy without justice, is to presume on His mercy no matter what one does, but this presumption is a sin against the virtue of Hope; the other being despair.  There must be a balance; to ignore the justice part of the equation is to fall into the trap of not worrying about our actions, words, or inactions, thinking that at the end of our lives, we can presume that He will be merciful toward us! 

And that trap is what the demon wants us to fall into.  After all, he told us long ago that we can take a bite of that apple and "be like God": the ultimate PRESUMPTION.

Gene DeLalla

  

  

The passing of my mother-in-law...

At 11PM last night, (officially, 12:17am by the nurse) my mother-in-law, Edith Ryder, 88 years old, passed away with all her children around her.  A priest was called and gracefully came from a distance to pray over her.  She suffered much.  Her husband, Donald, died several years ago.  He was a POW in North Korea for nearly 28 months, and as I've read, he was a hero to his brother prisoners, getting whatever additional supplies and food to those suffering more than he.

In 1993, I lost my dad; he was 82.  In 2001, just before "9/11", my brother died at the young age of 59.  In 2007, on December 26 (the feast of St. Stephen), my mom passed away at the age of 92 (she was still sharp as a tack!).  All my former, immediate family members are now gone.  Plus, all my grandmothers, grandfathers, aunts and uncles; I guess this is an indication that I'm getting older...

It is also an indication -- maybe more like getting hit over the head with a brick! -- that we don't know when we will be called to be judged by Christ, our Just Judge, and be accountable to Him for our actions, words, or inactions, for that matter.

Can you all see just how important it is to get right with God?   And I'm not just talking about "accepting Christ as your personal Savior" either, but rather doing all that He commanded us to do, in Scripture and sacred Tradition.  We cannot pick and choose what to believe, or what commandments we wish to obey, while ignoring others that may SEEM too difficult to fulfill.  We don't have that luxury, not if we want to be part of that select group: the Elect.

I ask all those of good will to pray for my mother-in-law; for God's mercy on her immortal soul.

RIP, Edith Ryder.

Gene DeLalla

 

Hollywood and the ghost of John McCain invade the Middle East...

The title of the article should be: Hollywood and the ghost of John McCain CONTINUE to invade the Middle East.

Let's take a quick look at the "civil"-war-torn country of Syria...

First, it is not a civil war, hence the quotation marks.  It is, and has been, a war of the government forces of Assad, and the outsiders attempting regime change.  The "rebels" have been, and continue to be, supported, financed and encouraged by the ghost of John McCain and his legion of war-hawks tied in to the military industrial complex of the U.S. of A.

When it comes right down to it, a nation's sovereignty means little if anything to those with the agenda of perpetual war, never satisfied with the death, destruction and destroyed lives that their insatiable appetite for --- MONEY --- causes.  As I always say: follow the money trial...

If there is a big winner in any war, it is, by far, the military industrial complex that former President Eisenhower warned about so many years ago.

Second, President Trump has, I'm afraid, fallen for the trap set by the war mongers in his cabinet, including, but not limited to Nikki Halley -- his ambassador to the U.N., as well as John Bolton as security advisor.

I point to one example -- there are many -- of the so-called gassing of the Syrian civilians by their president, Assad, and his forces.

If anyone has ever read or heard of gas being used in war, there is a certain attribute that is inherent in such attacks, not only to those that are affected, but also includes medical personnel attempting to render aid.

Take a look at the horrendous effects of gas used by the Germans against the allies in World War I.  To my understanding, the gases used were of the nerve and mustard varieties.  Exposure was deadly, or at least completely debilitating, or life-changing to those unfortunate enough to be caught without a gas mask.

In Syria, there was a supposed gas attack, followed quickly -- with little investigation to find out the truth of what actually happened -- by Pres. Trump launching dozens of Cruise missiles at an air field, where, supposedly, there was a stockpile of cannisters of poison gas.  And now, there is talk of another imminent -- false flag -- gas attack, again, by Assad against his own people.

It just doesn't make any sense.  Why?  Because the government forces, with the help of the Russians, and others, are defeating the rebels that have been attempting to drive Assad from office, and to further destabilize the country.  But these "rebels" have been, and continue to be, supported by the likes of the now-dead McCain and his cronies.  And Trump, again, has warned that another gas attack will be met with more Cruise missiles and who knows what else?  Will there be an investigation after such an attack, if it does happen, or will there be a rush to judgment without placing the blame where it really belongs?

And now, Hollywood...

I have seen some really bad acting in the areas of the supposed gas attacks and the aftermath, with victims and medical personnel obviously following a scripted scenario.  Not only that, but the so-called "white helmets" have been accused of being the actual perpetrators of the false flag attacks in several areas of Syria, as well as being friendly with the so-called "rebels."

If you think that Hollywood's involvement is far-fetched, think of the elites of that debauched group and what their mission is here in the U.S.: taking out Trump at all costs, and in any way possible -- peaceful or not.  Tie this together with the disaster of Syria, and the picture becomes much clearer.  Again, follow the money and ideological trail, it usually leads to complete socialism, and absolute government control of every aspect of our lives.

Please pray for Pres. Trump, and pray for our country.

Gene DeLalla

We want our Church back!!

About 2,000 years ago, an interesting incident took place somewhere in the Holy Land.  It seems that a Pharisee by the name of Saul of Tarsus, was heading overland to Damascus, Syria, to obtain more damaging information about the early Christians.  His chore: to bring those Christians to "justice."

As he, and his cronies, were approaching the famed city, an extremely bright light along with a loud sound as if a mini-whirlwind had encircled Saul, and knocked him off his donkey.  The men travelling with him were confused and scared, but they didn't see all that was affecting their companion, and they certainly didn't hear what Saul heard: (a voice from out of the clear blue sky) Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?

Saul was stunned beyond comprehension, then blinded.

He exclaimed something to the effect: who are you?  What do you mean I'm persecuting you?  I don't even know you?

All this while in sort of a drunken stupor, flailing around on the ground, reaching for thin air...

What was the source of the voice from above?  It was the "dead" Christ.

Saul wondered why he was accused of persecuting this Christ, when he never even met Him?

The point of this encounter was two-fold: one, this was the beginning of the transformation of Saul of Tarsus, to becoming St. Paul, the great Apostle to the Gentiles.  And, two, to indicate to Saul of Tarsus, that when he was persecuting the nascent Christian Church, he was, in reality, persecuting Christ Himself!

In other words, Saul had been persecuting Christ!  The Head of the Mystical Body, the Church.

Fast forward to today...

There is another persecution of the Church going on right now on a massive scale.  Not only from without, but also this time, from within by the very shepherds designated to lead the flock to their eternal destiny, but instead are scandalizing and corrupting their charges in the most heinous of ways: infidelity, in the form of sexual deviancy.  Not just personal sexual deviancy, but in many cases overt homosexual deviancy.

Information has come to light of a vast and widespread network of corruption and scandal among  some of the rotten apples in the clergy.  Of course, even the good guys wearing the Roman collar are now lumped in with the same rotting fruit that has fallen from the evil tree, confusing even more, the lay faithful.

Whom can they trust?  Whom can WE trust?

Let me now harken back to the now-converted Saul, renamed Paul, and with the "St." in front of his name...

It seemed there was a controversy bubbling just below the surface among the hierarchical structure of the new Christian Church, with Peter (St. Peter) concerning some of the old customs of the new Jewish converts, causing confusion -- and scandal -- between those very same Jewish converts and the Gentiles that had entered the Church.  Basically, should those old customs be carried over into the new Christian traditions?

St. Paul attempted to iron-out the controversy, but how?

By resisting St. Peter to his face (as reported in Scripture).

Remember, St. Peter had been a weak and sinful man who denied Christ not once, but three times.  And yet, Christ selected and appointed him to be the head of His Church!  It should be easy to see, that the reason for the Church in the first place, is for sinful men and women; the just have no need of penance.

The point of my short article is to point out that today we lay faithful and those clergy who abhor the vast scandal affecting the flock, and remain in solidarity with Scripture and Tradition, must fight those rotten apples and pray for their conversion or defeat.  Even if that means going all the way up to the pope; to resist him to his face!

We faithful Catholics want our Church back!

Right now, we are in a period of severe testing, perhaps like no other in its 2,000 year history.  Will the Church survive this crises?

The answer is YES!  How do I know?  Because we have Christ's own words: the gates of hell  will not prevail against it.

I ask those of good will to pray for the Catholic Church, and to pray of our country.

Gene DeLalla