In
a documentary (2011) on the 9/11 affair, the supporters of the
government’s official report attempted to show the inconsistencies of those
“truthers” and others demanding another investigation of what really caused the
twin towers – and building seven – to collapse at nearly free-fall speed.
In
the documentary, there were two glaring examples of missing information and
inconsistencies that became obvious: the first – and most important? – is that
the twin towers were designed to survive multiple jet hits.
This,
according to the designer of the buildings.
And, second: the documentary didn’t even mention the destruction of
WTC7. A forty-seven story skyscraper.
In
fact, building seven wasn’t even mentioned in the official NIST report until
2008!
A
forty-seven story building is taller than most buildings in many American
cities, and yet it wasn’t mentioned in the documentary. Why?
Anyone
who watched building seven collapse could see that it was, in fact, an example
of a perfect demolition. It too, fell at
free-fall speed. And yet the government
says that fire caused it to fall.
No
skyscraper has ever fallen due to fire.
Not in this country, nor in any other country on earth.
Were
the “attacks” on 9/11 another “Pearl Harbor” that ushered in legislation that
further reduced or eliminated many of our liberties in order to be more
secure?
Ben
Franklin said that those who sacrifice liberty for security, will have
neither.
Who,
then, are the real conspirators?
Eugene
DeLalla
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment.