The Runaway Power Of The Tyrannical Supreme Court...

Has the "supreme court" taken the place of God Almighty? 

For instance: Can the "supreme court" decide who or what constitutes the institution of marriage?

Or...

The "supreme court" has determined that a woman can abort (kill; murder) her baby developing in her womb.  So, in effect, the "supreme court" has completely legalized murder, and has "found" that "right" somewhere in the Constitution of the United States...

Or...

Can the "supreme court" decide how many genders there are?

The "supreme court" has completely replaced the Natural Law, and has made the judicial branch of the government a law unto itself.   They have created law from the bench, bypassing the powers reserved specifically to the Congress..

Remember, when E. Kagan was testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee after being nominated to fill a vacancy on the "supreme court," one of the senators asked her what were her views on natural rights. 

Her answer: I have no views on natural rights.  

Let me repeat that: Kagan said that she had no views on natural rights!  Right then and there, she should have been rejected, but no, she was approved, and now will sit on the court for the rest of her natural life, continuing to obliterate what is left of our rights under the Natural Law.

Remember, too, it is not the government that grants us our rights, it is the job of government to guarantee those rights ingrained in us from God, from the time of our creation.     

This horrendous situation must -- and will! -- change.  It's just a matter of time before the American citizenry wakes up and sets into motion, the Declaration of Independence, if not, we are doomed to become slaves to the behemoth federal government.

Look at the diabolical Dred Scott decision of 1857, handed down by the "supreme court":

Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote the majority decision, which was issued on March 6, 1857. The court held that Scott was not free based on his residence in either Illinois or Wisconsin because he was not considered a person under the U.S. Constitution–in the opinion of the justices, black people were not considered citizens when the Constitution was drafted in 1787. According to Taney, Dred Scott was the property of his owner, and property could not be taken from a person without due process of law.

Can history repeat itself??

Pray for our country...

Gene DeLalla