Remember when the Spanish conquistadors explored Mexico and Central America, they found the native Indians (Incas and Aztecs) dealing in the demonic, gruesome practice of human sacrifice to their gods.
One of the ceremonies of these murderous pagans, was to take a person (who was groomed to be the victim), bring him (or her?) up to the altar, cut open his chest and rip out the still beating heart and offer it to their devilish god...
The Catholic soldiers quickly put an end to this monstrosity of slaughter to the false gods of those lunatics.
Fast forward to the present day...
As we know, our country has sanctioned the legal murder of the pre-born since the 1973 Roe v Wade disaster. As we also know that Satanic decision was recently overturned by the Supreme Court.
But has that stopped the genocide of our precious babies??
Nope.
In fact, only about 14 states have a total ban on the slaughter of the pre-born!
Now, the forces of evil and those trying to prevent the killing of our babies, has now become a fight among the individual states' legislatures -- and their respective courts, especially their supreme courts...
Also, it should be noted the official GOP platform adapted for the upcoming presidential election, has weakened and watered-down their previously, staunch, pro-life and pro-marriage stance!
Why?
What are they afraid of??
We all know that President Trump is not Catholic; he is against a federal ban on the killing of the pre-born, he also has no problem with contraception, and IVF... Further, he's a friend of the sodomites and the alphabet nut folks, so how on earth can a practicing Catholic vote for Trump??
Perhaps the Catholic principal of "double effect" might come into play here, but that topic is for another article...
I have digressed a bit here, so let me post the article from lifesitenews.com and written by Calvin Freiburger
"TOPEKA, Kansas (LifeSiteNews) — The Kansas Supreme Court voted 5-1 on July 5 to strike down a pair of pro-life laws that banned gruesome “dismemberment” abortion procedures and imposed safety regulations on abortion facilities, citing language in the Kansas Constitution that state pro-lifers tried unsuccessfully to clarify in 2022.
Catholic News Agency reports that the first ruling concerned a 2015 ban on dilation & evacuation (D&E) abortion procedures, commonly used in the second trimester and more commonly known as “dismemberment abortions” because they function by tearing a preborn baby apart limb by limb. The second concerned a 2011 set of safety and licensing rules for abortion facilities that engaged in either any abortions past the first trimester or more than four first-trimester abortions per month.
READ: Google bans viral video showing former abortionist describing how abortions are done
The justices, the majority of whom are Democrat appointees, ruled that the laws interfered with women’s “right” of “bodily integrity” under the Kansas Constitution’s Bill of Rights. An April 2019 precedent by the Kansas Supreme Court asserted that the constitution’s guarantee of “equal and inalienable natural rights” encompasses a “woman’s right” to murder her unborn child in abortion.
“The state is prohibited from restricting that right [sic] unless it can show it is doing so to further a compelling government interest,” the justices declared on Friday. The lone dissenter, Justice Caleb Stegall, said the majority’s decision “fundamentally alters the structure of our government to magnify the power of the state” and “paints the interest in unborn life championed by millions of Kansans as rooted in an ugly prejudice.”
“Adding insult to injury, extremely liberal judges of the Kansas Supreme Court have now overturned basic health and safety standards for abortion facilities when one of the state’s largest abortion franchises recently operated for an unknown period of time with no medical oversight,” responded Kansans for Life communications director Danielle Underwood.
The ruling vindicates the case Kansas pro-lifers made two years ago for a proposed constitutional amendment clarifying that the “constitution of the state of Kansas does not require government funding of abortion and does not create or secure a right to abortion,” and that “the people, through their elected state representatives and state senators, may pass laws regarding abortion.” That amendment ultimately failed at the ballot box 59 percent to 41 percent, in a defeat pro-lifers attributed in large part to disinformation about what it would actually do.
“It hurts to say ‘We told you so’ to the many Kansans who were misled by the abortion industry’s assurances that it would still be ‘heavily regulated’ in our state if voters rejected the 2022 amendment,” said Underwood.
The rulings come at a time when national Republicans led by former President and 2024 nominee Donald Trump are moving away from the party’s past longstanding commitments to ending abortion nationwide in favor of relegating all future battles over its legality to individual states. The Kansas Supreme Court demonstrates how, without federal protections for the preborn, abortion-on-demand can be insulated from state legislative efforts through constitutional language and activist judges.
READ: 89,000 babies have been saved from abortion since end of Roe: report
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment.